Cases

Appellate Case: 24-3015 Document: 51-1 Date Filed: 01/17/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 17, 2025

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 10/03/2025 09:09 AM CDT -1- Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 320 Nebraska Reports STATE V. PRICE Cite as 320 Neb. 1 State of Nebraska, appel

JUSTICE ALBIN delivered the opinion of the Court. In this interlocutory appeal, we must determine two issues: what is the appropriate standard of appellate review of a trial court’s factual findings based solely on the court’s viewing of a video-recorded police interrogation, and did defendant invoke his right to remain silent during the interrogation. Relying solely on a review of the video

Case: 15-31114 Document: 283-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/27/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 15-31114 March 27, 2025

630 F.3d 62 (2011) Troy BROWN, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Paul RUANE, Respondent, Appellee. No. 09-2508. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard May 6, 2010. Decided January 5, 2011. *63 Dennis Shedd for appellant. Jessica V. Barnett, Assistant Attorney General, with whom Martha Coakley, Attorn

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) State v. S.S. (A-84-15) (077486) Argued February 27, 2017 -- Decided June 21, 2017 Albi

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J. ¶ 146. (dissenting.) "Advances in technology offer great benefits to society in many areas. At the same time, they can pose significant risks to individual privacy rights."1 The proliferation of cell phones and their location tracking capabilities exemplify the risks to privacy rights posed by technological advancement. ¶ 147. The criminal cases <

NUMBER 13-10-00643-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG MIRNA MATIANA GARCIA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 332nd District Court of

Justice HOENS delivered the opinion of the Court. In this appeal we consider whether defendant’s request for permission to speak with his mother in the midst of his custodial interrogation was an assertion of his right to silence that required the investigating officers to cease their questioning. The trial court concluded that it was and ordered the suppression of all of the statements made by defendant aft

Opinion BAXTER, J. On a clear evening in February 2007, defendant Richard Tom broadsided at high speed a vehicle driven by Loraine Wong, who was making a left turn from Santa Clara Avenue onto Woodside Road in Redwood City. Wong’s younger daughter, Sydney Ng, eight, was killed; her older daughter, Kendall Ng, 10, sustained serious injuries. The evidence at trial showed that defendant did not brake prior to t

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CANDACE L. FOX, No. 13-56704 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-06933-AG-SS DEBORAH K. JOHNSON, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge, Presiding

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 JUDITH C. HERRERA, District Judge. This case is before the Court on Defendant John Charles McCluskey’s Motion to Szippress Statements [Doc. No. 293], filed January 30, 2012. In the motion, Defendant seeks to suppress statements that he made to FBI Agent James Rominger on August 20, 2010 and statements that he made to FB

PER CURIAM. David James Martin appeals his convictions of first-degree murder and armed robbery and his sentence of death. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons stated below, we affirm his convictions and sentences. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On August 15, 2008, a grand jury indicted the appellant, David James Martin, on one count of first-

OPINION McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. Daryl Lawrence appeals his convictions and sentences for armed bank robbery, attempted armed bank robbery, murder, and firearms offenses. Most of the twenty-four asserted claims of error relate to proceedings on the two death-eligible offenses and the resultant sentence of death. Despite vigorous and able advocacy by Lawrenc

PALMER, J. **4*6The sole issue now before us in this appeal by the respondent, the Commissioner of Correction, **5is whether the habeas court properly concluded that the petitioner, Mi

49 Cal.4th 405 (2010) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DAVID EARL WILLIAMS, Defendant and Appellant. No. S029490. Supreme Court of California. June 28, 2010. *414 Lynne S. Coffin and Michael J. Hersek, State Public Defenders, under appointment by the Supreme Court, Jay Colangelo and Andrew S. Love, Assistant State Public

787 F.Supp.2d 504 (2011) Ramon Torres HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent. Civil No. SA-08-CA-827-OG. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. May 13, 2011. *509 Robin R. Norris, Jr., Attorney at Law, El Paso,

*977DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER: (1) DENYING PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND/OR DISCOVERY ON CLAIMS 4-8, 10-11, 25-27, AND 29-31; (2) DENYING RESPONDENT’S REQUEST TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS ON THE BASIS OF STATE PROCEDURAL BARS; (3) DENYING HABEAS RELIEF ON CLAIMS 1-8, 10-11, AND 13-38 IN THE FIRST AMENDED PETITION; AND

236 F.Supp.2d 750 (2002) Kylleen HARGRAVE-THOMAS, Petitioner, v. Joan YUKINS, Respondent. Civil Case No. 00-040171. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 21, 2002. *751 *752 *753 *754 Bri