Cases

Sykes, Circuit Judge. *511 Judy Dilley and Abigail Brown were injured while horseback riding in Wisconsin. Both women are citizens of other states, so they sued the trail and stable operators in federal court in western Wisconsin asserting claims of negligence. They lost at summary judgmen

FREDERICK J. KAPALA, District Judge Plaintiffs, City of Rockford, Illinois, and Acument Global Technologies Inc., filed a second amended complaint (the "SAC") against two groups of defendants: (1) Mallinckrodt plc and Mallinckrodt ARD, Inc. *743(including its acquisition of "Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.") (collectively, "Mall

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1761 MONICA L. RONGERE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ROCKFORD, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern D

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur

Justice PATTERSON delivered the opinion of the Court. On August 24, 2007, officers from the Manalapan Police Department executed a search warrant at the home that defendant John J. Rockford, III shared with his parents. Based upon an investí*431gation that included surveillance, officers suspected defendant of conducting a drug distribution operation i

75-80 Properties, LLC et al. v. Rale, Inc. et al., No. 1689, Sept. Term, 2017. Opinion by Arthur, J. STATUTORY INTERPERTATION – EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS Md. Code (2014), § 5-859(b) of the General Provisions Article requires a member of Frederick County’s governing body who “communicates ex parte with an individual concerning a pending application during the pendency of that application” to disclose the communication. This statute requires the disclosure of any ex parte communication with an ind

*596 OPINION GILDEA, Chief Justice. The question presented in this case is whether a municipality is entitled to vicarious official immunity for the allegedly negligent acts that its non-employee City Engineer — a private engineering firm— performed under a contract with the munici

75-80 Properties, LLC et al. v. Rale, Inc. et al., No. 1689, Sept. Term, 2017. Opinion by Arthur, J. STATUTORY INTERPERTATION – EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS Md. Code (2014), § 5-859(b) of the General Provisions Article requires a member of Frederick County’s governing body who “communicates ex parte with an individual concerning a pending application during the pendency of that application” to disclose the communication. This statute requires the disclosure of any ex parte communication with an ind

[Cite as Rockford Homes, Inc. v. Canal Winchester City Council, 2014-Ohio-3609.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Rockford Homes, Inc., : Appellant-Appellee, : No. 14AP-89 v. : (M.C. No. 2013 EVA-60081) Cit

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this

ORDER Illinois resident Jean Dixon sued the City of Rockford, the County of Winnebago, and Joe Behr & Sons, Inc., claiming that they violated her civil rights when they tried to take her property, caused air and water pollution, permitted the police to break into her house “to save my life,” and harassed her by “buII-doz[ing]” her garden and poisoning her plants. The district court screened her complaint. See 28 U.S.C. §

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Cross-Defendant -Counter-Claimant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant Rockford Funding Corporation (“Rockford”) appeals from a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Shirley Wohl Kram, Judge), entered on December 3, 2004, granting the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendan t-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee Dolgencorp, Inc. (“Dolgencorp”) on Rockford’s cros

OPINION SMITH, Judge. We affirm the district court’s dismissal of respondents’ negligent-approval claims on the basis of statutory immunity and their negligent-design claims on the basis that contractors hired to • perform city functions are protected by common-law official immunity. But we reverse and remand the district court’s denial of appellant’s sum

BOONSTRA, J. This is a consolidated appeal involving a claim under the “sewage disposal system event” exception to the governmental tort liability act (GTLA), MCL 691.1401 et seq. In Docket No. 320683, defendant Rockford Public Schools (RPS) appeals by right the trial court’s order denying RPS’s motion for summary disposition, in which RPS had argued that plaintif

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-14-00493-CV Industrial Product Formulators of America, Inc., Appellant v. Rockford Business Interiors, Inc., Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-12-003380, HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORAN

On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 53A04-1511-CT-1880 Slaughter, Justice. Dismissal under Trial Rule 12(B)(6) is rarely appropriate when the asserted ground for dismissal is an affirmative defense. To withstand a 12(B)(6) dismissal, the complaint need only allege such facts that, if proved,

608 N.W.2d 903 (2000) ROCKFORD TOWNSHIP, Appellant, v. CITY OF ROCKFORD, Respondent, Minnesota Diversified Products, Inc., intervenor, Respondent. No. C0-99-1775. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. April 11, 2000. *905 Thomas P. Melloy, Christopher W. Harmoning, Hall & Byers, P.A., St. Cloud (for appellant). Paula A. C

JUSTICE BOWMAN delivered the opinion of the court: After petitioner, A.P. Properties, Inc. (A.P.), purchased the delinquent real estate taxes of a residential property located in Gurnee, the taxes were redeemed by respondent, Ezra Chaim Properties, LLC (Ezra). A.E petitioned to expunge the redemption, and Ezra moved for summary judgment. The Lake County circuit court granted

RENDERED: JANUARY 10, 2025; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2023-CA-1338-MR LP LOUISVILLE QUINN DRIVE, LLC D/B/A SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE AT ROCKFORD REHAB AND WELLNESS CENTER; LPO HOLDINGS, LLC; AGEMO HOLDINGS, LLC; LPSNF, LLC; SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE CLINICAL CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC; JJLA, LLC; SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC; SHC KY HOLDINGS, LLC; SHC LP H

781 N.W.2d 145 (2009) 286 Mich. App. 624 CITY OF ROCKFORD v. 63RD DISTRICT COURT. Docket No. 287501. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted October 6, 2009, at Lansing. Decided December 29, 2009, at 9:25 a.m. *147 Law, Weathers & Richardson, P.C. (by Steven F. Stapleton and Crystal L.