Cases

694 Submitted April 19, affirmed May 18, 2022 CRESENCIO GARCIA-ROCIO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Sue WASHBURN, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Defendant-Respondent. Umatilla County Circuit Court 18CV58898; A175452 510 P3d 292 J. Burdette Pratt,

The state's petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Anderson, 363 Or. 392, 423 P.3d 43 (2018).

275 Submitted on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court March 26, 2019, reversed and remanded June 16, 2021 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BALTAZAR GARCIA-ROCIO, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court C122337CR; A154601

NUMBER 13-18-00373-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ROCIO RIVERA GARCIA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 206th District Court

Review Denied.

ARMSTRONG, P. J., dissenting. I disagree with the majority that the trial court failed to exercise its discretion under OEC 403 when it admitted the three challenged portions of the police interview with defendant. I would conclude that, considering all the attendant circumstances, the record does reflect that the trial court consciously engaged in the OEC 403 balancing that State v. Mayfield, 302 Or 63

DUNCAN, J. pro tempore Defendant appeals judgments in two consolidated cases—Washington County Circuit Court Case Numbers C122303CR and C131573CR—in which he was convicted of multiple sexual offenses against two victims.1 Defendant raises six assignments of error. As explained below, we reject all but defendant’s fourth assignment of error, which pertains to Case Number C131

NUMBER 13-07-00380-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________ ENER RENE GARCIA, Appellant, v. ROCIO RIVERA GARCIA, Appellee. __________________________________________

NUMBER 13-07-00380-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG __________________________

HAZOURI, J. Rocío Garcia, a minor, by and through her parent and best friend, Laura Garcia, and Laura Garcia and Armando Garcia, her parents (“Garcia”), appeal a final summary judgment entered in favor of the City of Hollywood (“City”). This case involves personal injuries sustained by the minor, Rocio Garcia, who as a pedestrian was struck by a vehicle owned by the City and operated by one of its police officers, Sergeant N

MEMORANDUM ** Maria Salazar-Gareia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial, as untimely and without merit, of her motion to reopen proceedings in order to apply for protection under the Convention Against Torture following the denial of her application for cancellation of removal. *855

MEMORANDUM ** Erika Del Rocio Ponce Garcia seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying Ponce *756Garcia’s application for cancellation of removal and denying her motion to remand. We review de novo claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings. See Ra

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. A group of employees filed class and collective actions against Tyson Foods, Inc., seeking unpaid wages for time spent on pre- and post-shift activities. After the employees obtained a sizeable verdict and fee award, 1 Tyson unsuccessfully moved for judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, Tys

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § THE STATE OF TEXAS, No. 08-24-00240-CR § Appellant, Appeal from

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Rocío Chavez pled guilty to misuse of a social security number, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(B). Her conditional plea allows this appeal. Chavez alleges that the district court should have dismissed the indictment because her arrest and detention violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(a). Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this cou

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under

966 So.2d 5 (2007) Rocio GARCIA, a minor, by and through her parent and best friend, Laura Garcia, and Laura Garcia and Armando Garcia, her parents, Appellants, v. CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D06-970. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. June 6, 2007. Arnold R. Ginsberg of Ginsberg & Schwart

Kensington Ins. Co. v Ramales (2020 NY Slip Op 00922) Kensington Ins. Co. v Ramales 2020 NY Slip Op 00922 Decided on February 6, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 06-3739 ROCIO MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, SERGIO ESCOBEDO, FERNANDO GARCIA, and JOSE MENDEZ, Defendants-Appellees. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court

LUI, P. J. *149*276In this case we must determine whether the Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission (Commission) has jurisdiction to rule on matters not delegated to it by the Charter of the County of Los Angeles (Charter). We conclude the Commission