Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ronald Kitchen”
Kitchen v. Burgepublic domain
781 F.Supp.2d 721 (2011) Ronald KITCHEN, Plaintiff, v. Jon BURGE, et al., Defendants. No. 10 C 4093. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 19, 2011. *725 G. Flint Taylor, Jr., Alexa Anne Van Brunt, Benjamin H. Elson, J. Samuel Tenenbaum, Joey L. Mogul, Sarah Jeanette Gelsomino, Locke E. Bowman, III,
Roberson v. Kitchenpublic domain
12 So.3d 813 (2009) Darryl W. ROBERSON and Leslie A. Hardy Roberson, Appellants, v. Larrie A. KITCHEN and Julie A. Kitchen, Appellees. No. 5D08-2218. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. May 15, 2009. W.C. Airth, Jr., of W.C. Airth, Jr., P.A., Orlando, for Appellants. Matthew G. Brenner and Ronald D. Edwards, Jr., of Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster,
People v. Kitchenpublic domain
727 N.E.2d 189 (1999) 189 Ill.2d 424 244 Ill.Dec. 890 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Ronald KITCHEN, Appellant. No. 83654. Supreme Court of Illinois. November 18, 1999. Modified on Denial of Rehearing April 3, 2000. *190 Richard E. Cunningham, Chi
People v. Kitchenpublic domain
CHIEF JUSTICE BILANDIC delivered the opinion of the court: Following a jury trial in the circuit court of Cook County, defendant, Ronald Kitchen, was convicted of five counts of murder. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 9 — 1(a)(1).) After finding defendant eligible for the death penalty based on the statutory aggravating factor of m
Ronald Shinstock v. State of Mississippipublic domain
MAXWELL, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Ronald Shinstock appeals his sale-of-methamphetamine conviction. He argues the trial court should have excluded some of the State’s evidence based on an alleged Fourth Amendment violation. But Shinstock concedes he never asserted a Fourth Amendment claim in the trial court. So he forfeited this issue. And the record does
Ernest Lane, III v. Ronald D. Lampkinpublic domain
CHAMBERLIN, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. The Chancery Court of Warren County, First Judicial District, found that Ronald Lampkin had breached his fiduciary duties to Limestone Products, Inc. (“Limestone”). 1 Lampkin and James Old-rum Smith'Jr. jointly owned and operated Limestone with a line of cred
Ronald W. McMorris v. Joe Tallypublic domain
DICKINSON, Presiding Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. More than three years after learning his insurance policy had expired and his agent had not procured a replacement policy, Joe Tally sued his insurance agent, Ronald McMorris, in tort, claiming he “breached a standard of care recognized in the State of Mississippi to the insured for not notifying [him] of the cancellation of [his insurance] policy.”
Joseph Ronald Hartfield v. State of Mississippipublic domain
DICKINSON, Presiding Justice, dissenting: ¶ 31. I fully agree with Justice Coleman’s well-reasoned view that the circuit *142judge erred by excluding Graham’s statements against interest. Because I believe the circuit judge also arbitrarily denied Hartfield’s right to exercise a peremptory strike, I write this dissent. ¶ 32. The circ
Ernest Lane, III v. Ronald D. Lampkinpublic domain
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI KITCHENS, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Limestone Products, Inc. (Limestone), jointly owned by Ronald (Ronnie) Lampkin and James Oldrum (J.O.) Smith, Jr., operated with a line of credit personally guaranteed by Lampkin and Smith. Limestone was in the business of selling rock, predominantly to Lampkin’s company, Lampki
Charles Ronald Brent v. Vennit B. Mathis, IIpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-IA-01074-SCT DR. CHARLES RONALD BRENT v. VENNIT B. MATHIS, II, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF VENNIT B. MATHIS, III AND ALEXA MATHIS, MINORS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/07/2013 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. BILLY JOE LANDRUM COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JONES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: WILLIAM EDWARD BALLA
Chapter 7 DECISION CARLA CRAIG, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge This matter comes before the Court on the motion of twelve settling parties to approve a global settlement of disputes related to the main bankruptcy case and adversary proceedings captioned above. ECF No. 47 (“Motion”).1 The Motion was filed by Robert L. Geltzer, as chapter 7 trustee
Kitchen v. Boyd (In re Newpower)public domain
KENNEDY, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which BOGGS and BATCHELDER, JJ., concurred except as to part III-B. BATCHELDER, J. (pp. 934-37), delivered a separate opinion, in which BOGGS, J., concurred, which constitutes the opinion of the court with respect to the issue addressed in part III— B. *926OPINION KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Kitchen v. Boyd (In Re Newpower)public domain
229 B.R. 691 (1999) In re George D. NEWPOWER, Debtor. Robert Kitchen, Harriet Kitchen and New Properties, Inc., Appellants, v. James W. Boyd, Appellee. No. 1:98-CV-418. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. January 22, 1999. *692 *693 Jonathan R. Moothart, Bowerma
KAREN MOULTON, * NO. 2020-CA-0090 INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS * SIMILARLY SITUATED COURT OF APPEAL * VERSUS FOURTH CIRCUIT * STEWART ENTERPRISES, STATE OF LOUISIANA INC., JOHN B. ELSTROTT, JR., * * * * * * * THOMAS M. KITCHEN, ALDEN J. MCDONALD, JR., RONAL
KAREN MOULTON, * NO. 2020-CA-0090 INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS * SIMILARLY SITUATED COURT OF APPEAL * VERSUS FOURTH CIRCUIT * STEWART ENTERPRISES, STATE OF LOUISIANA INC., JOHN B. ELSTROTT, JR., * * * * * * * THOMAS M. KITCHEN, ALDEN J. MCDONALD, JR., RONAL
Kitchen Suppliers, Inc. v. Erb Lumber Co.public domain
Per Curiam. Defendant Erb Lumber Company appeals as of right from a lower court order dismissing both its claim to foreclose a construction lien on the property of defendants Frank and Christine Johannes and its claim to collect the amount of the lien from defendant Homeowner Construction Lien Recovery Fund. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand. i On March 19, 1984, Erb supplied lum
Kitchen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Boardpublic domain
Opinion by Judge Cbaig, Donald Kitchen appeals from a Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board order affirming a referee’s dismissal of Mr. Kitchen’s claim petition under section 301(c) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act.1 We affirm. On May 26, 1978, Mr. Kitchen, a craneman for Mesta Machine Company, filed a claim petition alleging disability because of pu
Delaney Marks v. Ronald Davispublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DELANEY G. MARKS, No. 17-99007 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:11-cv- 02458-LHK v. RONALD DAVIS, Warden, OPINION California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Cal
State of Tennessee v. Ronald Turnerpublic domain
11/01/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 25, 2019 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RONALD TURNER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County Nos. 105481, 105636 Steven Wayne Sword, Judge ___________________________________
Ronald Eric Lofland v. Statepublic domain
FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., RICKMAN and BROWN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules October 13,