Cases

512 F.Supp.2d 853 (2007) Sandra VEGA, Martha Vega, Maria Lopez, Luis Lopez, and Monica Moreno, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Guadalupe Rodriguez, Deceased, Plaintiff's, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. EP-05-CV-420-KC. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division. April 5, 2007. *854

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RUDY RIVERA, No. 20-15651 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:17-cv-02776- JCM-NJK CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION

ELY, Circuit Judge: Appellant was convicted in a jury trial of the violation of Section 176a of Title 21, United States Code. At the date of his conviction he was under twenty years of age, and upon the denial of his motion for new trial, he was sentenced under the provisions of the Federal Youth Corrections Act. 18 U.S.C. §§ 5005-502

PER CURIAM: In a non jury trial, Notaro was convicted of having unlawfully sold approximately three and one-half ounces of marijuana. 21 U.S.C. § 176a. He had previously been found guilty by a jury, but we were compelled to set aside the judgment of conviction which followed that finding. Notaro v. United St

MEMORANDUM *** Oscar Rudy Sandoval, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for cancellation of removal, asylum and withholding of removal. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the IJ’s order as the final agency determi

MEMORANDUM ** The parties’ joint motion for summary reversal and remand is granted, and defendant’s sentence is vacated. See United States v. Vidal, 504 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc). This appeal is remanded to the district court for the purpose of re-sentencing defendant. VACATED and REMANDED. This disposition is n

ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING CLASS CERTIFICATION JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (DE 3198) (the “Motion”). The Court has carefully considered the Motion, response, reply, supplemental memoranda, and the documents attached to them, as well as the parties’ voluminous evidentiary su

ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING CLASS CERTIFICATION JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Incorporated Memorandum of Law, (DE 3262) (the “Motion”). The Court has carefully considered the Motion, response, reply, supplemental memoranda, and the documents attached to them, as well as the parties’ voluminous evidentiary submi

OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Defendants Gary Yasuda and Amarillo College of Hairdressing appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. The district court found that the defendants waived their right to arbi *1120 tration by their litigati

107 Ill. App.3d 289 (1982) 437 N.E.2d 919 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RAUL VEGA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 81-106. Illinois Appellate Court — Second District. Opinion filed June 30, 1982. *290 Mary Robinson and Manuel Serritos, both of State Appellate Defender's Office, of El

346 F.Supp.2d 567 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, v. Gustavo RAMOS, Amado Rudy Feliz-Ramirez, a/k/a "Cable," Carlos Ramos-Valenzuela, Jorge Omar Garcia-Martinez, Juan Ramos-Breach, Jorge Hernandez, Carlos Breach-Vega, Jesus Vaca-Acosta, a/k/a "Chaco," Danillo Paredes-Silva, a/k/a "Dadao," Polman Tavares, a/k/a "Harry," Adalberto Ortiz, a/k/a "Capu," Cesar Santana, a/k/a "Sandy," a/k/a "Raton," and Martin Aldez-Solis, Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Huntington Bancshares Incorporated and Huntington National Bank’s (collectively “Huntington”) Motion to Compel Arbitration (DE #202) filed December 15, 2009. On February 5, 2010, Plaintiff Responded (DE # 272) and on February 24, 2010, Defendant Replied (DE # 293). Coordina

ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge: This is the consolidated appeal of five individuals who, based upon their involvement in what was dubbed the “Miami River Cops Case”, were convicted of various offenses under the federal racketeering, narcotics, civil rights and tax laws. On appeal, they raise numerous arguments challenging their convictions or sentences.

SUMMARY ORDER Defendants-Appellants each pleaded guilty to participation in a common conspiracy to distribute cocaine, and were sentenced in separate proceedings in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Marrero, J.'). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts of these cases, their procedural histories, and the issues on appeal. We review a district court’s sentencing

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA AEROGROW INTERNATIONAL, INC.; No. 83835 CHRIS HAGEDORN; CORY MILLER; PATRICIA M. ZIEGLER; H. MACGREGOR CLARKE; DAVID B. KENT; SMG GROWING MEDIA, INC.; rm, AGI ACQUISITION SUB, INC.; THE i F fe i} SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO COMPANY; : JAMES HAGEDORN; AND PETER JUN 30 2022 SUPRON, | ELIZABETH A. BROWN Petitioners CLERK OF SUPREME COURT , BY -Yo. VS. DEPUTY CLERK THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND TH

GRIMES, Acting P. J. *856*498M.M. appeals the appointment of a conservator under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (LPS) ( Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5000 et seq. ) after a jury found him to be gravely disabled due to a mental disorder. He does not challenge t

HAGEN, Judge: ¶1 Defendant Jordan Jeffery Jack was convicted of seven counts of exploitation of a vulnerable adult, third degree felonies, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-111 (LexisNexis 2012), and one count of communications fraud, a s

OPINION SANCTIONING ATTORNEY ANTHONY J. DELUCA FOR FAILING TO REPRESENT WAYNE A. SEARE IN THIS ADVERSARY PROCEEDING1 BRUCE A. MARKELL, Bankruptcy Judge. I. INTRODUCTION.170 II. DETAILED FACTS.171 A. The St. Rose Litigation.171 B. The Garnishment.171 C. The Initial Consultation.171 D. The Bankruptcy Case is

ORDER GRANTING CLASS CERTIFICATION JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (DE # 1387) (“Motion”).1 The Court has carefully considered the Motion, response, reply, and the documents attached to them, as well as Plaintiffs’ voluminous evidentiary submissio

STEVE KIM, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendant-Counterclaimant Enterprise Services LLC (ES) moves to compel more *1134deposition testimony from Mitchell Evans, both personally and as the representative for DME Products and Systems, Inc. (DME). As the target of a federal criminal investigation, Evans has asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege ag