Cases

Carlton W. Reeves, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Mark Mayfield lived in Madison County, Mississippi. He and his wife, Robin, were proud parents of two sons, Owen and William. He practiced real estate law, was active in the Baptist Church, and was a founder of the Mississippi Tea Party. In 2014, Mayfield's activism led him to volunteer for a political campaign. He enthusiastically supported State Senator Chris McDani

[Cite as Moore v. Sandusky Bldg. Code Bd. of Appeals, 2024-Ohio-1799.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY Shameka L. Moore, Trustee Court of Appeals No. E-23-042 Appellant Trial Court No. 2022 CV 0116 v. City of Sandusky Building DECISION AND JUDG

Lisa S. Van Amburg, Chief Judge INTRODUCTION Miken Technologies, Inc. (“Miken”) appeals the judgment of the trial court in *725 favor of AB Realty One, LLC (“AB Realty”) on AB Realty’s petition for breach of a lease agreement. Miken argues the trial court misapplied the law

963 P.2d 56 (1998) 154 Or. App. 522 Vicki SELLER, M.D., Respondent, v. SALEM WOMENS CLINIC, INC., and Elizabeth Harmon, M.D., Appellants. 94C14042; CA A93610. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted October 23, 1997. Decided June 24, 1998. Clayton Patrick, Salem, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the openi

247 P.3d 371 (2011) 2011 UT 04 TOOELE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff, Appellee, and Cross-appellant, v. TOOELE CITY CORPORATION, Defendant, Appellant, and Cross-appellee. No. 20090028. Supreme Court of Utah. January 11, 2011. *373 Paxton R. Guymon, Joel T. Zenger, Salt Lake City, for appellee.</

OPINION D. MICHAEL SWINEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., and JOHN W. McCLARTY, J.J., joined. The City of Newport (“Newport”) sought to annex certain properties in Cocke County. A number of affected parties (“the Plaintiffs”) objected to the annexation and filed

948 P.2d 356 (1997) F.C. STANGL, III, an individual dba F.C. Stangl Construction Company, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ERNST HOME CENTER, INC., a Washington corporation, Defendant and Appellant. No. 950187-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. October 30, 1997. Julianne P. Blanch, Salt Lake City, and Roger J. Kindley, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-1638 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v.

OPINION AND ORDER AIKEN, Chief Judge: Defendants Jane O’Keeffe, Ed Armstrong, Morgan Rider, Colleen Johnson, Melinda Eden, Dick Pederson, Joni Hammond, Wendy Wiles, David Collier, Jeffrey Stocum, Cory-Ann Wind, Lydia Emer, Leah Feldon, Greg Aldrich, Sue Langton, Ellen Rosenblum, and Kate Brown move to dismiss plaintiffs American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, American Trucking Associations, Inc., a

NAHMIAS, Justice. Appellants Larry Savage, Richard Pellegrino, and Tucker Hob-good challenge the trial court’s validation of revenue bonds that will be used to help finance a new stadium in Cobb County for the Atlanta Braves major league baseball team. The bonds for the stadium project are to be issued pursuant to an intergovernmental agreement between Cobb County and the Cobb-M

CRIST, Judge. Esdress Barnes, Jr. (Employee) appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Union Pacific Railroad Company (Employer) in Employee’s suit to recover for occupational hearing loss under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA). We reverse and remand. Employer hired Employee as a machine operator in 1981. As a machine operator, Employee was required to operate various equipmen

DOUCET, Judge. This is an appeal from a directed verdict dismissing the plaintiffs’ claims for damages allegedly arising from improper ad*246ministration of pertussis vaccine to a seven-year-old child. In 1985, Joan Toon received notice from the Calcasieu Parish School Board that her son, David Toon, had to have a Diptheria-Tetanus-Pertussis (DTP) b

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 17, 2014 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. THOMAS FANCHER GREENWOOD Appeal from the Circuit Court for Coffee County No. 37,894F L. Craig Johnson, Judge No. M2013-01924-CCA-R3-CD - Filed November 21, 2014 Appellant, Thomas Fancher Greenwood, was found guilty of felony murder during the perpetration

618 N.W.2d 275 (2000) Duane SKOW and Vinette Skow, Appellants, and Arnold Larsen and Paul Novak, Plaintiffs, v. Cecil Dean GOFORTH and Joyce Goforth, Appellees. No. 98-1570. Supreme Court of Iowa. October 11, 2000. *276 Robert A. Nading II of the Nading Law Firm, Ankeny, for appellants. Roger J. Hudson, Sr. and Andrew

672 N.W.2d 829 (2003) CITY OF MARQUETTE, Iowa, Appellee, v. Steven A. GAEDE and Ruth Gaede, Appellants. No. 02-1008. Supreme Court of Iowa. December 17, 2003. *831 Dale L. Putnam of Putnam Law Office, Decorah, for appellants. James A. Garrett of Jacobson, Bristol, Garrett & Swartz, Waukon, for appellee. CARTER,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-74 Filed: 21 November 2017 Forsyth County, Nos. 10-CVS-6926; 11-CVS-2998, 7119, 7120, 8170-8174, 8338; 12- CVS-4851, 4853-4859, 4861-4870, 4873-4876, 4916, 5953-5961, 5963, 6321, 6322, 6652, 7721, 8189; 13-CVS-1645, 4506, 6794, 7129; 14-CVS-4803-4806, 4808, 4809, 5702, 5703, 6311; 15-CVS-0301, 0610, 2471-2532, 3208-3231, 4011-4016, 4655-4657, 5447, 5448, 6744, 7770-777

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. The State of Missouri appeals the district court’s 1 order granting Russell Hadley’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We affirm. I. In the early morning hours of December 11, 1985, Hazel Smith, an elderly resid

19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY

Williams, Sp. J. This case was before this court on a former occasion, and the judgment rendered therein by the circuit court of Jefferson county was reversed, and the cause was remanded. On the filing of the mandate of the supreme court the cause was regularly tried by a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of appellee, upon which judgment was rendered. Erom this judgment defendants below have appealed

ORDER CARLTON W. REEVES, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the plaintiffs motion to remand. Docket No. 19. The defendants have responded in opposition, Docket No. 25, the plaintiff has replied, Docket No. 29, and the Court is ready to rule. The motion to remand will be granted.' Also pending is the defendants’ motion to strike portions of the plaintiffs reply brief. Docket No. 30. That m