Cases

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VIII Fior Daliza Félix APELACIÓN Rodríguez procedente del Tribunal de Primera Apelada Instancia, Sala Superior de San vs.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ROMERO ORTIZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-3508 [June 21, 2018] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; William W. H

243 P.3d 498 (2010) 238 Or. App. 343 STATE v. ROMERO-ORTIZ. No. A142805 Court of Appeals of Oregon. October 20, 2010. Affirmed without opinion.

PAEZ, J., dissenting in part: I respectfully dissent from the court’s holding that the instructional error under United States v. Lopez, 484 F.3d 1186 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc), was harmless. We have found jury-instruction errors to be harmless where the erroneous instruction went to an element which was “uncontested and supported by overwhelming evidence.” United States v.

PER CURIAM: * Chester Enrique Romero-Ortiz appeals his guilty-plea conviction for being an alien found in the United States after deportation subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction. The district court sentenced Romero-Ortiz to 33 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. To the extent that Romero-Ortiz’s challenge to the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 is construed a

Affirmed.

CHÁVEZ, Justice (specially concurring). {28} I agree with the majority that the State has no jurisdiction in these cases. In each case the accused is an enrolled member of the pueblo, which satisfies the definition of Indian within the Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1153, and the crimes occurred within the exterior boundaries of the pueblo. I share the view th

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jorge Romero-Alarcon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A

514 F.3d 115 (2008) Wilfredo DIAZ-ROMERO, M.D.; Luz Ariana Ortiz-Colon; Conjugal Partnership Diaz-Ortiz, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Michael B. MUKASEY,[*] Attorney General; Richard E. Chavez, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center, Guaynabo, PR; Edward Gonzalez, Warden, in his official and personal capacities; Noemi Potts, in her official and personal capacities; Dr. Olga Grajales, in her official and personal capacities; A-Z Insu

805 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2011) Victoria STARK-ROMERO, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Fred P. Stark, Plaintiff, and Emilio J. Esquibel and Helen G. Esquibel, Individually and as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Michael S. Esquibel, deceased, Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. The NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER COMPANY (AMTRAK), Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF), City of Las Vegas, San Miguel County an

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Extend Deadlines and Request for Expedited Briefing, filed June 9, 2011 (Doe. 90). The Court held a hearing on July 6, 2011. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court should order expedited briefing on Plaintiff Emilio J. Esqui-bel’s and Helen G. Esquibel’s motion; an

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant BNSF Railway Company’s Motion to Compel Answers to Requests for Admission, filed May 25, 2011 (Doc. 88). The Court held a hearing on July 6, 2011. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court should deem admitted certain requests for admission (“RFA”) that Defendant BNSF Railway Co

763 F.Supp.2d 1231 (2011) Victoria STARK-ROMERO, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Fred P. Stark, Plaintiff, and Emilio J. Esquibel and Helen G. Esquibel, Individually and as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Michael S. Esquibel, deceased, Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. The NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER COMPANY (Amtrak), Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF), City of Las Vegas, San Miguel County an

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs-Intervenors’ Motion to Compel the National Railroad Passenger Company a/k/a Amtrak and BNSF Railway Company to Fully Respond to Discovery, filed June 23, 2011 (Doc. 98). The Court held a hearing on July 14, 2011. The primary issue is whether the Court should compel Defendants The

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL X RAMÓN L. ORTIZ ORTIZ REVISIÓN JUDICIAL MARITZA MARRERO procedente de la APONTE Oficina del Comisionado de Recurrentes KLRA202400570 Instituciones

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL1 JOCELYN ROMERO Apelación procedente ROMERO del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Apelante Sala de Carolina

275 F.Supp.2d 177 (2003) Carlos ROMERO-BARCELO, Petitioner, v. Anibal ACEVEDO-VILA, Respondent. No. 00-091(JAF). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 31, 2003. *178 *179 *180 *181 Edward Borges, Esq., Jane

376 F.Supp.2d 1131 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Juan MORALES-ORTIZ, Defendant. No. CR 03-1890 JB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. November 4, 2004. *1132 *1133 David Iglesias, United States Attorney, Erlinda O. Johnson, Assistant United States Attorney, Albuquerq

Appellate Case: 23-8056 Document: 63-1 Date Filed: 03/26/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH March 26, 2025

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CANDELARIA DE LOS ANGELES No. 23-576 CORPENO-ROMERO; JAVI Agency Nos. ALEXANDER CORNEJO- A215-944-680 CORPENO, A215-944-681 Petitioners, OPINION v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Resp