Cases

ORDER HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced consolidated action, alleging Defendants’ usurious “payday loans” transacted under pretext as sales of advertising, violate the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601 et seq., as interpreted by the Federal Reserve Board in implementing Regulation Z, 12 C.R.R. § 226, the Racketeer Influenced and Cor

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in H-01-3913 inter alia is Plaintiffs Enron Creditors Recovery Corp. (“Enron”) and the Administrative Committee of the Enron Corp. Savings Plan’s (“Administrative Committee’s”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs’ ”) motion to compel production of documents (# 1420) responsive to Plaintiffs’ June 10, 2008 requests for produ

762 F.Supp.2d 942 (2010) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. American National Insurance Company, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Arthur Andersen, LLP, et al., Defendants. No. MDL-1446, Civil Action Nos. H-01-3624, G-03-0967. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division.

258 F.Supp.2d 576 (2003) In Re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA LITIGATION" This Document Relates to: All Cases Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants The Regents of The University of California, et al., Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. Lay, et al., Defendants. No. MD-1446, CIV.A.H-01-3624.

310 F.Supp.2d 819 (2004) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants The Regents of the University of California, et al., Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. Lay, et al., Defendants. No. MDL-1446, CIV.A. H-01-3624. United States District

586 F.Supp.2d 732 (2008) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. No. MDL-1446. Civ.A. No. H-01-3624. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 8, 2008. *735 Richard J. Zook, Cunningham Darlow e

235 F.Supp.2d 549 (2002) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & ERISA LITIGATION. This Document Relates to All Cases. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. The Regents of the University of California, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. Lay, et al., Defendants. MDL No. 1446 Civil Action No. H-01-36

ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 6, 2013 Session LARRY BURCHFIELD ET AL. v. TIMOTHY J. RENFREE, M.D. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 2-412-08 Harold Wimberly, Judge No. E2012-01582-COA-R3-CV-FILED-OCTOBER 18, 2013 This is a health care liability action wherein the trial by jury resulted in a judgment for th

Filed 8/30/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO JENNIFER SARKANY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A162441 v. CHRISTIE WEST et al., (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CGC 18-571355) Defendants and

Filed 2/13/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DAVID CHAI, H051485 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 20CV373916) v. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, et al., Defendants and Respo

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

ACCEPTED 01-14-00776-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/20/2015 6:05:32 PM

23 Cal.App.4th 1442 (1994) 29 Cal. Rptr.2d 103 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ALAN T. SASAKI, as Auditor-Controller, etc., Defendant and Respondent; ANTHONY L. MILLER, as Acting Secretary of State, etc., et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents. Docket No. B077722. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

Opinion issued November 26, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00827-CV ——————————— JASON ALEXANDER, JOE MCADAMS, ELIAS ABRAHAM, LAWRENCE ANDERSON, LISA ASTIN, JORGE ATENCIO, DAVID AYRE, DOUGLAS AUSTIN, JAMES BARCLIFT, MARTIN BENSON, MARIA BLACKWELL, T

OPINION RODENBERG, Judge. Appellant Wayzata Nissan, LLC challenges the district court’s denial of a temporary restraining order against respondents Stephen McDaniels, EP Motors, Inc., McEP Investments, LLC, and Nissan North America, Inc., seeking to enjoin relocation of a Nissan dealership to a new location within ten miles of appellant’s existing dealers

Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI

BOLICK, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. ¶30 I agree with the majority that the Arizona Corporation Commission has no authority "to regulate the condemnation of water utilities," the narrow question the City presented to us on special action review, and that the City has standing to pursue the action. However, the Court goes further to divest the Commission of authority to

OPINION WRIGHT, Justice. In May 2014, motor vehicle manufacturer Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) and prospective,-.Nissan dealer- Stephen *282 McDaniels 1 sought to relocate a Nissan dealership from Bloomington to a

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr