Cases

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00789-CV Christopher Murray, Appellant v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Services, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF BASTROP COUNTY NO. 07-11795, HONORABLE H. R. TOWSLEE, JUDGE PRESIDING OPINION

SHARPNACK, Senior Judge. Statement of the Case Curt Pearman, who as a landlord does business as Greenwood Professional Park, appeals from the trial court’s order granting partial summary judgment in favor of former tenants, T. Ryan Jackson and Kristin Jackson (the Jacksons), in his action against them alleging breach of a lease agreement by abandoning the leased pre

793 F.Supp. 293 (1992) Ariska SAVIOUR, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 90-2430-L. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 4, 1992. On Motion to Reconsider June 22, 1992. *294 Rosie M. Quinn, Rosie M. Quinn & Associates, Kansas City, Kan., for plaintiff.

GÓMEZ, Chief United States District Judge ORDER (June 14, 2013) Before the Court are the motions by Barbara Walters and Judith Kromenhoek to substitute deceased defendant Alfred Felice with his personal representative or successor in interest in Cowpet Bay West Condominium No. 27. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Barbara Walters (“Walte

703 F.Supp. 1455 (1988) Kenneth HARRIS and Charlotte Harris, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 87-2507-S. United States District Court, D. Kansas. December 9, 1988. *1456 Rosie M. Quinn, Rosie M. Quinn & Associates, Kansas City, Kan., for plaintiffs.

MEMORANDUM OPINION GÓMEZ, District Judge Before the Court are four motions for summary judgment filed by: Vincent Ver-diramo (‘Verdiramo”), Robert Cockayne (“Cockayne”), Lance Talkington (“Talking-ton”), the Cowpet Bay West Condominium Association (the “Association”), and the Board of the Cowpet Bay West Condominium Association (the “Board”) (collectively, the “Defendants”).

*456 MEMORANDUM OPINION GÓMEZ, District Judge. Before the Court are the claims alleged by Judith Kromenhoek against the deceased defendants, Alfred Felice (“Felice”) and Max Harcourt (“Harcourt”). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Judith Kromenhoek (“Kromenhoek”) owns a unit in the Cowpet Ba

*119OPINION OF THE COURT ATKINS, Senior District Judge. This appeal presents the question of whether NJ.Stat.Ann. § 17:28-1.4 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution. The statute limits the right of non-residents of New Jersey to sue for non-economic (pain and suffering) loss by automatically assigning the so called verbal

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SAFFELS, District Judge. This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration. On December 9, 1988, this court issued a Memorandum and Order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment in part. Plaintiffs now challenge several of the court’s conclusions in that Memorandum and Order. The court refers to its Memorandum and Order dated De

MEMORANDUM GUNN, District Judge. This is an action for monetary and injunctive relief brought by plaintiff Rosie E. Wakefield (“Wakefield”) against her present employer, defendant Monsanto Company (“Monsanto”). Wakefield, who is black, alleges that Monsanto intentionally discriminates against its black employees on the basis of race by providing them with lower pay, lower pay increases and less frequent p

MEMORANDUM OPINION GUNN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for a decision on the merits after a non-jury trial. The parties have filed proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. Based on the evidence and testimony presented at trial and the post-trial memoranda submitted, the Court now adopts this memorandum opinion as its findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.

JUSTICE McLAREN delivered the opinion of the court: The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting the motion of defendant, Rosie L. McGee, to suppress the results of a blood-alcohol test taken pursuant to section 11—501.6(a) of the Illinois Vehicle Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 95½, par. 11—501.6(a) (now 625 ILCS 5/11—501.6

435 A.2d 687 (1981) Thomas L. HUGHES, Mary M. Hughes, and Mildred A. Decker v. Richard HOLT and Charlotte M. Holt, Berkley & Veller Real Estate, Burlington Savings Bank, and Norman E. Wright. No. 287-79. Supreme Court of Vermont. July 15, 1981. Motion for Reargument Denied September 10, 1981. *688 McCarty &am;

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. After T & W Edmier Corp. completed its work on a reservoir in Deerfield, Illinois, it asked the Army Corps of Engineers for $32 million in addition to the agreed price of $11 million. It asserted that the extra $32 million was justified by the expense of removing hazardous materials. When the parties could not reach an agreemen

MISHLER, District Judge: Plaintiff-appellees instituted this diversity action in federal district court in June 1980. The amended complaint stated three claims for relief arising out of a course of dealings between the parties in connection with the now released motion picture entitled “VENOM”. Plaintiff Frank P. Rosenberg (“Rosenberg”) and defendant Martin T. Bregman (“Bregman”) at all relevant times h

NUMBER 13-20-00563-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE NETTIE BIVENS, ET AL. On Petition for Writ of Injunction. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion

6 F.3d 116 Rose DYSZEL and Robert Dyszel, h/w, Michele Dyszel andMichael Dyszel, h/w, Appellants,v.Rosie MARKS, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff,v.TIM'S AUTO SERVICE; Tim Doe, Third-Party Defendants,Michele Dyszel, Appellant.Daniel TUMOLO and Leslie Tumolo, h/w, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Andrew BROGAN, III, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 92-5289, 92-5334. United States C

Egan Jr., J. We affirm. Preliminarily, to the extent that Family Court’s bench decision and resulting orders do not fully comport with the requirements of CPLR 4213 (b), the rationale for the court’s determination nonetheless may be discerned and, in any event, the record before us is sufficiently developed to permit this Court to exercise its independent review power in this regard (see Matter of Cree v Terrance, 55

MEMORANDUM & ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction.179 II. Losses from an Unfilled Seat in House of Representatives.180 A. Categories of Critical Losses.181 1. Denial of Participation in Policymaking.:.181 2. Loss of Ombudsperson.181 3. Adv

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Harry D. Leinenweber, Judge United States District Court I. BACKGROUND Defendant Ditto Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”) is the parent of Defendant Ditto Trade, Inc. (“Trade”), and is a Broker-Dealer, registered with the Securities Exchange Commission (the -“SEC”). The Plaintiff, Paul Simons (“Simons”), is the former Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of Trad