Cases

HUNSTEIN, Presiding Justice, dissenting. 1. I cannot agree with the majority’s holding in Division 1 that parties in criminal and civil cases are not similarly situated when it comes to the qualifications of expert witnesses. Because I would hold that they are similarly situated and, further, that there is no rational basis for the distinction drawn by the Legislature, I would find that OCGA § 24-9-67.1 violates

212 F.Supp.2d 88 (2002) MASON, et al. v. AMERICAN TOBACCO CO., et al. No. 00-CV-04442. United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 25, 2002. *89 The Cuneo Law Group by Jonathon W. Cuneo, Washington, DC, Hutton & Hutton by Mark B. Hutton, Derek S. Casey, Chan P. Townsley, Wichita, KS, Richardson & Ward by Gary Richar

392 N.E.2d 806 (1979) Ronald L. MASON, Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee. No. 878S182. Supreme Court of Indiana. July 26, 1979. Rehearing Denied October 17, 1979 *807 Rick D. Meils, Indianapolis, for appellant. Theodore L. Sendak, Atty. Gen., Robert C. Swain, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for app

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN COLWELL, No. 12-15844 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:10-cv-00669- LRH-WGC ROBERT BANNISTER and HOWARD SKOLNIK, Defendants-Appellees. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for

49 So.3d 272 (2010) PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. Michele Mason LORENZO, Appellee. No. 4D09-127. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. September 1, 2010. *273 Robert I. Buchsbaum of Kramer, Green, Zuckerman, Greene & Buchsbaum, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant. Theodore J. Leop

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN COLWELL, No. 12-15844 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:10-cv-00669- LRH-WGC ROBERT BANNISTER and HOWARD SKOLNIK, Defendants-Appellees. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 95-CA-01100-SCT CLEMENT ALLEYNE AND GENE BAINES v. THEODORE JONES, TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK, KEN R. ADCOCK, NOT INDIVIDUALLY BUT AS TRUSTEE, JAMES C. "SAM" BRADFORD, GEORGE A. JONES, III AND CLINTORIA I. JONES THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED, PURSUANT TO M.R.A.P. 35-A DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/17/93 TRIAL JUDGE:

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 46 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 47 This is an appeal from an Ottawa County Common Pleas Court judgment which reformed the deed to property owned by plaintiff-appellee/cro

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00221-CV William Cody Wheeler, Appellant v.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00221-CV William Cody Wheeler, Appellant v. Howard L. Phillips (as Independent Executor of the Estate of Freddie Lee Phillips, Deceased); Michael Ball (as Independent Executor of the Estate of James Robert Ball, Deceased); Floyd Brown; Constantine Shah; Theodore Alverson; James Alverson;

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN ON MOTION FOR REHEARING NO. 03-10-00221-CV

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN ON MOTION FOR REHEARING NO. 03-10-00221-CV William Cody Wheeler, Appellant v. Howard L. Phillips (as Independent Executor of the Estate of Freddie Lee Phillips, Deceased); Michael Ball (as Independent Executor of the Estate of James Robert Ball, Deceased); Floyd Brown; Con

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Delores Ford, Alice Freeman, Henry Khanagara, Bettye Tate, Deborah Johnson, and Darrell Johnson sue Defendants, a collection of financial institutions associated with mortgage lending. In their Complaint [Dkt. 1] (the Original Complaint or Orig. Compl.), Plaintiffs allege a basket of both federal and state law claims, which Defendants have moved to dismiss. In response, Pl

{¶ 1} Appellant, T.T.,1 challenges the judgment of the juvenile court that awarded permanent custody of her son Q.G. to the Cuyahoga County Department of Children and Family Services ("CCDCFS"). Because the adjudicatory hearing proceeded in the mother's absence despite her explanation for that absence, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. {¶ 2} T.T., who is me

Opinion CROSKEY, J. Plaintiffs and appellants Pauline Fairbanks and Michael Cobb appeal from an order denying their motion for class certification in their action against Farmers New World Life Insurance Company and Farmers Group, Inc. (collectively, Farmers). Plaintiffs’ action alleges violations of the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200; henceforth UCL)1 in co

[Cite as State v. Russell, 2019-Ohio-704.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 107215 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

52 F.Supp.2d 569 (1999) WM. C. VICK CONSTRUCTION CO., Plaintiff, v. PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and Great American Insurance Co., Defendants. No. 5:97-CV-692-BR(1). United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division. March 24, 1999. *570 *571 Daniel

OPINION OF THE COURT Theodore G. Barlow, J. The codefendants, Mason and Riley, have been indicted for the crimes of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law, § 160.15) and robbery in the second degree (Penal Law, § 160.10), each as a juvenile offender. At the time of the alleged commission *584of the crimes charged, Mason was 14 years old and Riley w

KING, Circuit Judge: Before the court is an interlocutory appeal from an order granting Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification pursuant to Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The certified class putatively consists of various governmental entities within the State of Louisiana whose representatives entered into contracts with Defendants for cellular telephone service. In the underlying suit,

40 So.3d 829 (2010) STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES as Receiver of First Commercial Insurance Company, Appellant, v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Appellee. and State of Florida Department of Financial Services as Receiver of First Commercial Transportation and Property Insurance Company, Appellant, v. Branch Banking and Trust Company, Appellee. Nos. 1D09-6448, 1D09-6450.