Cases

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 07/28/2017 09:10 AM CDT - 565 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 296 Nebraska R eports IN RE ROBERT L. McDOWELL REVOCABLE TRUST Cite as 296 Neb. 565 In re Robert L. McDowell R e

350 S.W.3d 813 (2011) Melbourne MILLS, Jr; Bertha Darlene La; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.; and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellants, v. Mildred ABBOTT; Lisa Abraham; Juanita Alton; Joann Alvey; Cindy Armstrong; Linda Back; Carla Baldwin; Lee Bartley, Jr; Patricia Belcher; Leisa Belding: Eleanor Berry; Margie Berry; Carol Boggs; Angie Bowman; James Branham; Kathy Branham; Norma Brewer; Karen Brown; Deborah Browning; Nathaniel Brumfield, on behalf

PER CURIAM: The Covelo Indian Community (the “Community”), a federally recognized Indian Tribe, and California Trout, Inc. (“Cal Trout”), a private fishing organization, seek review of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“FERC”) decision to relicense a private utility’s hydroelectric project in Northern California. FERC has moved to dismiss the petitions for lack of appellate jurisdiction, contending that (1) the Com

314 F.3d 1304 John H. BANKS, Mary E. Banks, Robert Cunat, June M. Cunat, Ehret Michigan Trust, Greenbriar Development, George J. Gregule, Jr., Robert J. Kane, Patricia A. Kane, Frank F. Lahr, Charlotte D. Lahr, Notre Dame Path Association, Thelma McKay Trust, Robert F. Pancoast, Pamela S. Pancoast, Dorothy A. Renner, Yolanda P. Stevens, Marcia A. Wineberg, Richard Neuser, Donald R. Chapman, Gail L. Chapman, Frank J. Bunker, MD, L. Richard Marzke, N

LINN, Circuit Judge. John H. and Mary E. Banks, along with thirty-five other plaintiffs, seek review of final decisions of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing their individual complaints as barred by the statute of hmitations. See Banks et al. v. United States, 49 Fed.Cl. 806 (2001). Because the plaintiffs’ claims did not accrue more than six years before their filings, this court

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I

[Cite as Albers v. Lyon, 2026-Ohio-209.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO JAMES ALBERS, : APPEAL NO. C-250017 TRIAL NO. A-1903421 FRIEDA AARON, : PATRICIA ADAMS, : JUDGMENT ENTRY MICHELLE AGEE,

895 F.2d 581 The COVELO INDIAN COMMUNITY, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent.CALIFORNIA TROUT, INC., Petitioner,v.FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Mendocino County,California; County of Sonoma; Sonoma CountyWater Agency, Respondents-Intervenors. Nos. 87-7116, 87-7118. United States Court

Opinion of the Court by Justice VENTERS. This case arose in the aftermath of the settlement of Darla S. Guard, et' ál. v. American Home Products, Inc. (Guard).1 The Guard case, which is also known as “Jonetta Moore, et al. v. American Home Products, Inc.,” or the “Moore ” case, was brought by Kentucky residents who had taken th

333 B.R. 315 (2005) In re PRESTON TRUCKING CO., INC., Debtor. Preston Trucking Co., Inc., Plaintiff, v. Liquidity Solutions, Inc., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 99-5-9994-JS. Adversary No. 01-5293-JS. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland. April 8, 2005. *319 Stephen E. Leach, Tucker, Flyer, et al., Washington, DC,

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident *35and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration state

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Employees of Conagra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC, (ConAgra) appeal the dismissal of their claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. , and the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act, Ark. Code § 11-4-201, et seq. , arguing that factual disputes preclude summary j