Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Rogers v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc.”
Najolia v. Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc.public domain
ORDER AND REASONS CARL J. BARBIER, District Judge. Before the Court are Plaintiff Frank Najolia, Jr.’s Motion to Remand (Rec. Doc. 21) and oppositions to same filed by Defendant General Electric Company (Rec. Doc. 40) and Defendant CBS Corporation (Rec. Doe. 41). The motion is set for hearing on May 23, 2012, on supporting memoranda and without oral argument. Having considered the motion and legal memoranda,
Rome v. ASBESTOSpublic domain
70 So.3d 121 (2011) Elodie Granier ROME and Donald Francis Rome v. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS; Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc., (formerly Avondale Industries, Inc., and formerly Avondale Shipyards, Inc.) and its Executive Officers, et al. No. 2010-CA-1645. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. June 16, 2011. *122 Gerolyn P.
National Horsemen's Benevolent v. Blackpublic domain
Case: 22-10387 Document: 00516550467 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/18/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED Novembe
Hortman-Salmen Co. v. Whitepublic domain
The Hortman-Salmen Company, plaintiff and appellee, as mortgage creditor, foreclosed, under executory process, on certain property owned by Walter William White, the mortgagor. After the sale, the civil sheriff took a rule against all parties having privileges recorded against the property to show cause why the inscriptions should not be canceled and the proceeds of sale distributed to those entitled thereto. The appellants, furnishers of material, appeared, and, in answer to th
Zahn v. General Insurance Co. of Americapublic domain
611 P.2d 645 (1980) F. Anthony ZAHN and Gwendolyn R. Zahn, Husband and Wife, and Landco, Inc., a corporation, Appellants, v. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, an Insurance Corporation, and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, an Insurance Corporation, Appellees. No. 52465. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. May 20, 1980. Fellers, Snider, Blankenship, Bailey &
OSCN Found Document:IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Research Calendar
Ghisalberti v. Lagardepublic domain
Plaintiffs are the owners of an apartment building in this city. Defendant, for seven years, was lessee of the building. Plaintiffs seek to recover from defendant $2,475.13, charging that they necessarily expended that sum of money in repairing damage alleged to have been sustained by the building during the term of the lease. Plaintiffs admit owing to defendant $426.74 as their pro rata of insurance premiums paid by defendant and still in existence at the termination of the lease, and