Cases

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Rothman v. Rothman, 93 So.3d 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). STEVENSON, CIKLIN, JJ„ and MORGAN, DAVID C., Associate Judge, concur.

GLAZER, J., Plaintiff’s third motion for partial summary judgment requires this court to *441determine whether real property located at 1700-12 N. Front Street, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was owned by corporate defendant Roland Investments, Inc. at the time said property was sold to a third party. For the reasons below, this court finds that the property was owned by

859 S.W.2d 654 (1993) 43 Ark.App. 60 Deborah Ann ROLAND (Archer), Appellant, v. Jeffery Neil ROLAND, Appellee. No. CA 93-122. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II. August 25, 1993. *655 Meredith Wineland, Benton, for appellant. PITTMAN, Judge. Appellant, Deborah Ann Roland, and appellee,

2023 IL 128366 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 128366) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellant, v. FRANK ROLAND, Appellee. Opinion filed November 30, 2023. JUSTIC

People v Roland (2025 NY Slip Op 00991) People v Roland 2025 NY Slip Op 00991 Decided on February 19, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

2022 IL App (1st) 173013 No. 1-17-3013 March 07, 2022 FIRST DIVISION IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, )

[Cite as State v. Roland, 2021-Ohio-4077.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NOS. C-210299 C-210300 Plaintiff-Appellee, : TRIAL NOS. B-1901497 B-2004037 vs.

Case: 22-20588 Document: 200-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/07/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-20588 FILED

Per Curiam. DISMISSED . See Baker v. State , 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). Roberts, Wetherell, and Makar, JJ., concur.

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2024-0751 _____________________________ GREGORY ROLAND, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________ Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction. March 5, 2025 PER CURIAM. DISMISSED as unauthorized. See Baker v. St

519 So.2d 1177 (1987) Harry L. ROLAND, Sr. v. Elizabeth Ann McClendon ROLAND. No. 86 CA 1496. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. December 22, 1987. On Rehearing February 24, 1988. *1178 Arnold Gibbs, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellee Harry L. Roland, Sr. John A. London, III, Baton Rouge, for de

VACATED. REMANDED.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2659 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROLAND BLACK, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

USCA11 Case: 21-14396 Document: 43-1 Date Filed: 09/26/2023 Page: 1 of 18 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-14396 ____________________ ROLAND EDGER,

Order entered February 10, 2023 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00049-CV CHAD KRIMM, Appellant V. CALVIN ROLAND, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT KERSTIN WEINSTEIN, Appellant, v. ROLAND BERGER, Appellee. No. 4D2023-0281 [April 18, 2024] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Laura C. Bur

USCA11 Case: 21-14396 Document: 48-1 Date Filed: 10/20/2023 Page: 1 of 20 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-14396 ____________________ ROLAND EDGER,

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 25, 2020. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-543 Lower Tribunal No. 19-12886A ________________ Roland Eleby, Appel

FIRST DIVISION BARNES, P. J., GOBEIL and MARKLE, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS

Affirmed.