Cases

*397Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court. In the latest chapter of this long-litigated original-jurisdiction ease, the Queehan Tribe (Tribe) and the United States on the Tribe’s behalf assert claims for increased rights to water from the Colorado River. These claims are based on the contentio

MEMORANDUM OPINION Thomas F. Hogan, Senior United States District Judge Although it is a grievous axiom of American history that the Cherokee Nation’s narrative is steeped in sorrow as a result of United States governmental policies that marginalized Native American Indians and removed them from their- lands,

634 F.Supp.2d 1045 (2007) NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.; Sierra Club; and Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; and Jack Troyer, in his official capacity as Regional Forester, Intermountain Region, Defendants. No. S-05-02590WBS GGH. United States District Court, E.D. California. September 5, 2007.

MEMORANDUM, ORDER, & JUDGMENT JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction..............................................................168 II. Facts........................ 170 A. Procedural History....................................................170 B. Evidence on Poker..................

531 U.S. 1121 S.Ct. 292148 L.Ed.2d 1 STATE OF ARIZONA, COMPLAINANTv.STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al. BILL OF COMPLAINT No. 8 Orig. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Argued April 25, 2000 Decided June 19, 2000 Supplemental Decree October 10, 2000 ON EXCEPTIONS TO REPORT OF SP

463 U.S. 110 (1983) NEVADA v. UNITED STATES ET AL. No. 81-2245. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 27, 1983 Decided June 24, 1983[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT *112 E. Barrett Prettyman, Special Deputy Attorney General of Nevada, argued the c

425 F.Supp.2d 1321 (2006) CANADIAN LUMBER TRADE ALLIANCE; Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc.; Canadian Wheat Board; Ontario Forest Indus. Ass'n; Ontario Lumber Mfgs Ass'n; the Free Trade Lumber Council; and the Government of Canada, Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES of America; Deborah J. Spero, Acting Commissioner, United States Customs & Border Protection; and United States Customs & Border Protection, Defendants, and Coalition for Fair Lumber

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion and Supporting Brief to Determine That This Matter Proceed as a Class Action, filed January 6, 2014 (Doe. 194)(“Motion”). The Court held a two-part class certification hearing with its first portion on March 10,11, and 12, 2014, and its second portion on April 3 and 4, 2014.

*751Justice HECHT delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice O’NEILL, Justice WAINWRIGHT, Justice MEDINA, Justice GREEN, and Justice JOHNSON joined. Once again this Court is called upon to determine whether the funding of Texas public schools violates the Texas Constitution.1

251 F.Supp.2d 176 (2003) Senator Mitch McCONNELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. National Rifle Association of America, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants. Emily Echols, a minor child, by and through her next friends, Tim and Windy Echols, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants. Chamber of Commerce of the United

611 F.Supp. 1130 (1985) TOSCO CORPORATION and Energy Resources Technology Land, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Donald P. HODEL, Secretary of the Interior, Defendant, Joseph B. UMPLEBY, and Wasatch Development Co., Plaintiffs, v. Donald P. HODEL, Secretary of the Interior, Defendant, Barnette T. NAPIER, Grace A. Savage, Joan L. Savage, Maude B. Farnum, St. Clair Napier Castlin, William H. Farnum, Jr., John R. Farnum, John W. Savage, and Neil

ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3

ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

The plaintiff prays for a writ of mandate against the defendant, as county clerk of Lake County, to compel the said defendant, as such clerk, to register plaintiff as an elector of Scotts Valley precinct in Lake County. A demurrer and answer were filed to the petition, but the case has been submitted upon a stipulation between the parties in which all of the facts are stated bearing upon the case, and it is unnecessary to refer to the pleadings further. Section 1 of article 11 o