Cases

Thompson, Associate Judge: On January 26, 2012, this court imposed a negotiated disciplinary sanction 1 on petitioner Robert W. Manee III, suspending him from the practice of law in this jurisdiction for six months and conditioning his reinstatement upon proof of fitness to practice law and p

Motion Granted; Judgment Set Aside, Case Remanded, and Memorandum Opinion filed May 21, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00874-CV TAMMI WALLACE; WILLIAM ISAAC DAVIS, III; LARA ATTAYI; DIMITRI FETOKAKIS; ROBERT JARA; RYAN HALEY; STEPHEN L. MADDEN; MICHAEL V. GROVER; AND AMIR SABZEVARI, IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, Appellants

ROTHENBERG, J. Shakyna Danaya Thomas (“Thomas”) and Arthur Lee Wallace (‘Wallace”), who are husband and'wife, seek a writ of prohibition to prevent further prosecution of the charges against them in this case. Thomas contends that continuation of the prosecution of the charges against her violates her right to a speedy trial pursuant to Florida Rule of Crim

31 So.3d 557 (2010) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee, v. W.D. WALLACE, Appellant. No. 44,880-KA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. January 27, 2010. *558 Peggy J. Sullivan, Monroe, for Appellant. Robert W. Levy, District Attorney, Carey T. Brown, Samuel A. Shealy, Clifford R. Strider, III, Assistant District Attorn

Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 496 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-23-463 ABBY WALLACE Opinion Delivered October 9, 2024 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CRAIGHEAD V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CA-01148-COA ROBERT B. WALLACE APPELLANT v. LEIGH ANN WALLACE APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/23/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. TROY FARRELL ODOM COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: RANKIN COUNTY CHANCERY COURT A

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0069p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-App

121 S.W.3d 652 (2003) Donald WALLACE v. STATE of Tennessee. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. October 1, 2003 Session. December 23, 2003. *654 Richard McGee and James O. Martin, III, Nashville, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Donald Wallace. Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General; David H. Findley, Assistant Attorney Ge

936 A.2d 757 (2007) Eric R. WALLACE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. Nos. 04-CF-299, 05-CO-1328. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued December 20, 2006. Decided September 13, 2007. *759 J. Alex Ward, with whom David A. Handzo appeared on the brief, for appellant. Robert E. Leidenheimer, Jr.

Cite as 2022 Ark. 95 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-21-195 Opinion Delivered: May 5, 2022 ROBERT SMITH III APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. V. 23CR-18-929]

Cite as 2022 Ark. 95 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-21-195 Opinion Delivered: May 5, 2022 ROBERT SMITH III APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 23CR- V. 18-929]

J. Steve Wallace and Lucy S. Wallace sued Robert P. Sholund, Inc. ("RPS"); Robert P. Sholund and Patricia H. Sholund; Frontier Bank, N.A. ("Frontier"); and Nicholas Lee and Tammy Lee in the Jefferson Circuit Court seeking to have set aside as a fraudulent conveyance a deed from RPS to the Sholunds and to declare a subsequent deed from the Sholunds to the Lees, and the Lees' mortgage to Frontier on the property conveyed by the deed, to be subject to the voiding of the earlier deed on t

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA ROBERT WALLACE, Petitioner, v. HON. JAMES D. SMITH, JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA, Respondent Judge, CHRISTIAN NAVA CRUZ, A SINGLE INDIVIDUAL; IMPALA ENTERPRISES L.L.C., AN ARIZONA LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION, DBA EL TUBO TUBO,

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This interlocutory appeal involves a class action over smelly washing machines. Across the country, consumers have filed class actions against the manufacturers of front-loading washing machines. See, e.g., In re Whirlpool Corp. Front-Loading Washer Prods. Liab. Litig., 722 F.3d 838 (6th Cir.2013); B

JUSTICE FREEMAN, specially concurring: I agree that Maryville Academy and its employees (hereinafter Maryville Academy) may not invoke parental immunity as a defense to plaintiffs action. Thus, I concur in the result reached by the majority. However, I disagree with the analysis the majority uses in arriving at its decision.

THOMAS, Circuit Judge. In this appeal, we consider whether, in the absence of a request from an unrepresented petitioner, a district court is required to consider, sua sponte, the option of staying and abeying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus when the petitioner has filed a “mixed” petition consisting of both exhausted and unexhauste

762 N.E.2d 83 (2001) 327 Ill. App.3d 411 260 Ill.Dec. 817 Shandoulia WALLACE, Indiv. and as Adm'r of the Estate of Waketta Roy Wallace, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John P. SMYTH, Paul Voltz, Laura Angelucci, and Xavier Collier, Indiv. and as Agents and Employees of Maryville Academy, and Maryville Academy, a Not-For-Profit Corporation; Jill Jacobe, Jim Geidner, and Dee Le Bel, R.N., Indiv. and

703 N.E.2d 416 (1998) 301 Ill. App.3d 75 234 Ill.Dec. 555 Shandoulia WALLACE, individually and as administrator of the estate of Waketta Roy Wallace, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John P. SMYTH, Paul Voltz, Laura Angelucci, Xavier Collier, individually and as agents and employees of Maryville Academy, and Maryville Academy, a not-for-profit corporation; Jill Jacobe, Jim Geidner, Dee Le Bel, R.N.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ROBERT WALLACE KRAMER, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-743 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed April

FILED September 18,2015 TICOURTOF WORKERS' CO~'lPE);SATIO); CLAn,r s