Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Rudder v. Department of Education”
Thomas v. New York City Department of Educationpublic domain
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lynn R. Kotler, J.), entered April 15, 2016, which granted defendants-respondents’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs. In this taxpayer action, plaintiff Michael P. Thomas, alleges, among other things, that defendant Department of Education (DOE) and defendant Chancellor Farina engaged in fraudu
Rudder v. District of Columbiapublic domain
890 F.Supp. 23 (1995) Beatrice RUDDER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. Civ. No. 92-2881 (CRR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 26, 1995. *24 *25 *26 *27 Leroy T. Jenkins,
Rudder v. Patakipublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT White, J. On November 30, 1995, one month prior to the scheduled sunset of the regulatory review agency formerly known as the Office of Regulatory and Management Assistance, defendant Governor issued Executive Order No. 20 (9 NYCRR 5.20 [hereinafter the executive order]) which established the position of Director of Regulatory Reform (hereinafter the Director) with the authority to ov
Litaker v. Hoover Board of Educationpublic domain
*1271MEMORANDUM OPINION . MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Robin Litaker worked for the Hoover Board of Education for 21 years. The Hoover Board selected Ms. Litaker as the principal of Trace Crossings Elementary School in 2010. Ms. Litaker received favorable ratings for her first two years at Trace Crossings, and th
Alabama Department of Corrections v. Merrittpublic domain
On Application for Rehearing PER CURIAM. The opinion of June 18, 2010, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor. The Alabama Department of Corrections (“the department”); Richard Allen, commissioner of the Department of Corrections; Governor Bob Riley; Mr. Carter,1 director of the Mobile Work Release Center; and Mr. Reynolds,2<
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-25-00170-CV LEVI RUDDER, APPELLANT V. CURTIS PARRISH, COUNTY JUDGE OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; TEXAS SUPREME COURT, THROUGH NATHAN L. HECHT, AS CHIEF JUSTICE; UNKNOWN NUMBER OF JOHN AND JANE DOES, APPELLEES
DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge: This case concerns how the New York State Department of Correctional Ser *129 vices 1 (“DOCS”) determines when an inmate receives temporary medical leave from prison for the treatment of mental illness.
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge. Pending before the Court is a facial constitutional challenge to 26 U.S.C. § 5000A, which is the requirement to maintain minimum essential insurance coverage contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended. The plaintiff, Matthew Sissel, complains that this minimum cove
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge PILLARD. PILLARD, Circuit Judge: These consolidated cases present the question whether a regulatory accommodation for religious nonprofit organizations that permits them to opt out of the contraceptive coverage requirement under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”), 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-13(a)(4), i
Monahan v. New York City Department Of Correctionspublic domain
214 F.3d 275 (2nd Cir. 2000) DANIEL MONAHAN, EVELYN S. RODRIGUEZ, CECILIA LORDE, LUIS ALMODOVAR, FRED SILVA, THOMAS BASIL, ROBERT NETELL, DANIEL FOYNES, HARVEY BALL, DANIEL APONTE, GARY NARDIELLO, VINCENT REBECCA, ORAL BECKFORD, ALICE BRESLOFF, IRWIN COHEN, JOSE CUEVAS, DENNIS DENIRO, INGRID GRIFFIN, DENNISSE ILARRAZA, THEODORE ISRAEL, SABRINA KEYES-ALSTON, JULIE KNOWLES, TANYA MANN, MICHAEL MESSINA, JOHN MICKEL, NZINGHA MOSES, NOAH N
Monahan v. New York City Department of Correctionspublic domain
MORAN, Senior District Judge. Plaintiffs-appellants are current and former New York City correction officers and captains. They appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Rakoff, J.) dismissing with prejudice their consolidated challenge to the sick leave policy of the New York City Department of Correction (“DOC”). Embodied in DOC Directive 2262, the policy permits an eligible office
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) DARYAO S. KHATRI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 19-2644 (RBW) ) BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE ) UNIVERSITY OF THE DIS
OPINION and ORDER MORGAN, District Judge. Defendants the city of Norfolk and the Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority have filed a motion to dismiss all counts of Plaintiff’s complaint. For the reasons outlined below, the Court GRANTS their motions and dismisses counts I, II, III, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX with prejudice and dismisses count IV without prejudice. The Court announced its ruling
Matter of People of the State of New York v Schofield (2021 NY Slip Op 04785) Matter of People of the State of New York v Schofield 2021 NY Slip Op 04785 Decided on August 26, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department P
Mpoy v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRUNO K. MPOY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 22-2501 (BAH) ) Judge Beryl A. Howell
Matter of New York State Bd. of Regents v State Univ. of N.Y. (2019 NY Slip Op 07458) Matter of New York State Bd. of Regents v State Univ. of N.Y. 2019 NY Slip Op 07458 Decided on October 17, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge The plaintiff, Nancy Shinabargar, proceeding pro se, brings this lawsuit against the Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia (“UDC”), where the plaintiff formerly attended law school, and ten UDC employees, including the Dean and Associate Dean of the Law School, five professors, the Director of Public Safety, w
Matter of Real Estate Bd. of N.Y., Inc. v City of New York (2018 NY Slip Op 05906) Matter of Real Estate Bd. of N.Y., Inc. v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 05906 Decided on August 23, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department
Matter of Real Estate Bd. of N.Y., Inc. v City of New York (2018 NY Slip Op 05906) Matter of Real Estate Bd. of N.Y., Inc. v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 05906 Decided on August 23, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department
WINCHESTER BOAT CLUB, INC. vs. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF WINCHESTER, MISC 17-000204 WINCHESTER BOAT CLUB, INC., Plaintiff, v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF WINCHESTER MISC 17-000204 APRIL 29, 2021 MIDDLESEX, ss. FOSTER, J. DECISION With: MISC 17-000272 : WINCHESTER BOAT CLUB, INC., Plai