Cases

4 A.3d 1027 (2010) 416 N.J. Super. 391 STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John ENRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant. No. A-4630-08T4. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted April 13, 2010. Decided August 19, 2010. *1029 John Menzel, Point Pleasant, attorney for appe

330 S.W.3d 392 (2010) Michael ENRIGHT, Appellant, v. GOODMAN DISTRIBUTION, INC., Appellee. No. 14-09-00759-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). November 16, 2010. *394 Gabe T. Vick, Michael E. Pierce, Robert Pitard Wynne, Matthew Paul Skrabanek, Houston, for appellant. S. Shawn Stephens, Gregory C. Ulmer, R

Affirmed and Opinion filed November 16, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GUSTAVO A. GELPI, United States District Judge Plaintiffs, eleven correctional officers,2 sued Defendants, the United States, et al.,3 *496under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) and for violating rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution under

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

777 F.Supp. 1043 (1991) Raul F. RODRIGUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BANCO CENTRAL, et al., Defendants. No. Civ. 82-1835 (JAF). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 10, 1991. *1044 *1045 *1046 Francisco López-Romo, Harry Woods, Woods & Woo

ORDER The opinion filed May 10, 1990, is hereby WITHDRAWN. The opinion submitted herewith shall be filed in its stead. *440 OPINION CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge: Miguel Rodriguez-Castro challenges the sentence imposed upon hi

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4361-19 A-4371-19 A-4374-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION August 25, 2021 v.

945 F.2d 411 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. De

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY OR ENJOIN ARBITRATION HAIGHT, Senior District Judge: This declaratory action pits the owner of a Bahamas-flag ocean going passenger ship against the American affiliate of a Danish supplier of marine fuel oils who contracted with the shipowner to fuel the vessel at a Greek port, and initiated arbitration proceedings in London when the

STRINE, Chief Justice: I. INTRODUCTION These appeals were scheduled for argument on the same day because they turn on a single legal question: in an action for damages against corporate fiduciaries, where the plaintiff challenges an interested transaction that is presumptively subject to entire fairness review, must the plaintiff plead a non-exculpated claim against the disinterested, independent direc

919 F.2d 137 Thomas (Isaac W.)v.State of New Jersey, Jersey City, New Jersey, Jersey CityPolice Department, Bilder (Hon. Lawrence), Ruvoldt (HaroldJ., Jr.), Greene (Mr.), McRee (Warren), Pizzelanti(Officer), Enright (Officer) Moran (Officer), Vogel(Officer), DePalma (Nicholas), Kline (Paul), Van Ness(Stanley), Penn (Arthur), Rodriguez (Joseph), De Ceronimo(Joseph), Winograd (Mayer) NO. 90-55

[Cite as State ex. rel. Chatman v. Galion Police Dept., 2023-Ohio-4177.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY STATE EX. REL. DAVID CHATMAN, CASE NO. 9-22-48 RELATOR, v. GALION POLICE DEPARTMENT, OPINION RESPONDENT.

OPINION ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice. This is a multi-party appeal from a judgment in a medical and chiropractic malpractice case. Maria G. Thompson' sued Jaime Stolar, M.D., Luis Marioni, D.C., and Alivio Medical Center and Alivio Treatment Centers, P.A. (collectively referred to as “Alivio”) due to knee injuries allegedly caused by treatment she received. For the reasons that follow, we r

DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Defendants-Appellants Darren Hill (“Hill”) and Lloyd Dodwell (“Dodwell”) (collectively, “Defendants”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motions to suppress. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. I. A. This appeal arises out of a traffic stop executed by Henderson County,

TSOUCALAS, Judge: Defendants-appellants Nelson Luis Millet, Manuel E. Roman, Richard Morales, Hector Luis Rios, Maria Vidro, Johnny Zapata, Robert Burgos, Francisco Soto (“F.Soto”), Alexis Antuna, Luis Noel Cruz, Edgar Rodriguez (“E.Rodriguez”), Edward Calderon and Gilberto Rivera (“G.Rivera”), appeal from judgments entered, following jury trials or plea agreements, in the United States District Court for the District of Con

USCA4 Appeal: 23-4150 Doc: 74 Filed: 05/14/2025 Pg: 1 of 25 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-4150 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. VINCENT DERITIS, Defendant -

608 F.Supp. 644 (1985) Paul E. MERRELL, Plaintiff, v. Lee THOMAS,[1] Defendant, and Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Dow Chemical Company, Velsicol Chemical Corporation, National Agricultural Chemicals Association and Oregonians For Food & Shelter, Inc., Defendant-Intervenors. Civ. No. 84-6185-E. United States District Court, D. Oregon. May 15, 1985. <

TRAXLER, Circuit Judge: Brian Bowman appeals the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence recovered from a dog sniff conducted after an already-completed traffic stop. We conclude that the police officer had neither Bowman's consent to extend the traffic stop nor a reasonable, articulable suspicion of ongoing criminal activity to justify doing so. Accordingly, the prol

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4253 Doc: 46 Filed: 05/03/2023 Pg: 1 of 35 Certiorari granted by Supreme Court, July 2, 2024 Vacated and remanded by Supreme Court, July 2, 2024 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-4253 UNITED STA