Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Rodriguez v. Muhammad”
Muhammad v. Uleppublic domain
PER CURIAM: Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. Ulep, No. 1:14-cv-00055-LO-IDD (E.D.Va. filed Apr. 10, 2014; entered Apr. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
United States v. Hafiz Muhammad Sher Ali Khanpublic domain
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns the challenging twenty-nine day trial of Hafiz Muhammad *1292 Sher Ali Khan. A federal grand jury indicted Khan in 2011 on terrorism-related charges. At trial, the Government presented evidence demonstrating Khan’s involvement in the transfer of money
People v. Muhammadpublic domain
2023 IL App (1st) 220372 No. 1-22-0372 Opinion filed December 22, 2023 SIXTH DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT _______
Muhammad Husayn v. Gatespublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ZAYN AL ABIDIN MUHAMMAD HUSAYN (ISN # 10016), Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 08-1360 (EGS) LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. Introduction Petitioner Zayn al Abidi
Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, Delawarepublic domain
Justice RIVERA-SOTO, concurring in part and dissenting in part. To the extent the majority holds that the arbitration agreements in this case are enforceable, ante, 189 N.J. at 26, 912 A.2d at 103 (2006), I concur. However, to the extent the majority holds that the class-arbitration waivers in plaintiffs arbitration agreements are unconscionable, ante, 18
in Re: Bilal Muhammadpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § IN RE: No. 08-22-00033-CR § BILAL MUHAMMAD, AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING §
in Re: Bilal Muhammadpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § IN RE No. 08-21-00123-CR § BILAL MUHAMMAD, § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING §
Com. v. Muhammad, T.public domain
J-A16020-20 2020 PA Super 256 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. TANISHA MUHAMMAD Appellant No. 1455 MDA 2018 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered July 20, 2018 In the Court of Common Pleas of Berks C
People v. Muhammadpublic domain
People v Muhammad (2019 NY Slip Op 02609) People v Muhammad 2019 NY Slip Op 02609 Decided on April 4, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Com. v. Muhammad, T.public domain
J-A16020-20 2020 PA Super 256 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. TANISHA MUHAMMAD Appellant No. 1455 MDA 2018 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered July 20, 2018 In the Court of Common Pleas of Berk
in Re: Bilal Muhammadpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-21-00123-CR IN RE: BILAL MUHAMMAD, § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING Relator. §
Muhammad v. Garrettpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JENNIFER L. THURSTON, United States Magistrate Judge. In this action, Plaintiff claims he suffered excessive force during an arrest. In the current motion, Defendants argue they are entitled to a grant of summary judgment because Plaintiffs entire complaint is barred. (Doc. 95) The evidence demonstrates that Plaintiff has suffered convictions of cr
Bilal Muhammad v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § BILAL MUHAMMAD, No. 08-18-00125-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the § v.
Bilal Muhammad v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § BILAL MUHAMMAD, No. 08-18-00125-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the §
Bilal Muhammad v. the State of Texaspublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-23-00069-CR EX PARTE: § Appeal from the BILAL MUHAMMAD, § 168th Judicial District Court Appellant. §
Bilal Muhammad v. the State of Texaspublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-23-00069-CR EX PARTE: § Appeal from the BILAL MUHAMMAD, § 168th Judicial District Court
Bilal Muhammad v. the State of Texaspublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § BILAL MUHAMMAD, No. 08-21-00134-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the
Zohaib Muhammad Imran v. the State of Texaspublic domain
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed November 2, 2023 In the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00965-CR Ex Parte ZOHAIB MUHAMMAD IMRAN On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. WX22-90074-Q MEMORANDUM OPI
Bilal Muhammad v. the State of Texaspublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § BILAL MUHAMMAD, No. 08-21-00134-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the § v.
United States v. Muhammad Anwarpublic domain
SMITH, Chief Judge. A jury convicted Muhammad Anwar of : (1) conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and controlled substance analogues, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 841(b)(1)(c), and 846, and (2) conspiracy to commit money la