⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Roy Lee Unger”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-01-19 · Published · cited 178× · 845 F.3d 1279; 2017 D.A.R. 533; 91 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 768; 2017 WL 218027; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 956
OPINION IKUTA, Circuit Judge: Daniel Norcia filed a class action complaint against Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., (collectively, “Samsung”), alleging that Samsung made misrepresentations as to the performance of the Galaxy S4 phone. Samsung moved to compel arbitration of the dispute on the ground that a
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2015-03-02 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 02-15-00069-CV SECOND COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 3/2/2015 6:50:39 PM
California Supreme Court · 1984-12-27 · Published · cited 34× · 692 P.2d 238; 37 Cal. 3d 612; 209 Cal. Rptr. 474; 1984 Cal. LEXIS 140
(1c), (2b) I am sympathetic to the views expressed in Justice Sims' scholarly opinion. The prospect of *Page 621 political parties participating directly in elections for judicial office through endorsement is not appealing, and I agree that article II is amenable to an interpretation that would prohibit such conduct. Indeed, were it not for First Amendment considerations, I would be inclined to join in Justice Sims' dissent. It i
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2004-05-20 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued May 20, 2004 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas</
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2002-07-24 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued July 24, 2002 In The Court of Appeals For The
District Court, S.D. New York · 1989-06-19 · Published · cited 14× · 125 F.R.D. 602; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6742; 1989 WL 67036
BARBARA A. LEE, United States Magistrate. This is an action for securities fraud by a Swiss financial institution against a broker/dealer and two of its employees, pursuant to §§ 10(b) and 15(c)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”), 15 *604U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78o(c)(l); Rules 10b-5 and 15cl-5 thereunder, 17 C.F.R. §§ 240.-10b-5, 240.15cl-5; and § 1
Martinez v. Bushpublic domain
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2002-12-03 · Published · cited 14× · 234 F. Supp. 2d 1275; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23448; 2002 WL 31740366
234 F.Supp.2d 1275 (2002) Honorable Mayor Raul L. MARTINEZ, Bishop Victor T. Curry, Hattie D. Harden, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, Inc., Robert Pope, James O. Brown, State Senator Betty Holzendorf, Dr. Carl Warren, State Representative Denise Lee, State Representative Gary Siplin, State Representative Matthew Meadows, State Representative, Dorothy Bendross-Mindingall, Rev. Richard P. Dunn, III, Enid Pinkney, Jacqui Colyer, Alexander Ke
Smith v. M. ST. VILpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000-02-09 · Published · cited 2× · 765 So. 2d 60; 2000 WL 140311
765 So.2d 60 (2000) Lee Roy SMITH, Petitioner, v. Pierre M. ST. VIL, Transportation Casualty Insurance Company, and Earlston Roberts, Respondents. No. 4D99-1340. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. February 9, 2000. Lee Roy Smith, Edgefield, South Carolina, pro se. No response required for respondents. PER CURIAM. Petitioner fi
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006-10-31 · Published · cited 0× · 149 P.3d 1099; 2006 OK CIV APP 148; 2006 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 132; 2006 WL 3627755
Opinion by DOUG GABBARD II, Presiding Judge. 1 1 Plaintiffs, Windle Lee Fuchs and Anna O. Radgowski Harlow, appeal the trial court's dismissal of their wrongful death/products liability lawsuit against Defendants, Fleetwood Homes of Texas, Kidde Fyrnetics, and Maxey Mobile Homes. The trial court held that Plaintiffs' lawsuit was time-barred. We affirm. FACTS T 2 On Se
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994-10-25 · Published · cited 15× · 885 S.W.2d 50; 1994 WL 579984
885 S.W.2d 50 (1994) Ronald T. CHINNERY (Respondent), v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, State of Missouri (Appellant). No. WD 48997. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. October 25, 1994. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A. Chenault, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept. of Revenue, Jefferson City, for appellant. Elizabeth Unger Carlyle, Lee's Summit,
District Court, S.D. New York · 1985-07-23 · Published · cited 7× · 613 F. Supp. 1134
613 F.Supp. 1134 (1985) UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANIES, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Philip TURNER, Hoffman, Kavanaugh Securities Corporation and Lon Roy Kavanaugh, Jr., Third-Party Defendants. No. 81 Civ. 5605(MEL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 23, 1985.
