Cases

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2042 Doc: 42 Filed: 02/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 48 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2042 SHELLEY C., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

820 F.Supp.2d 721 (2011) Mark A. HAZEL, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Case No. 9:10-cv-02488-RMG. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Beaufort Division. September 28, 2011. *722 Robertson H. Wendt, Jr., Robertson Wendt Law Office, N. Charleston, SC, for Plaintiff. Mar

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1540 ESIN E. ARAKAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Timothy M. Cain, Distr

282 F.Supp.2d 1206 (2003) Linda FALK, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. No. 02-2294-DJW. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 16, 2003. *1207 *1208 *1209 Robert D. Linscott, Kansas City, MO, for Plain

MEMORANDUM OPINION Jane M. Virden, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This cause is before the Court on Plaintiffs complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying claims for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the pro

RILEY, Circuit Judge. Martha Hillier (Hillier) appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits (SSDI) and supplemental security income (SSI) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (Act), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-434, 1381-1383f. We affirm.

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: The petitioner filed for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits for her four-year-old daughter Yvonne, claiming Yvonne was disabled. Yvonne suffers from sickle cell disease, as a result of which she occasionally suffers vaso-occlu-sive crises, which are painful episode[s] in the life of a person affected with sick

PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Murphree, who is white, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Social Security Administration (the “Agency”) in his employment-discrimination and retaliation lawsuit filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16. Murphree is long-term employee with the Agency who, at the time of the events giving rise to this case, was a District Man

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Julio Roman v. Civil No. 18-cv-787-PB Opinion No. 2019 DNH 111 Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration O R D E R Julio Roman moves to reverse the decision of the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) to deny his applica

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-2837 ___________ Martha Hillier, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court fo

LUCERO, Circuit Judge. Claimant Patrick K. Miller appeals from the district court’s order affirming the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits. 1 The issue on appeal is whether the record contains substantial evidence to support the administrative law judge’s (ALJ) conclusion that claimant was not

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we review the district court’s order affirming an Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of a claimant’s request for disability consideration and disability insurance benefits under sections 216(i) and 223 of the Social Security Act, as amended. 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423 (Supp. 1995). The dist

OPINION & ORDER HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Plaintiff, Sherry F. Robertson, seeks legal and equitable ' damages from Defendant, Standard Insurance Company, under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiff received long-term- disability (LTD) insurance benefits and a waiver-of-premium of a life insurance policy benefit from Defendant from

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. HEYBURN, District Judge. The Court now considers a variety of motions concerning the Louisville-South*991ern Indiana Ohio River Bridges Project (the “Project”). In general, Defendants, the Federal Highway Administration (“FHA”), the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (“Kentucky”), the Indiana Department of Trans

280 F.Supp.2d 743 (2002) Michael ROSEN; Barbara Huskey; Emanuel Martin by his next friend, Cheryl Martin; Wanda Campbell; Connie Hoilman; Mark Hughes; Jacob B. by his next friend, Martin B.; Jackie Baggett; Brenda Clabo; Pradie Tibbs, Original Plaintiffs, and Gayle Cummings; Bach Thuy Nguyen; Di Nguyen; Sherry Justice; Sean Addison by his next friend, Lisa Addison; Lorri Griffin; Melanie Jackson; and Wilson Dale Jackson on their own behalf and on beh

69 F.3d 548 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Don

17 F.Supp.2d 975 (1998) Kelly S. GRANT, Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMIN., Kenneth S. Apfel, Acting Commissioner, Defendant. No. 4:97CV3251. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. September 11, 1998. *976 James D. Leach, Viken, Viken Law Firm, Rapid City, SD, for Plaintiff. *977

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correct

POSNER, Chief Judge. This is an appeal from a decision by the district court affirming the denial of social security disability benefits to Kathryn Groves. Groves is a middle-aged woman who has chronic degenerative disc disease in several of her spinal discs and has had two operations on her spine. After working for many years as an x-ray technician, she quit in 1990 allegedly b

PER CURIAM: Robert P. Kinash has suffered from ailments affecting his hands, experienced pain and discomfort in his feet, and lost the ability *738 to hear high frequencies. He filed an initial request for disability benefits under Title II of the Social’ Security Act on May 11, 1981, alleging that