Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “Ronald D. Dagen”
Williams v. Federal Land Bank of Jacksonpublic domain
729 F.Supp. 1387 (1990) Kathleen Saunders WILLIAMS, Individually, and Katherine Saunders Williams, Executrix of the Estate of Elizabeth George Saunders, Deceased, Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL LAND BANK OF JACKSON, Federal Land Bank Association of Jackson, and Farm Credit System Assistance Board, as Successor in Interest to the Farm Credit System Capitol Corporation, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 88-888. United Sta
Morin v. Nationwide Federal Credit Unionpublic domain
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the defendants, Nationwide Federal Credit Union, et. al. (collectively “NFCU”), move this court for a protective order with respect to the deposition of Michael Weisenburger by the plaintiffs, Ronald P. Morin, Sr., et. al. (Dkt.#49). The plaint
845 F.Supp. 1427 (1994) INTERNATIONAL TELE-MARINE CORPORATION, f/k/a International Tele-Coin Company, Inc., Plaintiff, v. MALONE & ASSOCIATES, INC., a dissolved Colorado corporation, Brenman Raskin & Friedlob, P.C., a Colorado professional corporation, Edmund L. Epstein, and Donna A. Key, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 93-K-1364. United States District Court, D. Colorado. Marc
Sherbine v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: March 27, 2020 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** TERESA SHERBINE, * PUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 17-413V * v. * Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge: In this case of first impression, interpreting 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6), we hold that one who knowingly commingles legitimate funds with the funds of a co-investor, where the co-investor’s funds are subject to forfeiture, is not an “innocent owner,” under the statute, and subjects the legitimate funds to forfeiture. FACTS In 1985, Curtis Spears approached his
Frick v. Patrickpublic domain
165 Mich. App. 689 (1988) 419 N.W.2d 55 FRICK v. PATRICK Docket Nos. 94681, 94691. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided January 19, 1988. Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service (by Patricia A. Stamler and Barry Smith), for plaintiffs. Currie, Stieper, Haddrill & Seyferth, P.C. (by Robert M. Currie
933 F.2d 976 60 USLW 2018 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.ONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 15603 85TH AVENUENORTH, LAKE PARK, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, including thereal estate at that location, the appurtenances thereunto,and the improvements thereon, Defendant,Gary G. Spears, Claimant-Appellant,George Curtis Spears, Claimant. No. 90-5387.
James Bocock v. HC2 Holdings, Inc.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JAMES BOCOCK, VENTURI ) ANDERSONI, LLC, JOHN N. KYLE ) II, KRISTINA C. BRUNI, PAUL ) DESTEFANIS, PAULA ABERLE, ) MICHAEL DAGEN, ENTRUST ) FREEDOM/YVONNE WOOD, ) EQUITY TRUST/J.M. HUISINGA, ) IRWIN PODHAJSER, JAMES ) GALLAGHER, JONATHAN ) HEISTEN, LINDA KLINK, MICHAEL ) L. ROBERTS, PAVAN ANAND, ) PHYLLIS COHEN, RONALD R. ) TILLER, TYLER W
HRN, Inc. v. Shell Oil Company, Motiva Enterprises, L.L.C., Equilon Enterprise, L.L.C., and Equiva Services, L.L.C.public domain
Affirmed in Part and Reversed and Remanded in Part and Opinion filed February 13, 2003 Affirmed in Part and Reversed and Remanded in Part and Opinion filed February 13, 2003.
HRN, Inc. v. Shell Oil Co.public domain
102 S.W.3d 205 (2003) HRN, INC., et al.,[1] Appellants, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, Motiva Enterprises, L.L.C., Equilon Enterprises, L.L.C., and Equiva Services, L.L.C., Appellees. No. 14-01-00597-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). February 13, 2003. Rehearing Overruled May 1, 2003. *207 Ge
Glittenberg v. Doughboy Recreational Industries, Incpublic domain
436 Mich. 673 (1990) 462 N.W.2d 348 GLITTENBERG v. DOUGHBOY RECREATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC Docket No. 85391, (Calendar No. 4). Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued April 3, 1990. Decided September 28, 1990. Lopatin, Miller, Freedman, Bluestone, Erlich, Rosen & Bartnick (by Richard E. Shaw) for the plaintiffs.