Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Russell Stephen Johnson”
Russell v. Johnsonpublic domain
210 F.Supp.2d 804 (2002) Willie RUSSELL; Sherwood Brown; Kelvin Jordan; John Nixon; Paul Woodward; and Tracy Hansen; on their own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Robert L. JOHNSON, Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Corrections; et al., Defendants. No. 1:02CV261-D-D. United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Eastern Division. Ju
State v. Russellpublic domain
Yu, J. ¶1 This case involves the question of whether reviewing jury questionnaires for hardship implicates the public trial right. On each of the first two days of jury selection in this case, the trial judge, the attorneys, and petitioner Frederick David Russell held work sessions to review juror questionnaires and to separate the hardship juror requests from the others. These work sessions occurred in the jury room, rather than
State v. Russellpublic domain
Owens, J. ¶1 In certain situations, a police officer may briefly frisk a person to search for weapons that might pose a risk to officer and bystander safety. When justified, these protective frisks do not violate the constitutional prohibi*864tion against unreasonable invasions of individual privacy. In this case, we are asked to further define the permissible scope of th
State v. Russellpublic domain
Fairhurst, J. ¶1 The Court of Appeals reversed Arthur C. Russell’s conviction for first degree rape of a child (domestic violence) because the trial court admitted ER 404(b) evidence without sua sponte giving the jury a limiting instruction regarding the limited purpose for which the evidence was admitted. The State argues that the trial court was not required to give a limiting instruction absent a request for such an instructio
Fox v. Johnsonpublic domain
STEPHENS, Judge. In this appeal, we consider whether Plaintiffs' malicious prosecution claims under North Carolina law brought in Guilford County Superior Court are barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel as a result of the dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) of certain federal law claims brought in Plaintiffs' earlier federal lawsuit against Defendants. Becau
Johnson v. Robertspublic domain
JUSTICE HEARN : **258 *911 Petitioners Dr. John Roberts and the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) sought a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Johns
Russell v. Garrardpublic domain
ORDER David Paul Russell appeals pro se from a district court judgment which dismissed a civil case that he had filed regarding the denial of his application for state unemployment benefits. Russell’s appeal has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). <
Johnson v. Robertspublic domain
LOCKEMY, C.J.: **408In this action Clair Craver Johnson appeals the circuit court's entry of summary judgment in favor of John Roberts, M.D. and the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) (collectively Respondents). Johnson asserts the circuit court erred in finding her claims were time barred by the statute of repose applicable to medical
Russell Brammer v. Violent Hues Productions, LLCpublic domain
DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: Russell Brammer, a commercial photographer, brought this copyright infringement action after learning that Violent Hues Productions, LLC, had made an unlicensed use of one of his photographs on its website. The district court granted summary judgement to Violent Hues, ruling that this unauthorized display constituted "fair use" under the Copyright
Coleman-Adebayo v. Johnsonpublic domain
668 F.Supp.2d 29 (2009) Marsha Lynne COLEMAN-ADEBAYO, Plaintiff, v. Stephen L. JOHNSON, Defendant. Civil Action No. 03-2428 (PLF/JMF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 2, 2009. Bruce J. Terris, Terris, Pravlik & Millian, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Beverly Maria Russell, U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C., Washington, DC,
Johnson ex rel. Johnson v. Bodenhausenpublic domain
ORDER WILLIAM J. MARTÍNEZ, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on three pending motions in these two consolidated actions. In Civil Action No. 10-cv-00341, Defendant Vail Summit Resorts, Inc., d/b/a Breckenridge Ski Resort, Inc. (“Breckenridge”) has filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint for Failure to State a Cause of Action (ECF No. 18), to which Plaintiffs Kane F. Johnson, Kevin L.
Johnson v. Dosseypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JOAN B. GOTTSCHALL, District Judge. Plaintiff Mary Johnson brings Section 1983 claims alleging due process and Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), violations, as well as various Illinois state law claims alleging malicious prosecution, false arrest and false imprisonment, and civil conspiracy. Defendants John Dossey, Kevin L
Kentucky Waterways Alliance v. Johnsonpublic domain
426 F.Supp.2d 612 (2006) KENTUCKY WATERWAYS ALLIANCE, et. al., Plaintiffs v. Stephen L. JOHNSON, et. al., Defendants No. 1:04CV-145-R. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky Bowling Green Division. March 31, 2006. *613 *614 *615 Albert Ettinger, Chicag
Ed Tobergte Associates Co. v. Russell Brands, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GERALD L. RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Ed Tobergte Associates d/b/a Gear 2000 brings this action for patent infringement and false advertising under the Lanham Act. Plaintiff alleges that football shoulder pads sold by Defendant Russell Brands, LLC, through its division Bike Athletics, infringed upon its patent. This matter comes before the Court upon
Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc. v. Johnsonpublic domain
500 F.Supp.2d 701 (2007) INVESCO INSTITUTIONAL (N.A.), INC., Plaintiff v. Stephen M. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. No. 3:07CV-175-R. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville Division. June 26, 2007. *702 *703 Brett E. Coburn, Charles A. Gartland, II, Robert P. Riordan, Alston &am;
Johnson v. AutoZone, Inc.public domain
768 F.Supp.2d 1124 (2011) Peter JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. AUTOZONE, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. CV-09-S-0786-NE. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Northeastern Division. February 24, 2011. *1127 Temple D. Trueblood, Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantazis PC, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff. A. Kent Gieselmann, Jr.,
Sierra Club v. Johnsonpublic domain
614 F.Supp.2d 998 (2008) SIERRA CLUB, Great Basin Resource Watch, Amigos Bravos, and Idaho Conservation League, Plaintiffs, v. Stephen L. JOHNSON, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, and Mary E. Peters, Secretary, United States Department of Transportation, Defendants, and Superfund Settlements Project, RCRA Corrective Action Project, and American Petroleum Institutes, Defendant-Intervenors. No.
Russell v. Superior K-9 Service, Inc.public domain
531 S.E.2d 770 (2000) 242 Ga. App. 896 RUSSELL v. SUPERIOR K-9 SERVICE, INC. et al. No. A99A2442. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 20, 2000. Certiorari Denied September 8, 2000. *771 Kitchens, Kelley & Gaynes, Stephen V. Kern, Atlanta, for appellant. Fellows, Johnson & La
Russell Silverman v. Damaris Johnsonpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-09-00143-CV Russell Silverman, Appellant v. Damaris Johnson, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. C2005-0490A, HONORABLE CHARLES A. STEPHENS II, JUDGE PRESIDING OPINION
R. W. Holdco, Inc. v. Johnsonpublic domain
601 S.E.2d 177 (2004) 267 Ga. App. 859 R.W. HOLDCO, INC. v. JOHNSON et al. (two cases). Andersen, Davidson & Tate, P.C. et al. v. R.W. Holdco, Inc. Moore Stephens Tiller, LLC et al. v. R.W. Holdco, Inc. Nos. A04A0478, A04A0479, A04A0480, A04A0481. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 15, 2004. Certiorari Denied O