Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “Romero v. Cellmark, Inc.”
Thompson v. Spitzerpublic domain
Filed 4/11/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE WILLIAM THOMPSON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, G060988 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2021-01184633) TODD SPITZER et al., OPINION D
Thompson v. Spitzerpublic domain
Filed 5/5/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE WILLIAM THOMPSON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, G060988 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2021-01184633) TODD SPITZER et al.,
People v. Sanchezpublic domain
Filed 12/11/14 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE PEOPLE, H037353 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 211268) v. GENE SANCHEZ et al., Defendants and Appellants. This appeal follows a mont
People v. Bakerpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PAUL WESLEY BAKER, Defendant and Appellant. S170280 Los Angeles County Superior Court LA045977 February 1, 2021 Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye authored the opinion of the Court, in which Just
State v. Huettlpublic domain
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'04- 13:58:14 2013.03.13 Certiorari Granted, March 1, 2013, No. 34,009 IN THE COURT OF APP
Rios v. Perez Valentinpublic domain
Rodríguez García, Juez Ponente *271TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA RESOLUCION El peticionario Felipe Pérez Valentín, objeto de una acción de filiación de parte de un demandante mayor de edad, acude ante este Tribunal requiriendo expidamos auto de certiorari para revocar una Resolución del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala de Aguadilla (Hon. Miguel
People v. Blessettpublic domain
Filed 4/30/18 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- THE PEOPLE, C074267 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 12F01121) v. ANTOINE L
People v. Bertsch and Hronispublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOHN ANTHONY BERTSCH and JEFFERY LEE HRONIS, Defendants and Appellants. S093944 Sacramento County Superior Court 94F07295 April 20, 2026 Chief Justice Guerrero authored the opinion of the Court, in which Justices Corri
People v. Blessettpublic domain
Filed 5/24/18 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- THE PEOPLE, C074267 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 1
Fishback v. Peoplepublic domain
Justice MULLARKEY concurring in the result: In this case, the majority affirms the decision of the court of appeals allowing identification testimony based on DNA testing. The majority determines that, at the time of trial, the DNA test results and statistical analysis of such results were generally accepted by the scientific community and thereby admissible under the test of Frye v. United States,
State v. Andersonpublic domain
853 P.2d 135 (1993) 115 N.M.App. 433 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jay Allen ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 12899. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. January 28, 1993. Certiorari Granted March 11, 1993. *136 Tom Udall, Atty. Gen., Margaret McLean, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe,