Cases

[Cite as Jefferson Child Support Enforcement Agency v. Roberts, 2016-Ohio-8216.] STATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT JEFFERSON COUNTY CHILD ) SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, ) ON BEHALF OF: THE STATE OF ) FLORIDA, ET REL., TYRA ELAINE ) ROBERTS, MOTHER AND NE

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.

PISANSKY, J.S.C. This matter requires the court to determine the outcomes of three pending motions. The first is a motion to vacate default judgment filed by defendant Child Support Enforcement Administration (“CSEA”) on September 18, 2013. The second, also filed on September 18, 2013, is CSEA’s motion to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Robert Triffin (“Triffin”), or in the alternative, to grant defendant summary judgment

PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of appellee’s confession of error, we vacate the final order and remand for further proceedings. B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and LEWIS and . , ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.

ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Chief Judge | Appellant Edgar D. Miller appeals the February 18, 2014 order of the Pulaski County Circuit Court modifying his child-support obligation to his adult child, C.M., based on C.M.’s special-needs status and inability to care for himself, and awarding retroactive support from May 12, 1998, through January 24, 2014. He argues tha

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and RAY,. JJ., concur.

82 So.3d 1227 (2012) Demetrius WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM obo Ashley D. ROBERTS, Appellee. No. 1D11-3740. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. March 28, 2012. Demetrius Washington, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorne

PER CURIAM. Because the proceedings below cannot be transcribed and the parties report that they are unable to prepare a statement of the evidence or proceedings, the final administrative support order on appeal is vacated and this cause is remanded for a hearing de novo. See Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). PADOVANO, THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

PER CURIAM: Robert Love Taylor, Jr. appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus show cause. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Taylor v. State of Va. Div. of Child Support Enforcement, No. 1:10-cv-00803LMB-TCB (E.D.Va. July 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

241 S.W.3d 771 (2006) OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT & Anita Gauvey, Appellants v. Robert W. GAUVEY, Appellee. No. CA 06-103. Court of Appeals of Arkansas. October 25, 2006. Mark L. Ross, Attorney for OCSE State of Arkansas, Ark. Dep't of Finance & Admin., Little Rock, for appellant. Hilburn, Calhoon, Harper, Pruniski & Calhoun, Ltd., by: Tra

PER CURIAM. Edwin Ford, III, appeals a final administrative support order. Counsel for ap-pellee Department of Revenue has filed a confession of error, agreeing that further proceedings in the lower tribunal are necessary. Accordingly, the order on appeal is hereby vacated and the matter is remanded to the agency for further administrative proceedings, as appropriate. REVERSED. BENTON

262 S.W.3d 290 (2008) Sheena TAYLOR, Respondent; Robert C. Taylor, Respondent, v. STATE of Missouri, DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Appellant. No. WD 68607. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. September 2, 2008. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Rachel B. Ommerman, Joins on the briefs, Jefferson City, MO, for appellant. Before JAMES M;

66 So.3d 408 (2011) Deangelo SHORTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM, Appellee. No. 1D11-1735. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. August 4, 2011. Deangelo Shorts, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for A

STEELMAN, Judge. Service of process was made by a person that was qualified to make service under Rule of Civil Procedure 4. The affidavit of service was not fatally vague as to the method of service because competent evidence supported a factual finding that the process server personally delivered a copy of the summons and complaint to the defendant. The trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss for

23 So.3d 219 (2009) Keith M. DURAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM, o/b/o, Rachel M. ASHE, Appellee. No. 1D09-4597. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. December 8, 2009. Keith M. Duran, pro se, Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney Genera

679 S.E.2d 151 (2009) STATE of North Carolina by and Through the ALBEMARLE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, EX. REL., Shawn L. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. Robert B. EASON, Defendant. No. COA08-1432. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. July 7, 2009. *152 Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Gerald K. Robbins, Special Deputy Attorney Gener

Josephine Linker Hart, Judge. Appellant, Robert Leroy Coker, appeals from the entry of a final order of adoption denying his motion to dismiss the petition for adoption.1 On December 10, 1996, appellant and his then-wife, Rhonda Coker, filed a petition for adoption in which appellant sought to adopt the minor child and son of Rhonda Coker, Heath Ralston. The petition noted tha

736 A.2d 954 (1999) Daniel M. LINN, Respondent-Below, Appellant, v. DELAWARE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and Carol J. Toman, Petitioners-Below, Appellees. No. 520, 1997. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: May 4, 1999. Decided: August 2, 1999. Robert C. McDonald and Barbara J. Gadbois (argued), Borin & McDonald, Wilmington, DE, for Appellant.

95 S.W.3d 136 (2003) Shelly WERTHS, Plaintiff, Donald Bradley, Respondent-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Appellant-Respondent. Nos. WD 60201, WD 60334. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. January 28, 2003. *138 Robert D. Noland, Kansas City, for Appellant-Respondent. Troy Dennis

PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge. The Division of Child Support Enforcement appeals the circuit court’s judgment denying the division’s motions to intervene and to set aside an order. Renauld Shelton argues that the division was already a party to the action and that the circuit court did not err in denying the motion to set aside. We remand the case to the circuit court with instructions. In an order dated January 23