Cases

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00792-CV Richard Leon ROSE, Appellant v. Peter G. ADAMS,

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 5, 2019 No. 04-19-00792-CV Richard Leon ROSE, Appellant v. Peter G. ADAMS, Appellee

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-19-00792-CV Richard Leon ROSE, Appellant v. Peter G. ADA

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 1, 2005 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROSE MARY ADAMS Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Weakley County No. CR3-2004 William B. Acree, Jr., Judge No. W2004-01650-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 2, 2005 After the trial court denied her motion to suppress, the defendant, Rose Mary Adam

Opinion by JUDGE FEINBERG. Not to be published in full.

03/26/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 1, 2024 PATRICK M. MALONE v. JAMES WILLIAM ROSE, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 19CV-48249 Michael Binkley, Judge

Adams, Judge. Linda Rose (“Linda”) and Joy Garcia (“Joy”) appeal the trial court’s order of declaratory judgment in an action filed by “Colleen Waldrip [‘Colleen’] as Administrator with Will Annexed of the Estate of Lee R. Waldrip [‘Waldrip’].” In that order, the trial court enforced the “after-acquired property” clauses contained in a “Revocable Living Trust” agreement (the “Trust Agreement”) establishing the “Lee R. Waldrip

Clark, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Sypniewski, J.), rendered September 21, 2015, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the third degree (two counts). Defendant waived indictment and agreed to be charged in a superior court informati

Mercier, Judge. *340 A jury found David Lewis Adams, Jr. guilty of rape, aggravated child molestation, incest, aggravated sodomy, child molestation (four counts), electronically furnishing obscene materials to a minor, and cruelty to children.

Devine, J. Cross appeals from an order of the Family Court of Chenango County (Revoir Jr., J.), entered August 9, 2013, which, among other things, granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, to modify a prior order of custody. Petitioner (hereinafter the mother) and respondent (hereinafter the father) are the unmarried parents of a son (born in 2008). The parties — wh

Devine, J. Cross appeals from an order of the Family Court of Chenango County (Revoir Jr., J.), entered August 9, 2013, which, among other things, granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, to modify a prior order of custody. Petitioner (hereinafter the mother) and respondent (hereinafter the father) are the unmarried parents of a son (born in 2008). The parties — wh

ORDER PER CURIAM: Robert Adams appeals from the trial court’s entry of judgment convicting him of trespass in the first degree. Adams argues that the trial court erred in finding him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt because there was insufficient evidence presented at trial to demonstrate that Adams had been given actual notice that he was not allowed to visit the property. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b). <

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of an employment contract, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered December 6, 2007, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the second and third causes of action, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied his cross motion, in effect, for summary judgment on those causes of action or, in

Opinion CORRIGAN, J. May a claim of unlawful business practice under California’s unfair competition law be based on violations of a federal statute after Congress has repealed a provision of that statute authorizing civil actions for damages? We hold that it may when Congress has also made it plain that state laws consistent with the federal statute are not

In re ConocoPhillips Company f/k/a Phillips Petroleum Company; Shell Offshore Inc.; Shell Oil Company; SWEPI LP; — Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. K, No. 624-278; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. ll-CA-1157. Denied. VICTORY, J., would grant.

Justice Pearce, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION ¶ 1 The district court disbarred Susan Rose for violations of Utah's Rules of Professional Conduct in cases Rose handled in both federal and state courts. Her disbarment came after the district court struck her answer and entered default judgment against her. The disbarment did not come sudde

MARC E. JOHNSON, Judge. | sPlaintiffs/Appellants, Ms. Dottie Adams, et al., appeal the sustaining of the peremptory exceptions of prescription in favor of Defendants/Appellees, Conoco-Phillips Company (hereinafter referred to as “Conoco”) and Shell Oil Company, Shell Offshore, Inc. and SWEPI LP (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Shell”) from the 24th Judicial District Court, Division “K”. For the following reasons,

Douglas, J. In the instant appeal, appellant is seeking further review of the trial court’s judgment overruling her Civ. R. 60(B) motion on the basis that appellant had not sustained her burden of demonstrating that ,her failure to file a timely answer in this cause was due to excusable neglect. *19The specific issue posed to this court involves the quantum of evidence nece

OPINION AND ORDER SEIBEL, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 19), and Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 27). For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED and Plaintiffs Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND The facts relevant to the disposition of the instant Motions, which are essenti

Clark, J. Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 9, 2015, which ruled, among other things, that claimant violated Workers’ Compensation Law § 114-a and disqualified him from receiving future workers’ compensation benefits. Claimant sustained a compensable injury to his lower back in December 2007 and was awarded workers’ compensation benefits from January