Cases

OPINION GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge. Terry Clifton’s habeas corpus petition was denied because he failed to file his appeal in the Davidson County Chancery Court within the sixty-day period allowed for filing such appeals. Clifton attempted to file during that timeframe, but the clerk returned it unfiled because of unpaid court costs from a pre

' CARLTON, J., dissenting: ¶ 55. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion. Rather than reversing and remanding for further proceedings, I would instead affirm the circuit court’s judgment. ¶ 56. In turning to briefly review the pertinent facts, the record reflects that Carpenter sustained injuries as a result of falling on the pavement in front of the Jackson County Welcome Center. O

[Cite as Carpenter v. Carpenter, 2023-Ohio-1496.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT BELMONT COUNTY MARY LOU CARPENTER, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JERRY N. CARPENTER, DECEASED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROGER D. CARPENTER, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE CARPENTE

961 A.2d 403 (2009) 290 Conn. 107 Richard T. CARPENTER, Jr. v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION. No. 18197. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued October 22, 2008. Decided January 13, 2009. *405 Temmy Ann Pieszak, chief of habeas corpus services, for the appellant (petitioner). Mitchell S.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Judge. This Memorandum and Order relates to two direct actions by plaintiffs who have opted out of the class certified in the main action in this multi-district antitrust case, as noted in the caption above. The direct actions are presently before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss the European plaintiffs’ claims based on European law (Do

SMITH, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in the court’s opinion except the portion that holds, as a matter of law, that the officers did not use excessive force to arrest Carpenter. Supra Part II.C. Five officers entered Carpenter’s home after being advised that Carpenter may have had a stroke. Carpenter was agitated and moving back a

[Cite as Carpenter v. Carpenter, 2023-Ohio-274.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT BELMONT COUNTY MARY LOU CARPENTER, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JERRY N. CARPENTER, DECEASED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROGER D. CARPENTER, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE CARPENTER

JUSTICE O’HARA FROSSARD delivered the opinion of the court: This matter appears before this court on interlocutory appeal to consider a question certified by the circuit court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (155 Ill. 2d R. 308). Plaintiffs, Timothy J. Carpenter, Mervin G. Schaefer, James

The bill herein was filed by a trustee in bankruptcy to reach assets of defendant Amos M. Carpenter, bankrupt, claimed to have been placed in the names of the bankrupt and his wife in fraud of creditors. Defendants appeared by attorneys and by joint answer denied the alleged fraud. Notice of hearing of the cause was given to defendants' attorneys and they notified the attorney for plaintiff that they had withdrawn from the case and had sent the papers in their hands to defendants. Notice of w

PER CURIAM. Appellant challenges an order denying his motion seeking post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse and remand *1256for further- consideration in light of the recent decision in Heggs v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S137, — So.2d —, 2000 WL 178052 (Fla. Feb. 17, 2000). REVERSED and

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 United States v. Nos. 01-5368/5370/5446 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2004 FED App. 0072P (6th Cir.) Carpenter, et al. File Name: 04a0072p.06 _________________ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS COUNSEL FOR THE SI

827 N.E.2d 78 (2005) Steven L. ROGERS, Appellant-Petitioner, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Respondent. No. 20A03-0409-PC-421. Court of Appeals of Indiana. May 11, 2005. Transfer Denied July 26, 2005. *79 Susan K. Carpenter, Public Defender of Indiana, Jeffrey R. Wright, Deputy Public Defender, Indianapolis, IN, A

[Cite as State v. Carpenter, 2023-Ohio-2523.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO CLINTON COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2022-02-005 : OPINION - vs -

MEMORANDUM ** American General Life Insurance Company, Inc., appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Roger N. Carpenter, Peter Charles Carpenter and Denise M. Carpenter1 (collectively “the Carpenters”). We reverse and remand. American General paid the proceeds of a life insurance policy to the decedent’s widow, Cristina Carpenter, the desig

PER CURIAM. Appellant’s sentencing guidelines score-sheet erroneously scores victim injury as severe, when in fact the trial court ruled that the injuries were moderate. The State conceded the error in its brief, which the appellant called to our attention by filing a motion to expedite review based on the concession of *1184error. We commend the filing of the moti

17 B.R. 319 (1982) In re ROGERS OIL COMPANY, Debtor. Jill JACOWAY, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Plaintiff, v. Mike CARPENTER, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. FA-81-16, Adv. No. 81-640. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division. January 28, 1982. *320 Jill R. Jacoway, Fayetteville, Ark., for plaintiff. Jo

18 P.3d 1034 (2001) Al ROGERS, an individual, and Penny Rogers, an individual, both d/b/a Big Al's Good Time Pizza and Stuff, a Sole Proprietorship; John Peshek, d/b/a Pip Printing, a Sole Proprietorship; Howard Zink, d/b/a Mr. Roy Productions, a Sole Proprietorship; Wesley Fletcher, d/b/a Fletcher Roofing & Siding, a Sole Proprietorship; Ronald Trombly, d/b/a Ron Trombly Construction, Inc., a Sole Proprietorship; Shelly Swanson, d/b/a Swanson and So

1 P.3d 228 (1999) H.G. WESTERMAN, Carl A. Westerman, and Loyle P. Miller, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. James P. ROGERS, Desmond D. Brophy, Joseph P. Brophy, Jr., Joseph P. Brophy, Douglas K. Brophy, James P. Brophy, James P. Brophy, III, Alice Snelling, Donald R. Brophy, and Martin D. Brophy, Defendants-Appellants. No. 98CA0400. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. V. August 5, 1999.

[Cite as State v. Rogers, 2024-Ohio-1637.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2023-08-063 : OPINION - vs -

584 N.W.2d 375 (1998) 230 Mich. App. 547 Larry CARPENTER and Vanessa Carpenter, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross Appellees, v. CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee/Cross Appellant. Kenneth CASE and Diana Case, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross Appellants, v. CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant/Cross Appellee. Larry CARPENTER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.</