Cases

Honorable Edmond E. Chang, United States District Judge *1001Under the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act, a private entity cannot collect or store certain kinds of biometric information, including face-geometry scans, without first obtaining consent or providing certain disclosures. 740 ILCS 14/1 et seq. Plaintiffs Lindabeth Rivera and Joseph Weiss both allege

Memorandum Opinion and Order Honorable Edmond E. Chang, United States District Judge The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act forbids the unauthorized collection and storing of some types of biometric data. 740ILCS 14/1 et seq. A private entity cannot gather and use someone’s “biometric identifier”—defined as retinal or iris scans, fingerprints, voiceprints, or hand or face geometry scans—un

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 617–622 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 18, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: Google Play Store Antitrust No. 24-6256 Litigation D.C. Nos. ______________________________ 3:21-md-02981-JD _ 3:20-cv-05671-JD EPIC GAMES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, OPINION Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GOOGLE LLC; GOOGL

Filed 9/21/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR JOHN DOE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A157097 v. (City & County of San Francisco GOOGLE, INC., et al., Super. Ct. No. CGC-16-556034 & Coordina

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE GOOGLE INC. STREET VIEW No. 20-15616 ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS LITIGATION, D.C. No. 3:10-md-02184- CRB BENJAMIN JOFFE; LILLA MARIGZA; RICK BENITTI; BERTHA DAVIS; JASON TAYLOR; ERIC MYHRE; JOHN OPINION E. REDSTONE; MATTHEW BERLAGE; PATRICK KEYES; KARL H. SCHU

Case: 15-60205 Document: 00513458158 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/08/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-60205 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED GOOGLE, INCORPORATED,

WALLACE, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur in Sections I and III of the majority opinion. I agree that a cy pres-only settlement was appropriate in ‘this case and do not contend that the district court abused its discretion in calculating class counsel’s fees. I dissent, however, from Section II of the opinion,

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: In response to Google’s petition for panel rehearing, the opinion of the court is *216 sued on April 8, 2016, at 2016 WL 1397765, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted. The petition for rehearing is otherwise DENIED. Mississippi’s

ORDER ON PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION This is a patent infringement action in which plaintiff Word to Info, Inc. (“WTI”) accuses defendant Google, Inc. of infringing seven related patents claiming techniques for natural language processing,1 Google filed this partial motion to dismiss

*1126ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS AND INCENTIVE AWARDS Re: Dkt. Nos. 65, 66 EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge This consolidated internet privacy litigation against Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”) returns for final approval of a class action settlement.

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VII SANDRA E. ROSA Certiorari RODRÍGUEZ procedente del Tribunal de Primera Recurrida Instancia, Sala

Elite Wine & Spirit LLC v Michelangelo Preserv. LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 00631) Elite Wine & Spirit LLC v Michelangelo Preserv. LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 00631 Decided on February 07, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department GONZ LEZ, J.

Elite Wine & Spirit LLC v Michelangelo Preserv. LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 00631) Elite Wine & Spirit LLC v Michelangelo Preserv. LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 00631 Decided on February 07, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department GONZÁLEZ, J.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. WILLOWOOD, LLC, WILLOWOOD USA, LLC, WILLOWOOD AZOXYSTROBIN, LLC, WILLOWOOD LIMITED, Defendants-Cross-Appellants ______________________ 2018-1614, 2018-2044 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District

OPINION AND ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS, District Judge. Plaintiffs Capitol Records, LLC, Caroline Records, Inc., Virgin Records America, Inc. (collectively, “Capitol”), EMI Blackwood Music, Inc., EMI April Music, Inc., EMI Virgin Music Inc., ColgemsEMI Music, Inc., EMI Virgin Songs, Inc., EMI Gold Horizon Music Corp., EMI U Catalog, Inc., EMI Unart Catalog, Inc., Jobete Music Co., Inc. and Stone Diamond M

Yanky v 2839 Bainbridge Ave. Assoc. LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 00301) Yanky v 2839 Bainbridge Ave. Assoc. LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 00301 Decided on January 21, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BROIDY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC et al., Plaintiffs, No. 19-cv-150 (DLF) v. NICOLAS D. MUZIN et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Broidy Capital Management, LLC, and Elliott Broidy (together, “Broidy”) brought this suit

NUMBER 13-22-00519-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ROBERT GARCIA, Appellant, v. EXTREME TACTICS AND TRAINING SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 40TH DISTRICT COURT OF

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) C.A. No.: N21C-03-257 EMD ) Plaintiffs, ) )