⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Rosa Mack”

People v. Mackpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015-03-04 · Published · cited 0× · 126 A.D.3d 724; 2 N.Y.S.3d 366
*725 Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Gulotta, J.), rendered July 9, 2013, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The def
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023-03-21 · Published · cited 63× · 63 F.4th 211
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 21-2472 _____________ CHARLES MACK, Appellant v. JOHN YOST, Warden; TIM KUHN, Associate Warden; JEFFREY STEPHENS, Trust Fund Officer; SAMUEL VENSLOSKY, Correctional officer, sued in their individual capacities; DOUG ROBERTS
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-12-03 · Published · cited 1× · 123 A.D.3d 731; 997 N.Y.S.2d 721
Appeal from two orders of the Family Court, Orange County (Andrew P. Bivona, J.), both entered August 29, 2013. The first order, insofar as appealed from, after a fact-finding hearing, dismissed the mother’s family offense petition. The second order, insofar as appealed from, after a fact-finding hearing, denied the mother’s motion to modify a custody and visitation order of the same court dated May 21, 2012, by a
People v. Rosapublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008-01-10 · Published · cited 5× · 47 A.D.3d 1009; 850 N.Y.S.2d 234
Peters, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Catena, J.), rendered September 12, 2003, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of burglary in the second degree. In the early morning hours of July 20, 2002, defendant and two others entered the victim’s apartment and removed appliances and furniture. A neighbor, who saw defendant removing the items, called the police. Up
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008-07-11 · Published · cited 63× · 953 A.2d 587; 2008 Pa. Super. 153; 2008 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1561
953 A.2d 587 (2008) COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellant v. Samell MACK. No. 58 Eastern District Appeal 2007. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted March 25, 2008. Filed July 11, 2008. *588 Hugh J. Burns, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, for Commonwealth, appellant. Michael P. Parkinson, Philad
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016-05-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA X’LAODAI CEIARA MACK, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-2365 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed May 19, 2016. An
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014-10-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA X'LAODAI CEIARA MACK, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D13-3766 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed October 31, 2014.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016-12-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA GERRARD D. JONES, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D16-2974 KARA L. MACK, AND FDOC., ET AL., Appellees. _____________________________/ Opin
Texas Supreme Court · 2006-10-27 · Published · cited 1664× · 206 S.W.3d 572; 50 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 80; 2006 Tex. LEXIS 1074; 2006 WL 3040534
206 S.W.3d 572 (2006) MACK TRUCKS, INC., Petitioner, v. Elizabeth TAMEZ et. al., Respondent. No. 03-0526. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued October 20, 2004. Decided October 27, 2006. Rehearing Denied December 22, 2006. *575 Sean E. Breen, Randy Howry, Herman Howry & Breen, L.L.P., Austin, Rober
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-01-22 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00533-CV 3865258 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
People v. Rosapublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996-09-09 · Published · cited 8× · 231 A.D.2d 534; 665 N.Y.S.2d 668; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8828
Appeal by the defen*535dant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Friedman, J.), rendered April 1, 1994, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defenda
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009-10-08 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-3254 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Distri
Casner v. Rosaspublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 1997-03-27 · Published · cited 28× · 943 S.W.2d 937; 1997 Tex. App. LEXIS 1578; 1997 WL 139359
943 S.W.2d 937 (1997) Mack Jay CASNER, Relator, v. Honorable Tom ROSAS, Justice of the Peace, Precinct Three, of El Paso County, Texas, Respondent. No. 08-97-00090-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. March 27, 1997. Mack Jay Casner, El Paso, for Relator. Tom Rosas, El Paso, pro se. Before BARAJAS, C.J., and McCLURE and CHEW, JJ.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996-07-25 · Published · cited 28× · 423 Mass. 288; 667 N.E.2d 867; 1996 Mass. LEXIS 174
Liacos, C.J. In December, 1993, a Suffolk County jury convicted the defendant, Keyma Mack, of premeditated murder in the first degree.1 Testimony came from various police *289officers and investigators, as well as four eyewitnesses to the events surrounding the homicide. On the evidence presented, the jmy could have found the following: On Mar
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00620-CV Rosa Obregon PEREZ, Ricardo O. Perez, Rosa Elia Perez, Maria Perez Jalomus, Juan Jose Perez, Julio Perez, Jr., and Fernando Perez, Appellants v.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2016-04-13 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00620-CV Rosa Obregon PEREZ, Ricardo O. Perez, Rosa Elia Perez, Maria Perez Jalomus, Juan Jose Perez, Julio Perez, Jr., and Fernando Perez, Appellants v.
Hawley v. LaRocquepublic domain
North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004-11-19 · Published · cited 4× · 2004 ND 215; 689 N.W.2d 386; 2004 N.D. LEXIS 351; 2004 WL 2650275
689 N.W.2d 386 (2004) 2004 ND 215 Rosa HAWLEY, f/k/a Rosa LaRocque, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Sam D. LaROCQUE, Defendant and Appellee. No. 20040057. Supreme Court of North Dakota. November 19, 2004. *387 Michael S. McIntee, McIntee Law Firm, Bottineau, N.D., for plaintiff and appellant. Galen J. M
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940-12-20 · Published · cited 27× · 12 S.E.2d 235; 218 N.C. 697; 1940 N.C. LEXIS 68
This is an action for the alleged wrongful death of the plaintiff's intestate. C. S., 160. Marshall Field Company contracted with the Southeastern Construction Company to build an addition to its sheeting mill at Draper, N.C. according to plans and specifications prepared by Robert Company, architects, and the Southeastern Construction Company sublet the construction of the steel work to J. L. Coe, and the plaintiff's intestate, John Hunter, was an employee of J. L. Coe. The a
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2015-03-19 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-13-00658-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG JAIME SALINAS AND ROSA SALINAS, Appellants, v. TONY MARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GENERAL PARTNER OF MARTINEZ, BARRERA, & MARTINEZ, LLP., Appellees. On appeal from the 197th District Court of