Cases

HONORABLE STEVE C. JONES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter appears before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order/Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. [2] ). I. BACKGROUND In their Motion, Plaintiffs state that they seek emergency relief to allow them to exercise their First Amendment rights in the public areas of Capitol Square property, which includes t

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT RUBIN YOUNG, Appellant, v. DR. BRENDA C. SNIPES, BROWARD COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTION'S CANVASSING BOARD, and MARK BOGEN, candidate, Appellees. No. 4D18-2221 [February 14, 2019] Appeal from the Circuit Court f

Affirmed.

Affirmed.

Petition for rehearing denied.

23 S.W.3d 382 (2000) In re Michael RUBIN, Mannie Rubin, Paula Eilbott, Beth Lipson, and Miriam Emmer, Trustee of Miriam Emmer Trust, Relators, v. The Honorable Ron ENNS, Respondent. No. 07-99-0385-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. January 7, 2000. *383 Hicks, Thomas & Lilienstern, Jody Sheets, D. Clay Holcomb, Amarillo

190 F.Supp.2d 541 (2002) Jeffrey RUBIN, Ph.D., Plaintiff, v. CORNING-PAINTED POST, et al., Defendants. No. 01-CV-6526L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. January 14, 2002. Ronald Benjamin, Binghamton, NY, for Plaintiff. James F. Young, Sayles, Evans, Brayton, Palmer & Tifft, Elmira, NY, for Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER<

Shea, J. The Appellate Court upheld the judgment of the trial court, in an action for dissolution of marriage, ordering the plaintiff husband to pay to the defendant wife a share of the assets he may acquire under his mother’s will and on termination of a revocable inter vivos trust created by her. Rubin v. Rubin, 7 Conn. App. 735, 510 A.2d 1000 (1986). This court granted the plaintiff’s petition for certificati

Hull, J. This case raises the question whether, in a dissolution action, the awarding to one spouse of a share of the assets which the other spouse may acquire in the future under his mother’s will and on termination of an inter vivos trust, runs afoul of the rule of Krause v. Krause, 174 Conn. 361, 387 A.2d 548 (1978). That case held that testimony concerning the potential inheritance of a spouse is speculative

Dismissed.

MEMORANDUM OPINION SLEET, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff, Frank E. Acierno (“Acierno”) owns a parcel of land near the Christiana Mall in New Castle County, Delaware. The defendant, Preit-Rubin, a Pennsylvania corporation and a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), assisted in the development of land adjacent to Acierno’s property. In April of 1999, Acierno file

99 F.3d 1157 Rubin Young, B.O.L.D., Presidentv.Donna Shalala, Henry Cisneros, HUD Secretary NO. 95-4781 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Oct 09, 1996 S.D.Fla., 95 F.3d 58 1 DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC. <

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated March 26, 2004, the plaintiff mother appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ross, J.), dated May 25, 2010, which, after a hearing, in effect, granted that branch of the motion of the defendant father which was to hold her in civil contempt for her willful violation of the custody and visitation provisions in the parties’ stipulation of settlement, which was in

OPINION AMBRO, Circuit Judge. Jacqueline Young appeals the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in *306favor of her former employer, Temple University Hospital, on her claims for hostile work environment, constructive discharge, and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act.

586 F.3d 201 (2009) Andrew YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 08-5847-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: September 9, 2009. Decided: November 12, 2009. *202 Jennifer B. Rubin, John M. Delehanty, and Andrew Nathanson, Mintz, Levin, Coh

43 P.3d 1018 (2002) Anna RUBIN, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. No. 36631. Supreme Court of Nevada. April 12, 2002. *1019 Patti & Sgro, Las Vegas, for Appellant. Christian & Petersen, Las Vegas; Lewis & Roca and James E. Berchtold and Von S. Heinz, Las Vegas; Pearson, P

OPINION AMBRO, Circuit Judge. Jacqueline Young appeals the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in *306favor of her former employer, Temple University Hospital, on her claims for hostile work environment, constructive discharge, and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act.

Opinion RAYE, P. J. Raising an important issue of first impression, customers 1 of Woods Irrigation Company (Woods), a water distribution corporation, contend the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Board) lacks jurisdiction to issue a cease-and-desist order (CDO) for an illegal diversion of wa

24-2018-cv Moore et al. v. Rubin UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2024 (Argued: April 8, 2025 Decided: November 21, 2025) Docket No. 24-2018-cv AMY MOORE, MIA LYTELL, NATASHA TAGAI, EMMA HOPPER, BRITTANY HASSEN, BRITTANY REYES,

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge, dissenting hi disagree with the majority’s affir-mance of Defendant’s jury conviction on very scant circumstantial evidence. I simply do not think the circumstantial evidence excluded every other reasonable hypothesis. The State provided no evidence which could actually place Defendant at the crime scene beyond a reasonable doubt. The only witness to state the vict