Cases

Per Curiam. December 21, 1960, the Wayne probate court entered an order allowing the second account of the executors, directing partial distribution of the estate, and approving for payment certain executors’ and counsel fees. The order also directed partial distribution of the estate. All this was done pursuant to a petition filed July 13, 1960, by the coexecutors. Such partial distribution was in accordance with that constructi

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge This motion for appellate attorney’s fees comes at the end of long and complex litigation under the Voting Rights Act. As Texas appealed the decision of a three-judge court in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia that

OPINION In this ad valorem tax case resolved on cross motions for summary judgment, Marathon Ashland Petroleum L.L.C. (Marathon)1 appeals the trial court's judgment in favor of Galveston Central Appraisal District (GCAD). Marathon contends the trial court erred because GCAD's taxation of Marathon's petroleum products awaiting transportation to out-of-state customers violates the Commerce Clause of the

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PRIVILEGE CLAIMS ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. The State of Texas seeks preclearance of its redistricting plans for the U.S. House of Representatives, State House of Representatives, and State Senate, pursuant to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended (“VRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1973 et seq.

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge This matter presents a case study in how not to respond to a motion for attorney fees and costs. At issue is whether defendant-intervenors, who prevailed in Voting Rights Act litigation before a three judge panel, may recoup attorney fees and costs even though the Supreme Court vacated that opinion in l

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLYER, District Judge. In the summer of 2011, the Texas legislature redrew the boundaries for voting districts in the State to account for the report of the 2010 Census that its population had grown in the last decade by more than four million people, about two-thirds of whom are Hispanic. As required by Section 5 of the Voting Right

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) STATE OF TEXAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1303 ) (TBG-RMC-BAH

145 S.W.3d 203 (2004) In re VAN WATERS & ROGERS, INC., Relator. No. 03-0777. Supreme Court of Texas. September 3, 2004. *205 Lansford O. Ireson, Gina Lucero Miller, Ireson & Weizel, P.C., Karen K. Maston, Baker & Botts, L.L.P., Houston, Eduardo R. Rodriguez, Rodriguez, Colvin, Chaney & Saenz, L.L.P., Brownsville, James L.

787 N.W.2d 941 (2010) 2010 WI App 88 John ADAMS, Linda Adams, Mike Johnson, Ann Johnson, Verne Wilkie, Rosemary Wilkie, Richard Massen and Darlene Massen, Plaintiffs-Respondents,[†] v. STATE of Wisconsin LIVESTOCK FACILITIES SITING REVIEW BOARD, Defendant-Co-Appellant, Larson Acres, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant. Town of Magnolia, Petitioner-Respondent,[†] v. State of Wisconsin Livestock

814 F.Supp. 538 (1993) Tommy DOLLAR, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Stallworth Buick Pontiac GMC Truck, Inc., and Rex Brown, Jr. d/b/a Nehls Chevrolet Oldsmobile Cadillac, Defendants. No. 2:92cv165. United States District Court, E.D.Texas, Marshall Division. January 13, 1993.

31 So.3d 273 (2010) Michelle McROY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D09-1571. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. March 26, 2010. *274 Robert Wesley, Public Defender, and Rosemarie Farrell, Assistant Public Defender, Orlando, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and A

McHUGH, Circuit Judge. Current and former employees (Employees) of the Jefferson County Sheriffs Office (County) brought a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), alleging they were paid overtime at a lower rate than required by the statute during 2010, 2011, and 2012. The district court granted the County’s motion to dismiss the Employees’ Third Amended Compl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JOSE RENAN MARTINEZ MATUTE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 18-1926 (RMC) ) CNN CONSTRUCTION INC., et al

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J. ¶ 67. (dissenting). This is the first case that the Wisconsin Livestock Facility Siting Review Board has had involving Wis. Stat. § 93.90, the Siting Law. It is also the first Siting Law case to come to this court. ¶ 68. The Siting Law is a complex statute. It is difficult to fit its various provisions together with the related provisions of the Wisconsin Administrative Code

227 S.W.3d 652 (2007) In re ALLIED CHEMICAL CORPORATION, et al., Relator. No. 04-1023. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued November 16, 2005. Decided June 15, 2007. *653 Robert G. Newman, and Rosemarie Kanusky, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., San Antonio, R. Bruce Hurley, David G. Oliveira, Roerig Oliveira & Fisher, Brow

ROTHENBERG, J. Truly Nolen of America, Inc. (“Truly Nolen”) appeals a trial court order finding that it waived its right to compel arbitration by filing a motion to transfer venue based on forum non conveniens while simultaneously filing a motion to compel arbitration. Because the actions taken by Truly Nolen were not inconsistent with its right to enforce the mandatory arbitrat

665 S.E.2d 589 (2008) Connie H. JERNIGAN, Plaintiff v. Bobby B. McLAMB and wife, Sonja McClamb; Rosemary McLamb Herring and husband, Carl Herring; Melanie Lou McLamb Patrick, single; Iva Estelle Jernigan, single; Cape Fear Farm Credit; and Henry T. McDuffie, Trustee. No. COA07-1540. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 2, 2008.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 6, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D19-1597 Lower Tribunal No. 17-8521 ________________ Margery Glickman and Fred Glickman,

05/02/1984 App for WOE / Disposed REFUSED 06/20/1984 Motion for Rehearing Disposed OVERRULED OPINION This is an appeal from a judgment entered in a will contest. The transcript and statement of facts were due to be filed in this court on June 13, 1983. Any request for extension of time for late filing was due by June 28, 1983. A motion to extend time to file a statement of facts was received June 8, 1983. However, a motion to extend time to file the transcript was not

Hines, J. On October 24, 1996, a jury convicted the defendant, Shawn T. Fritz, of murder in the first degree of Albert Tyler Titcomb, III, on the theories of deliberate premeditation and extreme atrocity or cruelty, and of unlawful possession of a firearm. 1 The defendant’s appe