Cases

*703 PER CURIAM: The appeal in this diversity case raises an interesting question: What constitutes a new van? We hold that because the question required a jury response, the district court erred in entering summary judgment. I. Chrysler

889 S.W.2d 325 (1993) CEDAR CREST FUNERAL HOME, INC., et al., Appellants, v. Daniel LASHLEY, et al., Appellees. No. 05-93-00003-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. November 29, 1993. *327 Hubert A. Crouch, III, James M. Carlson, Crouch & Hallett, L.L.P., Roy L. Stacy, Michael C. Wright, Calhoun, Gump, Spillman & Stacy,

386 S.C. 1 (2009) 685 S.E.2d 828 MILLIKEN & COMPANY, Appellant/Respondent, v. Brian MORIN, Respondent/Appellant. No. 4610. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Decided August 20, 2009. Heard March 4, 2009. Rehearing Denied November 19, 2009. *3 Charles E. Carpenter, Jr.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for *948Summary Judgment, filed April 11, 2013 (Doc. 8). The Court held a hearing on July 2, 2013. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Defendants violated Plaintiff Fred Dean Chavez’ constitutional rights by in

46 Cal.4th 364 (2009) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ ___ P.3d ___ KAREN L. STRAUSS et al., Petitioners, v. MARK B. HORTON, as State Registrar of Vital Statistics, etc., et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. ROBIN TYLER et al., Petitioners, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO e

684 N.E.2d 964 (1997) 292 Ill. App.3d 80 225 Ill.Dec. 973 Angela SARNO and Better Care, Ltd., Plaintiffs, v. Dr. Alfred A. AKKERON, Broadway Real Estate Corporation, Broadway Orthopedic, Ltd., Albert L. Grasso, Paul Thermen, Larry Beller and Evans, Marshall, & Pease, P.C., Defendants (Evans, Marshall, & Pease, P.C., Counterplaintiff-Appellant, v. Albert L. Grasso, Counterdefendant-Ap

4 F.Supp.2d 80 (1998) FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for the New Connecticut Bank and Trust Co., N.A. Plaintiff, v. Rochelle ALTHOLTZ, et al., Defendants. No. CIV3:96CV0382(DJS)(TPS). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. March 16, 1998. *81 *82 Carolyn W. Kone, Fab

669 F.3d 144 (2012) Shawn C. SHARP, Appellant v. Superintendent JOHNSON; Deputy Superintendent Krysevig; Deputy Superintendent Dickson; Deputy Superintendent Stickman, Program Manager Rhoda A. Winstead; Chaplain Father Tursa, Chaplain Tanko Ibrahiym, Superintendent Conner Blain; Deputy Superintendent Paul Stowitzky; Deputy Superintendent John Miller, Captain Coleman; Lieutenant Fisher; Major Melvin Lockett; Lieutenant Matcus; Lieutenant Blakey; J

Hunt, Presiding Justice. This appeal involves a three-way dispute over ownership of certain property, and raises issues concerning the applicability of a reverter clause in a deed to a charitable group. Atlantic Cotton Mills brought this action seeking a declaration that because of the reverter clause, it is the owner of title to property which it had given to the Rebecca Baptist Church. Atlantic named, as defendants, First Re

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA YASMEEN WINSTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 23 - 2123 (LLA) GREGORY T. MONAHAN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Yasmeen Winston and India Johnson bring this action against the U.S. Park Police, the U.S. Secret

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CARLTON W. REEVES, District Judge. Two same-sex couples brought this lawsuit challenging Mississippi’s laws prohibiting same-sex marriage. One couple wishes to marry in Mississippi; the other was married out-of-state and wants Mississippi to recognize the marriage. A group advocating for gay and lesbian equality has joined their effort to seek relief on behalf of it

85 F.Supp.2d 69 (2000) Leonard J. PACHECO, individually and as Co-Trustee of the Mary T. Pacheco Trust, as Co-Trustee of the FE & Mary T. Pacheco Trust, Jim Beebe, individually and as Co-Trustee of the Mary T. Pacheco Trust, as Co-Trustee of the FE & Mary T. Pacheco, Tari Eastman, individually and as Co-Trustee of the Mary T. Pacheco Trust, as Co-Trustee of the FE & Mary T. Pacheco Trust, Miguelangel Aponte-Rios, individually and as Co-truste

224 Kan. 420 (1978) 582 P.2d 251 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DONALD McQUEEN, Appellant. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ELMER HARDYWAY, JR., Appellant. Nos. 48,790, 49,047 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed July 15, 1978. Jack Focht, of Smith, Shay, Farmer & Wetta, of Wichita, argued the cause and was on the brief for a

229 P.3d 551 (2009) 2010 OK CIV APP 12 In re FARMERS MED-PAY LITIGATION. Ladonna Houck, Roberta Oliver, and Tasha Sherman-Harris, Individually and as Representatives of All Other Similarly Situated Insureds, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Farmers Insurance Company, Inc.; Farmers Group, Inc.; Farmers Insurance Exchange; Mid-Century Insurance Company; Truck Insurance Exchange; and Fire Insurance Exchange, Defendants/Appellants

469 F.Supp. 693 (1979) Peggy J. CONNOR et al., Plaintiffs, and United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Cliff FINCH et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 3830(A). United States District Court, S. D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. April 13, 1979. Frank R. Parker, Jackson, Miss., for plaintiffs. Gerald W. Jones, U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D

60 N.W.2d 885 (1953) SANFORD v. LUCE. No. 48377. Supreme Court of Iowa. November 17, 1953. Brown & Nordenson, Sioux City, for appellant. *886 Hanna & O'Brien, Sioux City, for appellee. SMITH, Justice. The petition (filed June 24, 1952) alleged an oral agreement under which defendant would reimburse pl

Supplemental Opinion. PER CURIAM: Our prior opinion in this case1 sets forth the nature, issues and background of the subject litigation, thus obviating the need for any extended discussion thereof in this supplement. We there concluded, Laws of the First Session, Sixty-Fourth General Assembly, Chapter 95 (H.F. 732), providing for reapportionment of both houses of the General

After much doubt and considerable research I concur. The result of my research and analysis, which forms the basis of my conclusion, I set out below as it differs somewhat from the approach and reasoning of Judge FAUST. The provision governing the liability of the company for an extra $1,000 in case of accidental death reads, with presently irrelevant omissions, as follows: "The amount * * * shall be payable * * * upon receipt of proof that the death of the insured occurred * *

The petition alleges twenty-three assignments of error. With one exception they are all based on the rulings of the court in the admission of testimony. The majority of the assignments are unimportant and were not referred to in the oral argument. They have all been examined, however, and *Page 34 such of them as are deemed worthy of comment will be considered here: The first objection relates to the testimony of Mrs. Margaret Curley. The witness t

196 N.W.2d 209 (1972) In the Matter of the LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTING OF the GENERAL ASSEMBLY of the State of Iowa as Enacted By the 64th General Assembly of the State of Iowa, House File 732. Louise NOUN et al., Applicants, Hugh D. Clark and James J. Wengert, Applicants, Clifton Larson, Applicant, v. Richard C. TURNER, Respondent. Nos. 55021-55023. Supreme Court of Iowa.