⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

8 opinions for “Rupp v. Higgs”

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004-09-08 · Published · cited 222× · 382 F.3d 1206; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18957; 2004 WL 2000065
TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge. On May 31, 1921, and following into the next day, violent attacks destroyed the African-American community of Greenwood, Oklahoma. An angry white mob converged on Greenwood in a devastating assault, burning homes and businesses, killing up to three hundred people, and leaving thousands homeless. In February 2003, Plaintiffs-Appellants, all Riot survivors or descendants of survivors, filed suit a
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007-04-16 · Published · cited 0× · 482 F.3d 1220
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge. I Introduction Plaintiff/appellant Deborah Meyer was involuntarily committed over a weekend to Oklahoma’s Western State Psychiatric Center, an in-patient facility for treatment of the mentally ill and a part of the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health. Ms. Meyer brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, with pendent state law claims, against vari
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007-04-16 · Published · cited 59× · 482 F.3d 1232
482 F.3d 1232 Deborah S. MEYER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF HARPER COUNTY, OKLAHOMA; Shawn Stoddard, individually and in his official capacity as a deputy sheriff for Harper County, Oklahoma; Josh Snider, individually and in his official capacity as a deputy sheriff for Harper County, Oklahoma; Tommy Painter, individually and in his official capacity as a deputy sheriff for Harper County, Oklahoma; Mark Erwin,
Gohler v. Woodpublic domain
Utah Supreme Court · 1996-07-05 · Published · cited 43× · 919 P.2d 561; 294 Utah Adv. Rep. 25; 1996 Utah LEXIS 64; 1996 WL 382216
ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice: This case is before the court on certification from the United States District Court for the District of Utah pursuant to rule 41 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure. The district court’s certification order presents the following two issues of state law for our determination: (i) whether reliance upon an alleged untrue statement or misleading omission is an essential element of a private cause
Huerta v. Van Clevepublic domain
Paulding County Court of Common Pleas · 1985-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 29 Ohio Misc. 2d 30; 504 N.E.2d 1239; 29 Ohio B. 367; 1985 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 115
Hitchcock, J. Plaintiff requests summary judgment finding defendant Clay Etta Van Cleve liable for personal injury caused by her negligence in respect to an auto-motorcycle collision in this county. From the pleadings and depositions on file it appears that there .is no dispute as to these facts. On June 9,1984, shortly before 1:00 p.m., Clay Etta was, with permission, driving the 1971 Oldsmobile owned by her hu
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1972-05-15 · Published · cited 3× · 356 F. Supp. 577; 176 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 119; 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13764
356 F.Supp. 577 (1972) BLISS & LAUGHLIN INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. BIL-JAX, INC., Defendant. Civ. No. C 71-45. United States District Court, N. D. Ohio, W. D. May 15, 1972. Thomas Maguire, Toledo, Ohio, and William E. Lucas, Malcomb McCaleb, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff. Allen D. Gutchess, Jr., Toledo, Ohio, and David P. Rupp, Jr., Archbold, Ohio, fo
Beagle v. Vasoldpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 1966-08-31 · Published · cited 73× · 417 P.2d 673; 65 Cal. 2d 166; 53 Cal. Rptr. 129; 1966 Cal. LEXIS 186
65 Cal.2d 166 (1966) 417 P.2d 673 53 Cal. Rptr. 129 CARL BEAGLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ELIZABETH VASOLD et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. L.A. 28909. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. August 31, 1966. *169 Rubin, Seltzer & Solomon and Richard I. Singer for
Oregon Supreme Court · 1946-11-07 · Published · cited 2× · 175 P.2d 460; 180 Or. 174; 1946 Ore. LEXIS 205
AFFIRMED. Suit to foreclose liens upon properties and interests held as security for the payment of money due and owing on promissory notes executed by the defendant. Judgment was for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals assigning as error that portion of the decree which directed the sale without right of redemption of certain property rights on which the plaintiff held a lien. Plaintiff and defendant on the 19th day of July, 1943, entered into a financing contract whereby