Cases

FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ALL CASES GONZALEZ, District Judge. THESE SIXTY CASES have come before the undersigned pursuant to Administrative Order 91-38, entered on May 10, 1991 by the Hon. James Lawrence King, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The cases were consolidated for the limited purpose of ruling on the defendants’ petition for removal.

Applying this holding to the case before it, the supreme court concludes that the challenged evidence is an extrinsic act that implicates the defendant’s character, and its admissibility is therefore governed by CRE 404(b) and Spoto. But because the trial court admitted the evidence under the doctrine of res gestae, it didn’t conduct a CRE 404(b) analysis and didn’t provide the requisite procedural safeguards. This constituted error. And because the error was not harmless, the judgm

2022 CO 8 Brooke E. Rojas, Petitioner

In a trial by the court, after proper waiver of jury, defendants Rojas and Hidalgo were found guilty of a charge of receiving stolen property. Defendants' motions for new trial were denied. Rojas was granted probation without imposition of sentence and Hidalgo was sentenced to state prison. They appeal, respectively, from the order granting probation, the judgment, and the orders denying the motions for new trial. Defendants urge that they were guilty of no crime (or, at most,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MAO HIN, Defendant and Appellant. S141519 San Joaquin County Superior Court SF090168B February 3, 2025 Justice Liu authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Guerrero and Justic

Filed 4/23/25 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MAO HIN, Defendant and Appellant. S141519 San Joaquin County Superior Court SF090168B ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARIN

ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment solely on Plaintiffs discriminatory and retaliatory termination claim (Docs. 12, 13) and Defendant’s Reply (Doc. 17). While provided with the opportunity to do so, Plaintiff did not respond to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. I. Background

Opinion by Judge FURMAN. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. hese Co e Malle. 143 C A. C.G.'s Bruised EAP errr erk rak ke eee elk alg 143. B. The Welfare Check and Visit to the Center ................................ 144 C. C.G.'s Other Statements at School .............................. sek ke... 145 D. - Easter lle aleve ree rare n eee a kee ea eae ek

512 F.Supp.2d 1209 (2007) Alverene D. BUTLER, Plaintiff, v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, et al., Defendants. No. 2:06-CV-278-MEF. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. May 21, 2007. *1210 *1211 *1212

805 F.Supp.2d 1246 (2011) Claude R. SHORT, Plaintiff, v. MANDO AMERICAN CORPORATION, Defendant. Case No. 3:10-cv-350-MEF. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division. August 1, 2011. *1250 Alicia Kay Haynes, Haynes & Haynes, PC, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff. Kathryn Morris Willis, Marcel Louis Debruge

Opinion CORRIGAN, J. Defendant Ivan Joe Gonzales was convicted of murdering Genny Rojas. 1 The jury found as a special circumstance that the murder was intentional and involved the infliction of torture. 2 However, it was unable to reach a p

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Garib Bazaín, Jorge Recurrido Certiorari v. 2020 TSPR 69 Hospital Español Auxilio Mutuo de Puerto Rico, Inc.; 204 DPR _____ Sociedad Española de Auxilio Mutuo y Beneficencia de Puerto Rico, Inc.; Dr. José A. Isado Zardón y la Sociedad de Bienes Ganaciales compuesta con la Sra. Diana Vigil Vigil Peticionaria Número del

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge: The underworld exploits of John Gotti and the courtroom legerdemain of his attorney, Bruce Cutler, are now the stuff of legend. Cutler’s last appearance on Gotti’s behalf was in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (I. Leo Glas-ser, Judge). Notwithstanding the court’s pre-trial admonition and orders to

582 F.Supp. 65 (1984) Manuel Ramos APONTE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. 83-1286 (JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 31, 1984. *66 Alvaro R. Calderon, Calderon, Rosa-Silva & Vargas, Hato Rey, P.R., for plaintiff. Eduardo E. Toro-Font, Asst. U.S. Atty., Hato Rey, P.R

El Juez Asociado Señor Andréu García emitió la opinion del Tribunal. Esta opinión nos permite interpretar los requisitos dispuestos en el Art. 2 de la Ley sobre Pensiones por Incapacidad o Muerte en el Cumplimiento del Deber, Ley Núm. 127 de 27 de junio de 1958, según enmendada, 25 L.PR.A. see. 377, para que un miembro de la Policía que se incapacita en el ejercicio de sus funciones oficiales pueda ser acreedor a

Opinión concurrente y disidente del Juez Asociado Señor Negrón García. h-i Bajo el ideal de un sistema democrático de gobierno, plasmado en nuestra Constitución, el legislador puertorri-queño es heredero de una hermosa tradición histórica, ga-nada con el esfuerzo, el trabajo y la honestidad de genera-ciones de servidores públicos. Por tal r

El Juez Asociado Señor Santana Becerra emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Al terminar de declarar en su testimonio directo María Medina, un testigo ocular del accidente de automóvil por el cual se procesaba al apelante de homicidio involuntario, el récord demuestra: *877“Defensor (Ledo. Amadeo): Señor juez, antes de interrogar

El Juez Asociado Señor Ortiz emitió la opinión del tribunal. En el antiguo Tribunal de Distrito de Puerto Rico, Sec-ción de Aguadilla, radicó el fiscal una acusación por infrac-ción a la Ley 220 de 1948 (Ley de Bolita) contra Miguel! Acevedo Quiles, Santiago Vargas Rivera, Efraín Ríos Feli-ciano, Pablo Méndez Feliciano, Justino Acevedo Quiles, Justiniano Borrero Pérez, Alejandrino Acevedo Méndez, Ramón Soto Ver

El Juez Asociado Señor Wolf, emitió la opinión del tribunal. Francisco Rodríguez Hernández dió muerte a Laureano G-onzález Badillo, y se le acusó de asesinato en segundo grado, siendo convicto de homicidio voluntario. En la acu-sación se alegó y se demostró, según se admite, que Rodrí-guez no solamente hizo cinco disparos a González, sino tam-bién- que le infirió varias heridas de arma blanca. El acu-sado solic

Opinión del Juez Asociado Señor Hernández Matos expo-niendo los criterios en que funda su voto de no ha lugar a la moción de reconsideración, en la cual concurren el Juez Presidente Señor Negrón Fernández y el Juez Aso-ciado Señor Santana Becerra. San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 27 de junio de 1969 El peticionario solicitó la reconsideración de nuestra de