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006-08-21 · Published · cited 8× · 852 N.E.2d 971; 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 1661; 2006 WL 2393278
852 N.E.2d 971 (2006) Max PINKOWSKI and Edward Bernstein d/b/a E & M Realty and Eleanor Pinkowski, Appellants-Defendants, v. CALUMET TOWNSHIP OF LAKE COUNTY, Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 45A04-0601-CV-13. Court of Appeals of Indiana. August 21, 2006. *972 David Paul Allen, Hammond, IN, Attorney for Appellants. Dock
Byers v. Pattersonpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2007-03-14 · Published · cited 26× · 219 S.W.3d 514; 165 Oil & Gas Rep. 1009; 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 1963; 2007 WL 757813
219 S.W.3d 514 (2007) Lewie BYERS and Forrest Williams, Appellants, v. Jerry PATTERSON, Commissioner of the General Land Office, Texas General Land Office, Chevron USA, Inc., Goldston Oil Corp., Samson Lone Star Limited Partnership, Oxy USA, Inc., Jack Phillips, Gail Mizer, Lee Wallace, Virginia Wallace, Harold Neff & Associates, Inc., Dorice Baker, Bank of America, N.A., Henry Bell, John Allen Bell, Maryhelen Boice, J.R. Brewer, W.M. Burney,
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-06-27 · Published · cited 0×
Dismiss and Opinion Filed June 27, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01140-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND-DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LARRY
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013-08-06 · Published · cited 3× · 228 N.C. App. 520; 2013 WL 3989949
CALABRIA, Judge. Defendants appeal from multiple orders and judgments entered by the trial court in favor of plaintiffs on claims involving the restrictive covenants governing the Gull Harbor subdivision (“Gull Harbor”). We affirm in part, reverse in part, vacate in part, and remand. I. Factual and Procedural Background On 11 April 1972, developer Walton W. Smith (“Smith”) acquired a large
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-10-07 · Published · cited 0×
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 7, 2013. Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00893-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LAR
Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996-06-27 · Published · cited 10× · 921 P.2d 84
921 P.2d 84 (1996) The FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., a Wisconsin Nonprofit Corporation; The Colorado Chapter of the Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc.; Glenn V. Smith; Lora J. Attwood; Robert A. Attwood; Jeff Baysinger; Robert H. Fenn; and Lee Whitfield, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Roy ROMER, Governor of the State of Colorado; Gale Norton, Attorney General of the State of Colorado; Gail Schoettler, Treasurer of the State of Colorado;
Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996-06-27 · Published · cited 184× · 921 P.2d 84; 20 Brief Times Rptr. 1044; 1996 Colo. App. LEXIS 202; 1996 WL 351085
Opinion by Judge DAVIDSON. In this action for a permanent injunction, declaratory judgment, and damages for actions taken by state, City & County of Denver, and Arapahoe County officials (officials), The Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc., and six individual plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the trial court dismissing their complaint pursuant to C.R.C.P. 12(b). We affirm. Plaintif
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012-07-31 · Published · cited 2× · 884 F. Supp. 2d 717; 34 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 252; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107616; 2012 WL 3138097
OPINION AND ORDER JAMES T. MOODY, District Judge. Plaintiffs and counter-defendants William Bodemer and Innovative Beverage Inc. have moved for summary judgment on their complaint for a declaratory judgment and on defendant and counter-claimant *721Swanel Beverage, Inc’s (hereinafter “Swanel”) counterclaims. (DE # 34.) For the reasons se