Cases

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 19-5176 September Term, 2019 1:19-cv-00969-TNM Filed On: March 13, 2020 United States House of Representatives, Appellant v. Steven T. Mnuchin

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 28, 2020 Decided August 7, 2020 No. 19-5176 UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, APPELLANT v. STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, ET AL., APPELLEES On Rehearing

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 1, 2019 Decided August 20, 2019 No. 18-1085 CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES AGAINST TOXICS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW WHEELER, ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS AIR PERMITTING FORUM, ET AL

ORDER Per Curiam Upon consideration of the motions for summary affirmance, the opposition thereto, and the replies; and the motion for summary reversal, the oppositions thereto, and the replies, it is ORDERED that the motion for summary reversal be denied and the motions for summary affirmance be granted. The merits of the parties’ positions are so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpa

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILKINS. In Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission , this Court affirmed FERC's denial of refunds in a cost-allocation case, upholding its discretion to deny refunds where a flaw in rate design caused the costs to be borne disproportionately among customers. See

OPINION ON REHEARING ROBB, Chief Judge. Both D.L. (the “Family”) and the Department of Child Services (“DCS”) have petitioned for rehearing in our decision dated October 17, 2012. In our opinion, we held that DCS and its workers were not entitled to quasi-judicial immunity for their removal of a child from the home of relatives in whose care she had been placed and who were in the process of adopting her.

Rogers, Circuit Judge: *1031 On October 22, 2016, AT&T Inc. announced a proposed merger with Time Warner Inc. The government sued to enjoin this vertical merger under Section 7 of the Clayton Act,

Opinion for the court filed Per Curiam. Per Curiam: *1053 This appeal presents the question whether the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") had authority under Sections 307(d)(7)(B) and 112(r)(7) of the Clean Air Act ("CAA"),

FAY, Circuit Judge: Christine C. Peterson and Roger V. Peterson 1 appeal the decision of the United States Tax Court, determining deferred compensation payments under corporate plans made after Peterson’s retirement from Mary Kay, Inc. (“Mary Kay”), in tax year 2009 were derived from her former Mary Kay association, making them subject to self-employment tax. We affirm in part and dismiss in part.<

OPINION ROBB, Chief Judge. Case Summary and Issues D.L., Glen Black, Ann Black, Steven Lucas, and K.L. (collectively, the “Family”) appeal the trial court’s dismissal of seven out of eight counts of their complaint against the Tippecanoe County Department of Child Services and five of its employees (collectively, “DCS”). The Family raises two restated issues on ap

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT STEVEN R. WICKER’S MOTION, VACATING SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER AS TO STEVEN R. WICKER ONLY AND REMANDING REMAINING CAUSES OF ACTION, DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS HELEN E. BURRIS, Bankruptcy Judge. On appeal, the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina granted appellant Steven R. Wicker’s Motion to Remand and denied appellee SCBT, N.A.’s (“SCBT”) M

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES C. TURK, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Defendant J. Davis Architects, PLLC’s (“J. Davis”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. ECF No. 51. Plaintiffs filed a response, ECF No. 53, and Defendants filed a Reply, ECF No. 56. The Court heard argument on the motion on January 15, 2013, and the matter is now ripe for decision. The sole issue rai

HAZOURI, J. The trial court granted the Appellees’ (Gary D. Carroll and April Carroll) motion for summaiy judgment. On appeal, the Appellants, Palm Beach Pain Management and Anthony Rogers, contend that: (1) summary judgment was improper; and (2) the trial court erred when it denied a motion to disqualify the Carrolls’ attorney. We agree that the summary judgment was improper and reverse; however, we affirm point (2), as the

*758Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH, with whom Circuit Judges BROWN and GRIFFITH join. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge MILLETT. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge WILKINS. Joint Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judges ROGERS, TATEL,

¶ 1 In this appeal, we decide whether section 10-9-106 of the Utah Code precludes a municipality from charging school districts a monthly storm sewer drainage fee. The Jordan School District appeals from an order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of Sandy City on this issue. We affirm the district court's decision. FACTUAL BACKGROUND ¶ 2 In 1999, the Sandy City Council adopted Ordinance No. 99-16, establishing a storm se

BILLINGS, Chief Justice. Defendant Heath A. Wilkins pleaded guilty to first degree murder and was sentenced to death for the brutal and multiple stabbing killing of a 26-year-old mother of two small children during the course of a robbery of the victim’s convenience store. Affirmed. Defendant, proceeding pro se after dismissing and waiving appointed counsel, entered pleas of guilty to the murder charge, a

173 F.Supp.2d 601 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Patrick WILKINS, Plaintiffs, v. NORTH AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, CH & A Corporation, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. H-95-5614. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. November 27, 2001. *602 *603

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND AMENDED ORDER ROSENTHAL, District Judge. In 1995, relator Patrick Wilkins, a former chief operating officer of a subcontractor to a drilling contract with the Army Corps of Engineers, filed this suit under the qui tarn provisions of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3730. Wil*504kins filed suit under seal- so that the U

366 F.3d 369 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Shawn Arnette BREEDEN, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Kevin Thomas Cassell, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Michael Anthony Carpenter, Defendant-Appellant. No. 03-22. No. 03-23. No. 03-24.

05/31/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 2, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARIO ROGERS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 19-05138, C1907166 Carolyn W. Blackett, Judge ____________