Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Roberts v. Appellation Wine and Spirits, LLC”
Conn Fine Wine & Spirits, LLC v. Seagullpublic domain
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: *24Connecticut Fine Wine and Spirits, d/b/a Total Wine & More ("Total Wine") appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Janet C. Hall, District Judge) dismissing its complaint against the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection ("DCP") and the Directo
Connecticut Fine Wine and Spirits LLC v. Seagullpublic domain
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: *162 Connecticut Fine Wine and Spirits, d/b/a Total Wine & More ("Total Wine") appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Janet C. Hall, District Judge) dismissing its complaint against the Connecticu
Wiseman Park, LLC v. S. Glazer's Wine & Spirits, LLCpublic domain
GOODMAN, J.* *113Wiseman Park, LLC (appellant) appeals from the judgment entered following the trial court sustaining the demurrer of Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits, LLC (respondent)1 to appellant's complaint without leave to amend. Appellant, the holder of a license to sell alcoholi
Connecticut Fine Wine and Spirits, LLC v. Seagullpublic domain
17-2003 Connecticut Fine Wine and Spirits, LLC v. Seagull 17‐2003 Connecticut Fine Wine and Spirits, LLC v. Seagull United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 6th day of
Wine & Spirits Retailers, Inc. v. Rhode Islandpublic domain
SELYA, Senior Circuit Judge. This appeal requires us to revisit the scene of an earlier battle. In Wine & Spirits Retailers, Inc. v. Rhode Island, 418 F.3d 36 (1st Cir.2005), we affirmed the district court’s denial of preliminary in-junctive relief against the enforcement of two amendments to Rhode Island’s statutory scheme governing in-state liquor sales a
Connecticut Fine Wine and Spirits LLC v. Seagullpublic domain
17-2003 Connecticut Fine Wine and Spirits LLC v. Seagull 1 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 6 August Term, 2017 7 8 (Argued: February 1, 2018 Decided: February 20, 2019 9 Amended: July 29, 2019) 10 11 Docket No. 17-2003-cv 12 13 14 CONNECTICUT FINE WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC, d/b/a, TOTAL WINE
Wine & Spirits Retailers, Inc. v. Rhode Islandpublic domain
SELYA, Circuit Judge. Rhode Island, like many states, regulates the intrastate channels through which alcoholic beverages may be manufactured, imported, and sold. One recently enacted piece of this regulatory mosaic prevents any franchisor or franchisee from holding a Class A retail liquor license. See R.I. Gen. Laws § 3-5-11.1. Another piece, enacted at the sa
Wiseman Park v. Southern Glazer's Wine and Spiritspublic domain
Filed 10/12/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO WISEMAN PARK, LLC, B266118 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC548599) v. SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC, Defendant and Respondent
Gordon, Robert B., J. This case arises out of the refusal of Beam Spirits & Wine, LLC (“Beam”) to sell a popular alcoholic beverage — the “Skinnygirl Margarita” — to a Massachusetts liquor wholesaler, United Liquors, LLC (“United”). Beam purchased the right to *259produce, market, promote, distribute and sell the Skinnygirl Margarita from Skinny Girl Cocktails, LLC (“
Gordon, Robert B., J. This case arises out of the refusal of Beam Spirits & Wine, LLC (“Beam”) to sell a popular alcoholic beverage — the “Skinnygirl Margarita” — to a Massachusetts liquor wholesaler, United Liquors, LLC (“United”). Beam purchased the right to produce, market, promote, distribute and sell the Skinnygirl Margarita from Skinny Girl Cocktails, LLC (“SGC”), a company formed by the brand’s celebrity creator (Bethe
Matter of White Plains Fine Wine & Spirits LLC v New York State Liq. Auth. (2020 NY Slip Op 03585) Matter of White Plains Fine Wine & Spirits LLC v New York State Liq. Auth. 2020 NY Slip Op 03585 Decided on June 25, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Depa
Clayton Byrd v. Tenn. Wine & Spirits Retailers Ass'npublic domain
SUTTON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Tennessee requires sellers of alcohol to have a retail license. To obtain a license, the applicant, including any officers and directors, must be "a bona fide resident of th[e] state during the two-year period immediately preceding" the application.
MFW Wine Co. LLC v. PA LCB, Aplt.public domain
[J-50A-2023 and J-50B-2023] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. MFW WINE CO., LLC, A6 WINE : No. 75 MAP 2022 COMPANY, AND GECC2 LLC D/B/A : BLOOMSDAY CAFE, : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court dated May 27, Appellees : 2022 at
Association of Washington Spirits & Wine Distributors v. Washington State Liquor Control Boardpublic domain
Wiggins, J. ¶1 We granted direct review of this challenge to the Washington State Liquor Control Board’s (Board) spirits distribution licensing fee structure brought by the Association of Washington Spirits and Wine Dis*346tributors (Association). The Association, a trade group composed of distributors licensed under RCW 66.24.055, challenges the Board’s decision to exemp
KRAUSER, J. After pleading guilty to selling an alcoholic beverage to “a person under [twenty-one] years of age” in violation of Md. Code (1957, 2001 RepLVol., 2002 Supp.), Art. 2B, § 12-108, an employee of appellee, Corridor Wine, Inc., t/a Corridor Wine & Spirits, was granted probation before judgment in the District Court of Maryland for Anne Arundel County. That led the Board of License Commissioners for Anne Arundel C
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SHIRAA. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION In an Opinion and Order on August 25, 2014 (“August 25 Order”), I granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ joint motion to dismiss.1 Both FTE and Defendants now move for partial reconsideration of the August 25 Order.2 In the alternativ
Siesta Village Market LLC v. Steenpublic domain
LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: This case primarily concerns a Texas law that allows alcohol retailers to ship to the door of their local consumers. OuWofTexas wine retailers claim that the dormant Commerce Clause requires they be given a supposedly reciprocal right to make direct shipments to any Texas consumer. The district court partly accepted their argument. We hold tha
Cherry Hill Vineyards, LLC v. Lillypublic domain
553 F.3d 423 (2008) CHERRY HILL VINEYARDS, LLC; William G. Schneider, Jr.; John D. Reilly, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Christopher L. LILLY, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Kentucky Office of Alcoholic Beverage Control, Defendant, Wine and Spirits Wholesalers of Kentucky, Inc., Intervening Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-5128. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.</
Cherry Hill Vineyard, LLC v. Baldaccipublic domain
505 F.3d 28 (2007) CHERRY HILL VINEYARD, LLC and Philip Brooks, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. John E. BALDACCI, in His Official Capacity as Governor of Maine, et al., Defendants, Appellees. No. 07-1513. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard September 5, 2007. Decided October 11, 2007. *29 James A. Tan
THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2025 WY 24 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2024 February 28, 2025 ROBERT E. SCHROTH and LINDA M. SCHROTH, Trustees of the ROBERT E. and LINDA M. SCHROTH REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST dated 8/20/2004; ANTHONY SCHROTH; and JACKSON HOLE WINERY, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, Appellants