Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RUFE, District Judge. The seventeen above-captioned individual actions have been transferred to a multidistrict' litigation (“MDL”) docket established1 to consolidate, for -purposes of coordinated pretrial proceedings, cases in federal court that “arise from allegations that certain diabetes drugs manufactured by [Defendant SmithKlineBeecham Corp.

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION This is an action for the infringement of a patent for a non-invasive thermometer. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict finding that defendant BestMed LLC (“BestMed”) willfully infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,597,668 (“the '668 Patent”), of which plaintiff Medisim Ltd. (“Medisim”) is the

*194MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The States of Montana and Nevada allege that pharmaceutical manufacturers fraudulently overstate the published “average wholesale prices” (“AWP’s”) of many of their prescription drugs to the detriment of the States, which reimburse providers based on AWP’s, and their ci

ANDREWS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE On September 18, 2015, Amgen, Inc. and Amgen Manufacturing, Limited (collectively, "Amgen") sued Hospira, Inc. for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,856,298 under 35 U.S.C. §§

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendants have moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by the County of Suffolk in New York in this multi-district litigation involving allegations of fraud against various pharmaceutical companies.1 Suffolk alleges that Defendant pharmaceutical manufacturers have fraudulently inflated th

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) TAMMY HARTZLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3802 (GMH) ) ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, ) Secretary of

174 Cal.App.4th 339 (2009) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ Y.K.A. INDUSTRIES, INC., Cross-complainant and Appellant, v. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE et al., Cross-defendants and Respondents. No. H031583. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. April 28, 2009. *343 Law Offices of Schreiber &

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION New York City and forty-two New York counties have brought suit against numerous pharmaceutical manufacturers and subsidiaries alleging Medicaid fraud in violation of the federal Best Prices statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1396r, and state law including alleged violations of New York’s consumer protection statute, N.Y. Gen. Bus. L

49 Cal.4th 758 (2010) 111 Cal. Rptr. 3d 666 233 P.3d 1066 JAMES CLAYWORTH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PFIZER, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. S166435. Supreme Court of California. July 12, 2010. *761 Alioto Law Firm, Joseph M. Alioto, Joseph M. Alioto, Jr., T

672 F.Supp.2d 211 (2009) In re PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: The City of New York, et al., Plaintiff, v. Abbott Laboratories, et al., Defendant. MDL No. 1456. Civil Action No. 01-12257-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 4, 2009. *212 Lisa W

165 Cal.App.4th 209 (2008) JAMES CLAYWORTH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PFIZER, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. A116798. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two. July 25, 2008. *213 Alioto Law Firm, Joseph M. Alioto, Theresa D. Moore, Angelina Alioto-Grace, Joseph M. Alioto, Jr., Thomas

339 F.Supp.2d 165 (2004) In re: PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION County of Suffolk v. Abbott Laboratories, et al. No. MDL 1456. No. CIV.A.01-12257-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 30, 2004. *166 *167 *168

624 F.Supp.2d 396 (2009) In Re: AVANDIA MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: Ayala-Castro, et al. v. GlaxoSmithKline, et al. Bone, et al. v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, et al. Boone v. GlaxoSmithKline, et al. Bowles, et al. v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, et al. Cross, et al. v. GlaxoSmithKline, et al.<

321 F.Supp.2d 187 (2004) In re PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION State of Nevada v. American Home Products Corp., et al., State of Montana v. Abbott Labs, Inc., et al., MDL No. 1456. No. CIV.A.01-12257-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 10, 2004. *188