Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

130 Cal.App.2d 176 (1955) MERVIN A. LEWIS, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA et al., Respondents. Civ. No. 16175. California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. One. Jan. 11, 1955. Russell F. King for Appellant. Carlson, Collins, Gordon & Bold, John Ormasa, Hagar, Crosby, Rosson & Vendt and Lewis E. Lercara for Respondents. WOOD (Fred

Opinion WEINBERGER, J.* This is an appeal from a judgment denying a writ of mandate sought to compel respondents to employ appellant without requiring her to take and subscribe to the following oath: “I,_, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELIZABETH L. PERRIS, Bankruptcy Judge (Visiting). Contra Costa County Water District (“CCWD”) filed a proof of secured claim in the Chapter 11 case filed by Pillon-Davey & Associates (“Pillon-Davey”). Pillon-Davey filed an objection to the claim and a counterclaim alleging that the total interest claimed by CCWD is usurious, thus relieving Pillon-Davey from any obligation t

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents. S286264 Second Appellate District, Division Seven B326977 Los Angeles County Superior Court 21STCP03475

ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO APPOINT GUARDIAN AD LITEM WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Plaintiffs brought this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants the County of Sacramento, the Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”), Child Protective Services (“CPS”), CPS employees, and Sacramento County counsel based on an investigation by CPS an

Filed 8/24/20 See Concurring and Dissenting Opinion CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION ∗ IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, E069462 Plaintiff, Cross-defendant, and (Super.Ct.No. RIC1412266) Appellant,

Filed 9/16/20 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION1 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, E069462 Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and (Super.Ct.No. RIC1412266) Appellant,

Filed 11/25/15; pub. order 12/17/15 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO NATHAN FLOWERS, B256744 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC515136) v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY METRO

430 F.Supp.2d 1265 (2006) Ron MICKENS, Plaintiff, v. POLK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant. No. 8:00-cv-1725-T-23TGW. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. April 4, 2006. *1266 *1267 *1268 *1269 Timot

The plaintiff sued the defendant in an action of forcible entry and unlawful detainer; a trial was had before the court sitting with a jury; the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the restitution of the premises and $450 damages. The defendant moved for a new trial on all of the statutory grounds, the motion was denied, and the defendant has appealed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure. One Hamble owned a building on Macdonald Avenue, in the city of Ric

THOMAS, Justice. The question presented in this appeal is novel to Wyoming, and it is substantially unique in American jurisprudence. Can the collateral source rule be invoked in favor of plaintiffs who are seeking compensation for inverse condemnation? The appellants in this case (homeowners) were ordered to evacuate their residences in a subdivision of Gillette known as Rawhide Village Subdivision. The reason for the eva

901 P.2d 1107 (1995) H. Douglas MILLER and Danene R. Miller, individually and as conservator(s) of Laura K. Miller, Lindy L. Miller and Clint T. Miller, minors; Steve Adams and Peggy Adams, individually and as conservator(s) of Christie Adams and Jamie Adams, minors; Scott G. Anderson and Tobey J. Anderson, individually and as conservator(s) of Michael Todd Anderson, Chanel S. Anderson, and Tobin P. Anderson, minors; Paul D. Bailey, Jr.; Roxanne G. Randa

ACCEPTED 01-15-00989-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/3/2015 1:47:58 PM

928 F.2d 331 Clinton Roy CALDWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.John LeFAVER, Director of the Department of Social andRehabilitation Services; Department of Social andRehabilitation Services of the State of Montana; GwenFarnsworth, Social Worker; Russell Francetich, SocialWorker; and Mineral County, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-35327. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Ci

Opinion BROUSSARD, J. Defendants appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff sanitation district damages and prejudgment interest in connection with defendant union’s involvement in a labor strike against plaintiff. The case squarely presents issues of great import to public sector labor-management relations, namely whether all strikes by public employees are illegal and, if so, whether the striking union is li

479 U.S. 130 (1986) R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO. v. DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL. No. 85-1021. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 6, 1986 Decided December 9, 1986[*] APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA *132 Erwin N. Griswold argued the cause for appellant in both ca

70 Cal.App.3d 226 (1977) 138 Cal. Rptr. 634 SHARON J. ENGLISH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA et al., Defendants and Respondents; CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF HOMES FOR THE AGING et al., Interveners and Respondents. Docket No. 38284. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two. May 31, 1977.

198 N.J. Super. 109 (1984) 486 A.2d 875 ESSEX COUNTY ADJUSTER ON BEHALF OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICE DEPARTMENT AS ASSIGNEE OF JESSICA MIXON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ARTHUR BROOKES, JR., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted November 13, 1984. Decided December 18, 1984.

381 F.Supp. 125 (1974) LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY et al., Plaintiffs, v. Peter J. BRENNAN, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, et al., Defendants. No. C-73-0282 AJZ. United States District Court, N. D. California. June 20, 1974. *126 Stephen E. Ronfeldt, Russell W. Galloway, Jr., Henry Hewitt, Legal Aid S