⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Rodriguez v. Muhammad”

Muhammad v. Uleppublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014-08-22 · Published · cited 0× · 581 F. App'x 315
PER CURIAM: Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. Ulep, No. 1:14-cv-00055-LO-IDD (E.D.Va. filed Apr. 10, 2014; entered Apr. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015-07-23 · Published · cited 90× · 794 F.3d 1288; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12724; 2015 WL 4480919
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns the challenging twenty-nine day trial of Hafiz Muhammad *1292 Sher Ali Khan. A federal grand jury indicted Khan in 2011 on terrorism-related charges. At trial, the Government presented evidence demonstrating Khan’s involvement in the transfer of money
People v. Muhammadpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023-12-22 · Published · cited 4× · 2023 IL App (1st) 220372
2023 IL App (1st) 220372 No. 1-22-0372 Opinion filed December 22, 2023 SIXTH DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT _______
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-10-08 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ZAYN AL ABIDIN MUHAMMAD HUSAYN (ISN # 10016), Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 08-1360 (EGS) LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. Introduction Petitioner Zayn al Abidi
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2006-08-09 · Published · cited 137× · 912 A.2d 88; 189 N.J. 1; 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1154
Justice RIVERA-SOTO, concurring in part and dissenting in part. To the extent the majority holds that the arbitration agreements in this case are enforceable, ante, 189 N.J. at 26, 912 A.2d at 103 (2006), I concur. However, to the extent the majority holds that the class-arbitration waivers in plaintiffs arbitration agreements are unconscionable, ante, 18
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2022-06-21 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § IN RE: No. 08-22-00033-CR § BILAL MUHAMMAD, AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING §
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2022-02-09 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § IN RE No. 08-21-00123-CR § BILAL MUHAMMAD, § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING §
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-10-23 · Published · cited 24× · 241 A.3d 1149; 2020 Pa. Super. 256
J-A16020-20 2020 PA Super 256 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. TANISHA MUHAMMAD Appellant No. 1455 MDA 2018 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered July 20, 2018 In the Court of Common Pleas of Berks C
People v. Muhammadpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-04-04 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 2609
People v Muhammad (2019 NY Slip Op 02609) People v Muhammad 2019 NY Slip Op 02609 Decided on April 4, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-10-23 · Published · cited 1× · 2020 Pa. Super. 256
J-A16020-20 2020 PA Super 256 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. TANISHA MUHAMMAD Appellant No. 1455 MDA 2018 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered July 20, 2018 In the Court of Common Pleas of Berk
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2021-08-17 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-21-00123-CR IN RE: BILAL MUHAMMAD, § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING Relator. §
Muhammad v. Garrettpublic domain
District Court, E.D. California · 2014-12-11 · Published · cited 5× · 66 F. Supp. 3d 1287; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171744; 2014 WL 7004752
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JENNIFER L. THURSTON, United States Magistrate Judge. In this action, Plaintiff claims he suffered excessive force during an arrest. In the current motion, Defendants argue they are entitled to a grant of summary judgment because Plaintiffs entire complaint is barred. (Doc. 95) The evidence demonstrates that Plaintiff has suffered convictions of cr
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2018-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § BILAL MUHAMMAD, No. 08-18-00125-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the § v.
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2018-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § BILAL MUHAMMAD, No. 08-18-00125-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the §
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2023-03-27 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-23-00069-CR EX PARTE: § Appeal from the BILAL MUHAMMAD, § 168th Judicial District Court Appellant. §
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2023-03-27 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-23-00069-CR EX PARTE: § Appeal from the BILAL MUHAMMAD, § 168th Judicial District Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2021-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § BILAL MUHAMMAD, No. 08-21-00134-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2023-11-02 · Published · cited 0×
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed November 2, 2023 In the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00965-CR Ex Parte ZOHAIB MUHAMMAD IMRAN On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. WX22-90074-Q MEMORANDUM OPI
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2021-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § BILAL MUHAMMAD, No. 08-21-00134-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the § v.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-01-24 · Published · cited 43× · 880 F.3d 958
SMITH, Chief Judge. A jury convicted Muhammad Anwar of : (1) conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and controlled substance analogues, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 841(b)(1)(c), and 846, and (2) conspiracy to commit money la