Cases

OPINION Rebeca Huddle, Justice Appellants Roland Mouton, Jr. and De-lorian Morgan Jones sued Christian Faith Missionary Baptist Church, its pastor, Corey Wilson, and. other church members, including Clarence Andrews, Marvin .Nixon, Walter Ervin, Marvin Rausaw, Preston Cook, and Christopher Douglas, after appellants were expelled from church membership and W

894 S.W.2d 298 (1994) STATE of Tennessee, Appellee, v. Roland HAYES, Appellant. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Jackson. October 5, 1994. Permission to Appeal Denied February 6, 1995. *299 William D. Massey, Memphis (at Trial and on Appeal), Joseph S. Ozment, Memphis (on Appeal), for appellant. Charles W. Burson

933 F.Supp. 1573 (1995) Mrs. E. Claire KNOX and Katherine Carroll as Administratrix of the estate of Lucinda Knox, Plaintiffs, v. Nathaniel HAYES, Roland's Bonded Warehouse, Inc., Providence Washington Insurance Co., and Continental Casualty Co., Defendants. Civil Action No. 494-147. United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division. April 24, 1995.

01/07/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 6, 2018 Session ROLAND DIGITAL MEDIA, INC. v. CITY OF LIVINGSTON Appeal from the Chancery Court for Overton County No. 17-CV-48 Ronald Thurman, Chancellor ___________________________________

SUSAN M. CHEHARDY, Chief Judge. I ¡.On appeal, defendant challenges his guilty pleas. For the following reasons, we affirm defendant’s convictions but remand for re-sentencing and correction of the commitment. Facts and Procedural History In this case, the convictions resulted from guilty pleas so the facts surrounding the offenses were gleaned from the bill of informati

JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge. JgNTRODUCTION In this, his second appeal, defendant/appellant, Calvin Hayes, seeks review of his sentences, claiming that they were illegally rendered. For the following reasons, we affirm defendant’s sentences and remand the matter for correction of the commitment. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On March 23, 2012, the Jefferson Par

EARL T. LINDSAY, JR. AND * NO. 2023-C-0155 JOCELYN BUTLER * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT PORTS AMERICA GULFPORT, INC., ET AL. * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPLICATION FOR WRITS DIRECTED TO CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO. 2016-01610, DIVISION “C”

PER CURIAM. The defendant, James Michael Hayes, was charged by separate bills of information with simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:62.2 and theft of an article having a value of over $1,000.00 in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:67. Pursuant to a plea bargain agree*872ment he entered pleas of guilty to attempted simple burglary of an inhabi

69 So.3d 1249 (2011) STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph HAYES. No. 2010-KA-1540. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. July 6, 2011. *1250 Leon A. Cannizzaro, Jr., District Attorney, Matthew C. Kirkham, Assistant District Attorney, New Orleans, LA, for State of Louisiana. Katherine M. Franks, Louisiana Appellate Project,

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: *1328 This appeal requires us to decide whether two municipal judges enjoy absolute judicial immunity and a mayor and two police chiefs enjoy qualified immunity from a complaint alleging claims of peonage and false imprisonment. Several residents of Montgom

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005 ROLAND BENNETT v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 230168 Buddy D. Perry, Judge No. E2004-01416-CCA-R3-PC - Filed July 14, 2005 The petitioner, Roland Bennett, is currently serving a life sentence imposed in

MILLIKEN, Chief Justice. The petitioner, imprisoned in Virginia, sought trial of an indictment against him in Kentucky and was denied relief. He now seeks to have the Kentucky indictment dismissed on the ground that the delay in affording him trial has caused him “to lose some of his possible defense * * but he does not specify in what manner he is so affected. The detainer against him which was iiled in Virginia by Kentucky

87 Wn.2d 280 (1976) 552 P.2d 1038 EDWARD W. HAYES, Respondent, v. GEORGE YOUNT, ET AL, Appellants. No. 43776. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. July 15, 1976. J. Grahame Bell, for appellant Yount. Slade Gorton, Attorney General, Charles B. Roe, Jr., Senior Assistant, and Robert V. Jensen and Charles W. L

—Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action after defendant Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. (Nationwide) denied their claim under their homeowner’s policy. The claim arose from the collapse of a “carriage” barn located on plaintiffs’ property and covered under the “other structures” portion of the policy. Supreme Court properly de

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 24, 2008 Session LISA FAYE ROLAND CAMP v. RANDY COLEMAN CAMP Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Crockett County No. 8752 Jon Kerry Blackwood, Sr. Judge sitting by Designation No. W2006-02644-COA-R3-CV - Filed February 28, 2008 This appeal arises from a divorce act

WENDY DEAN, WIFE OF/AND * NO. 2021-CA-0388 ROLAND DEAN, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON * BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR COURT OF APPEAL SON, ROLAND DEAN, III * FOURTH CIRCUIT VERSUS * STATE OF LOUISIANA DE LA SALLE OF NEW ******* ORLEANS, INC., D/B/A DE LA SALLE HIGH SCHOOL, RYAN MANALE, BRAD STEVE

SUCCESSION OF JOHN * NO. 2019-CA-0575 PHILLIP BARBEE, JR. * COURT OF APPEAL * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT

*486 [As amended by order of the Court of Appeals February 3, 2016.] Leach, J. ¶1 Courts apply the equitable doctrine of judicial estoppel to protect the integrity of the judicial process by precluding a party from gaining an advantage by asserting one position in a court proceeding

3 Md. App. 4 (1968) 237 A.2d 531 GARFIELD ARNOLD HAYES v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 308, Initial Term, 1967. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided January 24, 1968. The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ANDERSON, MORTON, ORTH, and THOMPSON, JJ. *6 Roland Walker, with whom was

Lee, J. This is an action of contract against two defendants, Roland D. Boulay, a builder, and Nathaniel Guy, the owner, for materials supplied and labor performed in the construction of a new home. There was a finding for the plaintiff against Boulay on 3 .counts in each instance in the sum of $590.88. Boulay did not appeal. There were findings for the plaintiff in the amount of $263.49 as against G