⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Roberts v. Appellation Wine and Spirits, LLC”

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019-02-20 · Published · cited 1× · 932 F.3d 22
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: *24Connecticut Fine Wine and Spirits, d/b/a Total Wine & More ("Total Wine") appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Janet C. Hall, District Judge) dismissing its complaint against the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection ("DCP") and the Directo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019-02-20 · Published · cited 1× · 916 F.3d 160
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: *162 Connecticut Fine Wine and Spirits, d/b/a Total Wine & More ("Total Wine") appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Janet C. Hall, District Judge) dismissing its complaint against the Connecticu
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2017-10-12 · Published · cited 6× · 223 Cal. Rptr. 3d 802; 16 Cal. App. 5th 110; 2017 WL 4546070; 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 881
GOODMAN, J.* *113Wiseman Park, LLC (appellant) appeals from the judgment entered following the trial court sustaining the demurrer of Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits, LLC (respondent)1 to appellant's complaint without leave to amend. Appellant, the holder of a license to sell alcoholi
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019-09-06 · Published · cited 0× · 936 F.3d 119
17-2003 Connecticut Fine Wine and Spirits, LLC v. Seagull 17‐2003 Connecticut Fine Wine and Spirits, LLC v. Seagull United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 6th day of
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007-03-20 · Published · cited 113× · 481 F.3d 1; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 6412; 2007 WL 824397
SELYA, Senior Circuit Judge. This appeal requires us to revisit the scene of an earlier battle. In Wine & Spirits Retailers, Inc. v. Rhode Island, 418 F.3d 36 (1st Cir.2005), we affirmed the district court’s denial of preliminary in-junctive relief against the enforcement of two amendments to Rhode Island’s statutory scheme governing in-state liquor sales a
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019-07-29 · Published · cited 0×
17-2003 Connecticut Fine Wine and Spirits LLC v. Seagull 1 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 6 August Term, 2017 7 8 (Argued: February 1, 2018 Decided: February 20, 2019 9 Amended: July 29, 2019) 10 11 Docket No. 17-2003-cv 12 13 14 CONNECTICUT FINE WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC, d/b/a, TOTAL WINE
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005-08-10 · Published · cited 91× · 418 F.3d 36; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16718; 2005 WL 1876162
SELYA, Circuit Judge. Rhode Island, like many states, regulates the intrastate channels through which alcoholic beverages may be manufactured, imported, and sold. One recently enacted piece of this regulatory mosaic prevents any franchisor or franchisee from holding a Class A retail liquor license. See R.I. Gen. Laws § 3-5-11.1. Another piece, enacted at the sa
California Court of Appeal · 2017-10-12 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 10/12/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO WISEMAN PARK, LLC, B266118 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC548599) v. SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC, Defendant and Respondent
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2014-07-16 · Published · cited 0× · 32 Mass. L. Rptr. 258
Gordon, Robert B., J. This case arises out of the refusal of Beam Spirits & Wine, LLC (“Beam”) to sell a popular alcoholic beverage — the “Skinnygirl Margarita” — to a Massachusetts liquor wholesaler, United Liquors, LLC (“United”). Beam purchased the right to *259produce, market, promote, distribute and sell the Skinnygirl Margarita from Skinny Girl Cocktails, LLC (“
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2014-08-18 · Published · cited 0× · 32 Mass. L. Rptr. 433
Gordon, Robert B., J. This case arises out of the refusal of Beam Spirits & Wine, LLC (“Beam”) to sell a popular alcoholic beverage — the “Skinnygirl Margarita” — to a Massachusetts liquor wholesaler, United Liquors, LLC (“United”). Beam purchased the right to produce, market, promote, distribute and sell the Skinnygirl Margarita from Skinny Girl Cocktails, LLC (“SGC”), a company formed by the brand’s celebrity creator (Bethe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-06-25 · Published · cited 3× · 125 N.Y.S.3d 768; 184 A.D.3d 1068; 2020 NY Slip Op 3585
