Cases

FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER, Judge. |2Pefendant, Quvadirs Ruffin, appeals his convictions arising from events which occurred in the early morning hours of May 28, 2011. In this appeal, defendant argues the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and that the trial court erred by excluding evidence of a “CODIS” match from trial. For the following reasons, we affirm defendant’s convictions and sentences.

943 A.2d 1105 (2008) 106 Conn.App. 396 Marcellus RUFFIN v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION. No. 28287. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Submitted on Briefs January 4, 2008. Decided March 18, 2008. Mary H. Trainer, special public defender, filed a brief for the appellant (petitioner). David I. Cohen, state's attorney, Robert

Simmons, et al. v. The Maryland Management Company, et. al., No. 1680, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Eyler, Deborah S., J. MARYLAND CONSUMER DEBT COLLECTION ACT (MCDCA) § 14-202(8) DEBT COLLECTION BY ENFORCING RIGHT WITH KNOWLEDGE RIGHT DOES NOT EXIST - - MARYLAND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT (MCPA) §§ 13-301(14)(iii) and 13-303(5) MISREPRESENTATION IN DEBT COLLECTION - - REAL PROPERTY § 8-208(d) PROHIBITION AGAINST ANTI-WAIVER PROVISIONS IN RESIDENTIAL LEASES - - COURTS AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

KELLER, J. The plaintiff, Sherri Ruffin, brings the present action against four defendants. The first, and named defendant, is the department of public works (public works). The second defendant is the department of administrative services (administrative services). The third is an administrative services manager, Keith Anderson, and the fourth and final defendant is William R. Andrews, a public works human resources administrato

The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Kim L. Cramer, and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Kim L. Cramer, with modifications.

JUSTICE COMPTON delivered the opinion of the Court. The question presented in this unlawful detainer action is whether the trial court erred in finding that the lessee had been constructively evicted from the demised premises. Appellant C. G. II L.C., trading as North Ridge Apartments, t

Jun 30 2015, 8:19 am ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES Swaray Edward Conteh Craig M. Borowski The Law Office of Swaray Conteh, LLC Rozlyn M. Fulgoni-Britton Indianapolis, Indiana Faegre Baker Daniels LLP

ORDER TERENCE T. EVANS, Chief Judge. In a decision released on June 29, 1993, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ordered that Andre Ruffin be resentenced. United States v. Ruffin, 997 F.2d 343 (7th Cir.1993). When I originally sentenced Mr. Ruffin, on January 29,1992,1 ordered a total term of 27 years. I imposed the sentence, which admittedly

640 S.E.2d 620 (2006) AMBLING MANAGEMENT COMPANY v. PURDY. Purdy v. Ambling Management Company. Nos. A06A1409, A06A1410. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 28, 2006. Reconsideration Denied December 15, 2006. *622 Fields, Howell, Athans & McLaughlin, Michael J. Athans, Gregory O. Shenton, Atlant

261 F.Supp.2d 644 (2003) NATIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOC., et al. Plaintiffs v. PINE BELT SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY, et al. Defendants. No. CIV.A.2:02 CV 723 GU. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Hattiesburg Division. April 23, 2003. *645 John G. Corlew, Virginia T. Munford, Watkins & Eager, Jackson

424 So.2d 1192 (1982) Annette RUFFIN v. TRAPP CHEVROLET INCORPORATED and Bellefonte Insurance Company. No. 82 CA 0333. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. December 21, 1982. Lawrence Arcell, New Orleans, for plaintiff and appellant. Burt K. Carnahan, Metairie, for defendants and appellees. Before LOTTINGER, COLE and CARTER, JJ. LOTTINGE

KENNEY, J. October 26, 2015 Medical Management and Rehabilitation Services, Inc., and its owner, Carolyn Miller (collectively “MMARS”), challenge the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene’s (“the Department’s”) award of a case management contract to The Coordinating Center (“TCC”). The Circuit Court for Talbot County grante

WYATT, District Judge (dissenting): Respectfully and with regret, I dissent from the decision expressed in Judge Mansfield’s thoughtful opinion. The evidence is more than sufficient to show that Ruffin committed a big fraud and that he should be punished. I do not believe, however, that he can properly be punished in a federal court by conviction for a violation as a principal of 42 U.S.C. § 2971f(a) (formerly 4

437 A.2d 1120 (1981) A. MAZZETTI & SONS, INC., Defendant Below, Appellant, v. Joseph RUFFIN and First State Masonry, Inc., Claimant and Defendant Below, Appellees. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted September 18, 1981. Decided November 18, 1981. B. Wilson Redfearn and Colin M. Shalk (argued) of Tybout, Redfearn, Casarino & Pell, Wilmington, for defendant-a

McMurray, Presiding Judge. As Salomen Santana, Juan Santillan and Hector Berrios (“the painters”) were painting an apartment building owned by Sherwood Associates, a Limited Partnership, and Sherwood Apartments, Inc. (“the owners”), they were injured by high-voltage electricity from Georgia Power Company’s (“Georgia Power”) overhead power cable. The incident occurred while the painters were raising an extension ladder to the

486 S.E.2d 30 (1997) 225 Ga. App. 818 McLANE v. ATLANTA MARKET CENTER MANAGEMENT COMPANY et al. No. A96A1685. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 5, 1997. Reconsideration Denied April 1, 1997. Reconsideration Denied September 18, 1997. *31 James L. Ford, Sr., Terry D. Jacks

473 S.E.2d 218 (1996) 222 Ga. App. 1 BISHOP v. KFC NATIONAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC. No. A96A0733. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 27, 1996. *219 McKenney, Jordan & Carey, G. McGregor Jordan, Jr., Macon, for appellant. Fain, Major & Wiley, Thomas E. Brennan, John K. Miles, Jr., Atlanta, fo

THIS DISPOSITION IS CITABLE AS PRECEDENT 8/20/02 OF THE TTAB Paper No. 11 GDH/gdh UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ________ In re Ruffin Gaming, LLC ________ Seria

690 F.Supp. 234 (1988) Gus BEVONA, on Behalf of the TRUSTEES OF the BUILDING SERVICE 32B-32J PENSION FUND, Plaintiff, v. GALBREATH-RUFFIN CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. 83 Civ. 7913 (JES). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 8, 1988. *235 Manning, Raab, Dealy & Sturm, New York City, for plaintiff, William

286 S.W.2d 743 (1956) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ralph Strickland RUFFIN, Appellant. No. 44755. Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1. February 13, 1956. *745 Charles M. Shaw, Clayton, for appellant. John M. Dalton, Atty. Gen., Donal D. Guffey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent. HOLLINGSWORTH, Judge. <