Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Rosalie v. Supreme Glass Co., Inc.”
Rosalie Bacon v. New Jersey State Departmentpublic domain
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2452-14T1 ROSALIE BACON, individually and on behalf of G.P., Z.P., J.B., M.B., D.B., and Z.H.; JOSEPH BARUFFI, individually and on behalf of J.B.; ELIZABETH CULLEN, individually and APPROVED F
Rosalie Cullen v. Olin Corporationpublic domain
COFFEY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellee Rosalie Cullen (“Cullen”) was forty-nine years of age and was employed by the Defendant-Appellant Olin Corporation (“Olin”) as a manager of marketing administration when she was terminated in February of 1996 because, according to Olin, a Reduction in Force (“RIF”) was necessary due to a turn in the economy.
Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.public domain
17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN
Vaccaro v. Shell Beach Condominium, Inc.public domain
BEAR, J. The plaintiff, Enrico Vaccaro, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, Shell Beach Condominium, Inc. (association), and certain individual members of its board of directors, Andrew Hames, Frank Meolli, Michael Gagliardi, Michelle Augliera, and Raymond Vermette (individually named defendants), on the basis that all of the plaint
Pitchford v. Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc.public domain
124 F.Supp.2d 958 (2000) Kimberly R. PITCHFORD, Plaintiff, v. OAKWOOD MOBILE HOMES, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 5:99CV00053. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Harrisonburg Division. November 13, 2000. *959 *960 Timothy Earl Cupp, Cupp & Cupp, P.C., Harrisonburg, V
Ramos v. Davis & Geck, Inc.public domain
64 F.Supp.2d 6 (1999) Rafael RAMOS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DAVIS & GECK, INC., Defendant. No. CIV. 94-2737(HL). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 31, 1999. *7 Herbert W. Brown, III, Brown & Ubarri, San Juan, PR, for Rafael Ramos, Elsa Gonzalez-Sanchez, Conjugal Partnership Ramos-Gonzalez, Carlos E. Ramo
OPINION AND ORDER PIERAS, District Judge. The Court has before it codefendant Puer-to Rico Development Fund’s Motion for Summary Judgment, plaintiffs opposition, and their respective supplements (docket Nos. 22, 31, 41, and 61). On November 4, 1977, Puerto Rico Development Fund (“PRDF”), sent plaintiff, Caribbean Mushroom Co., Inc., (“Caribbean”), a commitment letter through
755 F.Supp. 1330 (1991) Rosalie Lena YEATER and Rosalie Lena Yeater, as Executrix of the Estate of Robert Yeater, Plaintiff, v. ALLIED CHEMICAL COMPANY and Olin Corporation, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 88-00017-W(S). United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia. January 15, 1991. *1331 *1332 D
Shutka v. Pennsylvania RR Co.public domain
74 N.J. Super. 381 (1962) 181 A.2d 400 ROSALIE SHUTKA, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF STEPHEN SHUTKA, JR., DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued November 13, 1961. Decided May 21, 1962.
In re Church E. Gates & Co.public domain
CHASE, Circuit Judge. The debtor, a New York Corporation, was organized to, and did, engage in the business of dealing in lumber in the Bronx, in the City of New York. It owned real estate there which in 1935 was encumbered by a mortgage of which the Mortgage Commission of the State of New York had the legal title, possession and control by virtue of the provisions of Chapter 19 of the Laws of New York (1935), as amended, kn
State v. Kennedypublic domain
[Cite as State v. Kennedy, 2018-Ohio-4172.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT LOGAN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 8-18-01 v. ROSALIE N. KENNEDY, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Logan County Common Pleas Court Trial Co
v. Cielo Vista Ranchpublic domain
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.
Richardson v. Gov't of the Virgin Islandspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION (September 16, 2011) Maurice Richardson (“Richardson”) appeals his conviction in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands for conspiracy to commit murder, murder, and unlawful possession of a firearm. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDUAL BACKGROUND “After a jury has returned a guilty verdict we are bound to interpret the evidence in the light most favorable to the [G]
Estate of Strangi v. Commissionerpublic domain
COHEN, Judge: On December 1, 1998, respondent determined a $2,545,826 deficiency in the Federal estate tax of the Estate of Albert Strangi, Rosalie. Gulig, independent executrix. In the alternative, respondent determined a Federal gift tax deficiency of $1,629,947. After concessions by the parties, the issues for decision are (alternatively): (1) Whether the Strangi Family
Succession of Linderpublic domain
FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER, Judge. [i>This Court is intimately familiar with the facts of this case as it has had a long and protracted history, spanning over a period of seventeen years. In 1998, we affirmed the trial court’s ruling and determined that the provision of the decedent’s testament disinheriting a forced heir was invalid. Succession of Linder, 97-1269 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/30/98), 717 So.2d 1276 (unpubl
McGlothlin v. Murraypublic domain
993 F.Supp. 389 (1997) John McGLOTHLIN, Plaintiff, v. Edward MURRAY, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 93-0981-R. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division. February 13, 1997. *390 *391 *392 John Patton McGlothlin, Bland, VA, pro se.
Lynn v. STATE DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESpublic domain
125 P.3d 202 (2005) 130 Wash.App. 829 Jimmy LYNN, Appellant, v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Respondent. No. 55251-1-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. December 19, 2005. *203 Donna L. Mack, Seattle, WA, for Appellant. Portia Therese C. Guerrero, Office of the A
Hasnudeen v. Onan Corp.public domain
552 N.W.2d 555 (1996) Robert HASNUDEEN and Tracy Hines, Appellants, v. ONAN CORPORATION, Respondent. No. CX-94-2106. Supreme Court of Minnesota. August 29, 1996. *556 Bassford, Lockhart, Truesdell & Briggs, P.A., John M. Anderson, Charles E. Lundberg, Minneapolis, for Appellants. Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon & Vogt, P.
Looks Twice v. Whidbypublic domain
569 N.W.2d 459 (1997) 1997 SD 120 Georgine L. LOOKS TWICE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Julian WHIDBY and Evelyn Whidby, D/B/A Stockmans Lounge and Liquors, Defendants and Appellees, and Jean Adele Ghost, Deloris L. Long Soldier and Jacqueline Judith Palmier, Defendants. No. 19716. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs September 10, 1997
Mosby v. Gov't of the Virgin Islandspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION (September 16, 2011) Appellant Gent Mosby (“Mosby”) was convicted on August 19, 1996, of conspiracy to commit murder, first-degree murder, unauthorized possession of a firearm, and threatening a witness, all in connection with *1151the murder of Stephen Hodge.1 He was sentenced to life imprisonment. Mosby’s