Matter of White Plains Fine Wine & Spirits LLC v New York State Liq. Auth. (2020 NY Slip Op 03585) Matter of White Plains Fine Wine & Spirits LLC v New York State Liq. Auth. 2020 NY Slip Op 03585 Decided on June 25, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Depa
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018-02-21 · Published · cited 26× · 883 F.3d 608
SUTTON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Tennessee requires sellers of alcohol to have a retail license. To obtain a license, the applicant, including any officers and directors, must be "a bona fide resident of th[e] state during the two-year period immediately preceding" the application.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
[J-50A-2023 and J-50B-2023] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. MFW WINE CO., LLC, A6 WINE : No. 75 MAP 2022 COMPANY, AND GECC2 LLC D/B/A : BLOOMSDAY CAFE, : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court dated May 27, Appellees : 2022 at
Washington Supreme Court · 2015-01-08 · Published · cited 97× · 182 Wash. 2d 342; 340 P.3d 849
Wiggins, J. ¶1 We granted direct review of this challenge to the Washington State Liquor Control Board’s (Board) spirits distribution licensing fee structure brought by the Association of Washington Spirits and Wine Dis*346tributors (Association). The Association, a trade group composed of distributors licensed under RCW 66.24.055, challenges the Board’s decision to exemp
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003-03-28 · Published · cited 0× · 150 Md. App. 275; 819 A.2d 1141; 2003 Md. App. LEXIS 39
KRAUSER, J. After pleading guilty to selling an alcoholic beverage to “a person under [twenty-one] years of age” in violation of Md. Code (1957, 2001 RepLVol., 2002 Supp.), Art. 2B, § 12-108, an employee of appellee, Corridor Wine, Inc., t/a Corridor Wine & Spirits, was granted probation before judgment in the District Court of Maryland for Anne Arundel County. That led the Board of License Commissioners for Anne Arundel C
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-09-05 · Published · cited 3× · 56 F. Supp. 3d 383; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124464; 2014 WL 4392535
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SHIRAA. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION In an Opinion and Order on August 25, 2014 (“August 25 Order”), I granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ joint motion to dismiss.1 Both FTE and Defendants now move for partial reconsideration of the August 25 Order.2 In the alternativ
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010-01-26 · Published · cited 0× · 595 F.3d 249; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 1760; 2010 WL 277786
LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: This case primarily concerns a Texas law that allows alcohol retailers to ship to the door of their local consumers. OuWofTexas wine retailers claim that the dormant Commerce Clause requires they be given a supposedly reciprocal right to make direct shipments to any Texas consumer. The district court partly accepted their argument. We hold tha
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008-12-24 · Published · cited 41× · 553 F.3d 423; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 26086; 2008 WL 5396257
553 F.3d 423 (2008) CHERRY HILL VINEYARDS, LLC; William G. Schneider, Jr.; John D. Reilly, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Christopher L. LILLY, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Kentucky Office of Alcoholic Beverage Control, Defendant, Wine and Spirits Wholesalers of Kentucky, Inc., Intervening Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-5128. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.</
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007-10-11 · Published · cited 48× · 505 F.3d 28; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 23819; 2007 WL 2949312
505 F.3d 28 (2007) CHERRY HILL VINEYARD, LLC and Philip Brooks, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. John E. BALDACCI, in His Official Capacity as Governor of Maine, et al., Defendants, Appellees. No. 07-1513. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard September 5, 2007. Decided October 11, 2007. *29 James A. Tan
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2025-02-28 · Published · cited 3× · 564 P.3d 570; 2025 WY 24
THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2025 WY 24 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2024 February 28, 2025 ROBERT E. SCHROTH and LINDA M. SCHROTH, Trustees of the ROBERT E. and LINDA M. SCHROTH REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST dated 8/20/2004; ANTHONY SCHROTH; and JACKSON HOLE WINERY, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, Appellants