Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Rodriguez v. Graham Shoe Corp.”
United States v. Reginald Grahampublic domain
USCA11 Case: 19-10332 Document: 302-1 Date Filed: 12/02/2024 Page: 1 of 142 19-10332 Opinion of the Court 1 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-10332 _______
Maldonado v. Rodriguezpublic domain
Randy Crane, United States District Judge *758I. Introduction Now before the Court are: the Motion to Dismiss filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) by Defendants Hidalgo County, Texas (the "County") and Ricardo Rodriguez, Jr. ("Rodriguez"), in his individual and official capacities as Hidalgo County Distric
Graham v. Sabolpublic domain
734 F.Supp.2d 194 (2010) Emmett Madison GRAHAM, Jr., Petitioner, v. Carolyn A. SABOL, et al., Respondents. Civil Action No. 08-40208-MBB. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. August 12, 2010. *197 Emmett Madison Graham, Jr., Devens, MA, pro se. Christine J. Wichers, United States Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, f
Graham v. Barrigerpublic domain
699 F.Supp.2d 612 (2010) Martha GRAHAM, Maria Grimaldi, Lloyd Heller, Paula Manzolillo, and Creamton Maple Trust f/b/o Carl Mills, Plaintiffs, v. Lloyd V. BARRIGER, the Estate of Andrew McKean, Linda Barriger, the Gaffken & Barriger Fund LLC, G & B Partners, Inc, Barriger and Barriger Inc., Barriger Capital Inc., Gitlin & Associates, LLP, Irwin Gitlin, and John Doe (the Unknown Individual or Legal Entity Which Acted as Auditor for the
Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los Angelespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HERIBERTO RODRIGUEZ; CARLOS No. 13-56292 FLORES; JUAN CARLOS SANCHEZ; ERICK NUNEZ; JUAN TRINIDAD, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 2:10-cv-06342- CBM-AJW v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Defendants, and DANIEL CRUZ; MATTHEW ONHEMUS;
OPINION Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice This appeal arises out of a dispute among companies involved in making or receiving structured-settlement payments. The trial court disposed of all claims by granting various summary-judgment motions, except for the defendants’ request for attorney’s fees. Following jury findings as to the amount of reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees, the trial court rendere
Lymon v. Aramark Corp.public domain
728 F.Supp.2d 1222 (2010) Davon LYMON, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK CORPORATION, Joseph Neubauer, Charlie Carrizales, Wexford Corporation, John Sanchez in his Official Capacity and Individual Capacity, Abner Hernandez in his Official and Individual Capacity, Joe Williams as Secretary of the New Mexico Department of Corrections in his Individual and Official Capacity, and the New Mexico Department of Corrections, Defendants. No. CIV
ACCEPTED 03-14-00717-CV 3677007 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/7/2015 10:35:57 AM
MEMORANDUM ** Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company and Fireman’s Fund McGee Marine Underwriters (“Fireman’s Fund”) appeal from the district court’s order granting Sonitrol, Inc.’s (“Sonitrol”) motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Fireman’s Fund contends that it is entitled to equitable subrogation of a claim arising out of Sonitrol’s alleged failure to perform its contractual duty
ACCEPTED 13-15-00167-CV FILED THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS
Mohamed v. Mazda Motor Corp.public domain
90 F.Supp.2d 757 (2000) Abdul Ali MOHAMED, Individually And As Next Friend For, Shehrazade Mohamed, A Minor Child, And As Representative of the Estate of Dr. Khaduah Abdul Ali Mohamed, Plaintiffs, v. MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION, and Mazda Motor of America, Inc., Defendants. No. 2:99-CV-0231(TH). United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division. March 27, 2000.
ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV 4848348 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV 5659167 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV 5659032 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV 4853036 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXA
ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV SEE AMENDED BRF 5648230 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS FILED ON 6/15/15 AUSTIN, TEXAS
Fortenberry v. Foxworth Corp.public domain
825 F.Supp. 1265 (1993) Floyce L. FORTENBERRY, As Conservator of the Estate of Frank Adams Fortenberry, Plaintiff, v. FOXWORTH CORPORATION and Thomas "Arny" Rhoden, Individually and As a Director and Officer of the Foxworth Corporation, Defendants. Civ. A. No. H90-0116(W). United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Hattiesburg Division. June 9, 1993.
Holcombe v. United Statespublic domain
XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this date, the Court considered the Government's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (docket no. 28), Plaintiffs' response (docket no. 44), the Government's reply (docket no. 45), Plaintiffs' sur-reply (docket no. 51), and the Government's sur-sur-reply (docket no. 52). After careful consideration, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the Government's motion.
Montel v. City of Springfieldpublic domain
WILLIAM G. YOUNG, DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Nicholas Montel ("Montel") brought the instant suit against the City of Springfield ("Springfield") and three Springfield police officers, William Catellier, Luke Cournoyer, and Juan Rodriguez (the "Officers"), alleging violations of his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights and various torts. See generally Compl., ECF No. 1. These
OPINION YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice Appellant Pay and Save, Inc., doing business as Big 8 Food Stores (Big 8), appeals a jury’s finding that its negligence proximately caused the injury of Appellee Cosme Raul Martinez, and its award to Martinez of $8,000 as mental anguish damages. We reverse the award of past mental anguish damages, render a