Cases

475 P.2d 152 (1970) Geraldine ROSS, Plaintiff in Error, v. L.A. RUSSELL, d/b/a Russell Insurance Agency, Defendant in Error. No. 42109. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. September 29, 1970. *154 William H. Mattoon, Norman, for plaintiff in error. James H. Ballard, Purcell, for defendant in error.

11th Court of Appeals Eastland, Texas Memorandum Opinion Lauren Ro

Per Curiam. AFFIRMED. Rowe, Osterhaus, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam. AFFIRMED. Rowe, Osterhaus, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 17, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RUSSELL LENARD Appeal from the Criminal Court for McMinn Count 7 No. 23-CR-184, 24-CR-318 Andrew M. Freiberg, Judge FILED JAN No. E2024-00752-CCA-R3-CD Eine Rec'd by. The defendant, Russell Lenard, appeals the order of the trial court revoking his probation and ordering him to serve the remainder of his six-year sentence in confinement. Upon our review of the record and the

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed July 18, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00619-CV ROBERT L. MOODY, JR., Appellant V. IRWIN HERZ, JR., TRUSTEE OF THE THREE R TRUSTS; RUSSELL MOODY; FRANCES MOODY DAHLBERG; AND ROSS MOODY, Appellees On Appeal from the Probate

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

04/15/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON February 2, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RUSSELL WHEELER, JR. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 19-771 Kyle C. Atkins, Judge ___________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge. Plaintiff Chantel Russell brings this action against David Dupree, the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”),1 and State *48Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company in its capacity as plaintiffs uninsured motorist carrier (“State Farm”) for injuries that she al

TREVOR N. McFADDEN, U.S.D.J. The Endangered Species Act consultation process ensures that federal agencies take no action that would jeopardize the continued existence of endangered or threatened species or adversely affect critical habitat. The Act also grants certain rights for "applicants" to participate in this process. This case is about whether the National Marine Fisheries Service wrongly denied the American Tunaboat Associat

Thaxter, J. We are concerned here with two actions, one by a minor child of the age of eight years brought by her father as next friend to recover for personal injuries, the other brought by the father to recover for medical expenses. In each case at the close of the evidence the presiding justice on the defendant’s motion directed a verdict for the defendant. The cases are now before us on exceptions to these rulings.

LEE, C.J., for the Court: FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 1. Daniel Zachary Ross, along with three other men, were indicted for armed robbery and conspiracy to commit armed robbery. The four men were accused of taking a man’s wallet in Lee County, Mississippi, after displaying a .38-caliber revolver to him. ¶2. Ross pleaded guilty to armed robbery, and in exchange, the c

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs' and Defendants' cross motions for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos. 70, 78. In this action, Plaintiffs Pacific Choice Seafood Company, Sea Princess, LLC, and Pacific Fishing, LLC challenge certain provisions of a federal fisheries management program that establishes an individual fishing quota program (the "IFQ Program"). For the reasons detail

MELANSON, Chief Judge Eric Michael Ross appeals from his judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm and trafficking in methamphetamine. Specifically, Ross challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the order denying the motion to suppress, vacate the judgment of conviction, and remand.

OPINION RODENBERG, Judge. In this personal-injury appeal, appellant-defendant argues that the district court erred in determining that underinsured-motorist (UIM) benefits paid to respondent-plaintiff prior to trial in the direct action do not constitute a collateral source that reduces the award of damages under Minn.Stat. § 548.251. We hold in this case of first impression that, under the plain language

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge. The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) brought this case under Sections 5(a) and *37413(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a) and 53(b), against a group of corporate entities and individuals for alleged deceptive conduct in connection with the sale of s

217 P.3d 997 (2009) Daniel RUSSELL, a Minor, by and Through His Next Friend, Gary RUSSELL; Gary Russell; and Marcella Russell, Appellants, v. Brian BRADEN, a Minor, by and Through His Next Friend and Mother, Shara FARRAN-FLAHERTY; Shara Farran-Flaherty; and Larry Flaherty; et al., Defendants, Chris Braden, Appellee. No. 101,100. Court of Appeals of Kansas. October 9, 2009.

SILBERMAN, Judge. Roxanne Ross (the Mother) challenges the trial court’s visitation orders of February 13, 2004, and June 7, 2004, granting visitation with the parties’ minor child to Robert T. Phillips (the Father). Because the trial court erred as a matter of law in applying the standard for an initial visitation determination rather than the standard for a modification of visitation, we reverse and remand for further procee

Chief Justice TOAL. Brian P. Menezes (Petitioner) argues that the court of appeals erred in its analysis of when a claim for breach of fiduciary duty accrues under Delaware law. We disagree. The court of appeals performed a knowledgeable and perceptive analysis of the instant case. However, our review of Delaware law leads us to a different conclusion regarding the efficacy of Petitioner’s claim. Thus, we affirm the court of

591 F.Supp.2d 48 (2008) Phillip Edgar ROSS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, and Marjorie F. Canby, Defendants. Civil Action No. 04-1286 (RBW). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 23, 2008. *49 Howard L. Blau, Blau & Barrows, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Beverly Maria Russell, U.S. Attorney's Offic