Cases

OPINION GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge. Terry Clifton’s habeas corpus petition was denied because he failed to file his appeal in the Davidson County Chancery Court within the sixty-day period allowed for filing such appeals. Clifton attempted to file during that timeframe, but the clerk returned it unfiled because of unpaid court costs from a pre

SMITH, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in the court’s opinion except the portion that holds, as a matter of law, that the officers did not use excessive force to arrest Carpenter. Supra Part II.C. Five officers entered Carpenter’s home after being advised that Carpenter may have had a stroke. Carpenter was agitated and moving back a

' CARLTON, J., dissenting: ¶ 55. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion. Rather than reversing and remanding for further proceedings, I would instead affirm the circuit court’s judgment. ¶ 56. In turning to briefly review the pertinent facts, the record reflects that Carpenter sustained injuries as a result of falling on the pavement in front of the Jackson County Welcome Center. O

[Cite as Carpenter v. Carpenter, 2023-Ohio-274.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT BELMONT COUNTY MARY LOU CARPENTER, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JERRY N. CARPENTER, DECEASED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROGER D. CARPENTER, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE CARPENTER

JUSTICE O’HARA FROSSARD delivered the opinion of the court: This matter appears before this court on interlocutory appeal to consider a question certified by the circuit court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (155 Ill. 2d R. 308). Plaintiffs, Timothy J. Carpenter, Mervin G. Schaefer, James

[Cite as Carpenter v. Carpenter, 2023-Ohio-1496.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT BELMONT COUNTY MARY LOU CARPENTER, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JERRY N. CARPENTER, DECEASED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROGER D. CARPENTER, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE CARPENTE

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Judge. This Memorandum and Order relates to two direct actions by plaintiffs who have opted out of the class certified in the main action in this multi-district antitrust case, as noted in the caption above. The direct actions are presently before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss the European plaintiffs’ claims based on European law (Do

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 United States v. Nos. 01-5368/5370/5446 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2004 FED App. 0072P (6th Cir.) Carpenter, et al. File Name: 04a0072p.06 _________________ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS COUNSEL FOR THE SI

PER CURIAM. Appellant’s sentencing guidelines score-sheet erroneously scores victim injury as severe, when in fact the trial court ruled that the injuries were moderate. The State conceded the error in its brief, which the appellant called to our attention by filing a motion to expedite review based on the concession of *1184error. We commend the filing of the moti

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS. STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: JoAnn Carpenter alleges that her employer, Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) discriminated against her on account of her sex in promoting a male colleague rather than herself, and thus violated the District of Columbia Human Rights Act, D.C.Code §§ 1-2512 et seq. The District C

[Cite as State v. Carpenter, 2023-Ohio-2523.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO CLINTON COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2022-02-005 : OPINION - vs -

OPINION Jeffrey S. Bivins, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Cornelia A. Clark, Sharon G. Lee, Holly Kirby and Roger A. Page, JJ., joined. The Plaintiffs, each convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to death, 1 brought

849 F.Supp. 326 (1994) TCI OF ILLINOIS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Dan CARPENTER, individually etc., Defendant. No. 93 C 4694. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 8, 1994. Stuart D. Gordon of Zukowski, Rogers, Flood & McArdle, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff. Mark W. Rigazio of Rigazio & Bertani, Morris, IL, for defendant.

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Petitioner James Pavatt was convicted by an Oklahoma jury of first degree murder and conspiracy to commit first degree murder. Pavatt was sentenced to death for the first degree murder conviction and ten years' imprisonment for the conspiracy conviction. After exhausting his state court remedies, Pavatt filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

OPINION REILLY, Judge Appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion by denying appellant’s post-verdict motion for a judgment of acquittal following a court trial. Because we conclude that the district court abused its discretion by reading Minnesota Rule of Criminal Procedure 26.03, subdivision 18, section 3, in isolation, we reverse the decision of the district court that denied appellant

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Rose M. Carpenter (Carpenter) sued the Wichita Falls Independent School District (the School District) simultaneously in state and federal courts, complaining in the federal forum of a First Amendment violation, in the state forum of a breach of contract and a violation of her right to free speech under the Texas constitution. Asserting

05/14/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 25, 2023 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROGER EARL ENGLAND Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 117643 Kyle A. Hixson, Judge ___________________________________

In the Matter of Winifred Carpenter, et al. No. 2002, Sept. Term. 2023 Opinion by Leahy, J. Summary Judgment > Affidavit In order to defeat a motion for summary judgment, the opposing party must provide “factual assertions, under oath, based on the personal knowledge of the one swearing out an affidavit, giving a deposition, or answering interrogatories.” Miller v. Ratner, 114 Md. App. 18, 27 (1997) (emphasis in original). Summary Judgment > Affidavit Affidavits submitted in response to a mo

Opinion filed August 9, 2018 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-15-00323-CR __________ CARROLL CARPENTER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 161st District Court Ector Count

Rails-to-Trails; Fifth Amendment Takings; Arkansas Law; Property Interest Conveyed; Easements versus Fees; Multi-factor Test; Partial Summary Judgment OPINION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT FIRESTONE, Senior Judge. Pending before the court in the above-captioned rails-to-trails case are cross-motions for partial summar