Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Rodriguez v. Pacific Steel Casting Company”
SMITH, Circuit Judge, When Congress expressly delegates rulemaking authority in a regulatory sphere to one agency, and that delegation is declared unconstitutional, may a different agency provide regulatory guidance in the same sphere on its own initiative? The Surface Transportation Board (“Board”) said yes—and on that basis it promulgated a rule defining “on-time performance” under the Passenger Rail Investment and Improveme
Pena v. Taylor Farms Pacific, Inc.public domain
ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. The plaintiffs, hourly workers, move for class certification against their current and former employers. Pis.’ Mot. Class Cert., ECF No. 56.1 Three defendants, Taylor Farms Pacific, Inc. (TFP), Abel Mendoza, Inc. (AMI), and SlingShot Connections, LLC (SlingShot), oppose their motion. Def. TFP’s Opp’n Class Cert. (TFP Opp’n), E
United Steel Workers v. NLRBpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA AFL-CIO-CLC, Petitioner, No. 04-76132 v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS N.L.R.B. No. 31-CA-26120 BOARD, Respondent, OPINION TOWER INDUSTRIES, INC.,
Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.public domain
12 Cal.3d 382 (1974) 525 P.2d 669 115 Cal. Rptr. 765 MARY ANNE RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. L.A. 30271. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. August 21, 1974. *385 COUNSEL Ned Good for Plaint
Nada Pacific Corp. v. Power Eng'g & Mfg., Ltd.public domain
*1209ORDER GRANTING BESSER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Re: ECF No. 71] LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION In this action, several entities sued each other after a mierotunnel boring machine broke down while it was boring an underground tunnel on a construction project for the San F
*161KISTLER, J. The Oregon Medical Marijuana Act authorizes persons holding a registry identification card to use marijuana for medical purposes. ORS 475.306(1). It also exempts those persons from state criminal liability for manufacturing, delivering, and possessing marijuana, provided that certain conditions are met. ORS 475.309(1). The Federal Controlled Substances A
American Zurich Insurance Company v. Daniel Samudiopublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-15-00478-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/18
ACCEPTED 13-15-00167-CV FILED THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS
ACCEPTED 03-14-00667-CV 3957344 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT WEIS, Circuit Judge. This appeal is from the grant of injunctive relief and liability findings in a wide-ranging employment discrimination class action. We conclude that: (1) the same period of limitations applies in § 1981 claims as in those under § 1983; (2) class representatives who were not discriminated against in initial work assignments may not represent those who were; (3) on re
United Steel Workers of America Afl-Cio-Clc v. National Labor Relations Board, Tower Industries, Inc., Intervenorpublic domain
GRABER, Circuit Judge. Petitioner United Steelworkers of Amer-ica (“the Union”) alleged unfair labor practices by Intervenor Tower Industries, Inc. An administrative law judge (“ALJ”) found that Tower had violated 29 U.S.C. § 158 and recommended several specific affirmative remedies, including an order requiring Tower to recognize and bargain with the Union, commonly known as
Rodriguez v. Taylorpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge. This appeal raises diverse issues resulting from a district court award of back pay, liquidated damages and attorneys’ fees to a plaintiff who successfully proved that the City of Philadelphia violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1970 & Supp. IV 1974) (ADEA). We affirm in part and reverse in part the district
Select Building Systems, Inc. and Tri-Bar Ranch Company, Ltd. v. Robertson Electric, Inc.public domain
FILED IN NO. 13-212 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/11/15 11:24:40 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk TAMI L. WOLE'F, C.S.R. PHONE: (830) 331-8286 NO. 13-212 ROBERTSON ELECTRIC, INC. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) VS . ) 216TH JUD
Adams v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.public domain
Opinion FRIEDMAN, J. On April 28, 1973, a trainload of military bombs carried by a Southern Pacific freight train detonated in the railroad’s freight yards at Roseville. A series of violent explosions occurred, causing damage throughout the neighborhood. Twenty-four plaintiffs *39filed this damage action against Southern Pacific Transportation Company, th
Rodriguez v. East Texas Motor Freightpublic domain
WISDOM, Circuit Judge: In this employment discrimination case the plaintiffs-appellants attack two ubiquitous practices in the trucking industry: (1) the trucking companies’ requirement that “city drivers” resign from their city driver jobs before applying for the more lucrative and sought-after “road” or “line driver” * positions, and (2) the companies’ rule preventing city drivers from carrying
ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL
750 F.2d 1183 1984-2 Trade Cases 66,310, 17 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 349 The UNITED STATESv.FISCHBACH AND MOORE, INC., the Howard P. Foley Company, LordElectric Company, Inc., Sargent Electric Company, E.C.Ernst, Inc., Tri-City Electric Company, Inc., Joseph J.Rodgers, Paul E. Arbogast, Frederic B. Sargent, Ralph D.Vryenhoek, James L. Oesterle.Appeal of SARGENT ELECTRIC COMPANY.The UNITED ST
James v. STOCKHAM VALVES AND FITTINGS COMPANYpublic domain
394 F.Supp. 434 (1975) Patrick JAMES et al., Plaintiffs, v. STOCKHAM VALVES AND FITTINGS COMPANY, a corporation, and Local No. 3036, United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 70-G-178-S. United States District Court, N. D. Alabama, S. D. March 19, 1975. *435 *436
United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.public domain
Mr. Justice Frankfurter, dissenting: The Founders divided our government into three branches, partly to prevent autocratic concentration of power and partly to achieve appropriate division of labor in the difficult task of government. The President has his duties, the Congress its duties, and we ours. What powers the Congress should give the President in order to obtain the most effective production of war suppl
Southwest Airlines Company v. Texas International Airlines, Inc. v. Texas Aeronautics Commission, Intervenor-Appelleepublic domain
WISDOM, Circuit Judge: Southwest Airlines Co. has returned to the federal courts for the second time in *87 two years to preserve a 1973 judgment in a federal district court. The recurring litigation concerns Southwest’s right to continue its air passenger services at Love Field in Dallas, Texas, and