Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
17 opinions for “Ruth Ann Brunette”
Alice Calloway v. Larry Millerpublic domain
FENNER, District Judge. Appellant, Alice Calloway, appeals from the order of the district court granting appel-lees’ motion for summary judgment. Appellant, Alice Calloway, was the City Recorder for the City of Crawfordsville, Arkansas. Appellees Larry Miller, Nolan Dawson, Thomas Graham, and Lindsey Fairley are all members of the Crittenden County Election Commission. Appellee,
Ruth v. Fenchelpublic domain
37 N.J. Super. 295 (1955) 117 A.2d 284 JAMES R. RUTH, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. IRVING FENCHEL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued September 7, 1955. Decided October 11, 1955. *299 Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD. Mr. Seymour Margulie
Calloway v. Millerpublic domain
147 F.3d 778 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,479 Alice CALLOWAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Larry MILLER, Nolan Dawson, Thomas Graham, Lindsey Fairley,Individually and in their capacities as Members of theElection Commission of Crawfordsville; Ruth Trent,Individually and in her official capacity as County Clerk,Defendants-Appellees. No. 98-1191. United Stat
St. Lucas Ass'n v. City of Chicagopublic domain
571 N.E.2d 865 (1991) 212 Ill. App.3d 817 156 Ill.Dec. 885 ST. LUCAS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. No. 1-89-2710. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division. April 8, 1991. *866 Kelly R. Wels
Mitchell v. Statepublic domain
650 S.W.2d 801 (1983) Andrew Lee MITCHELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 68915. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. April 27, 1983. Rehearing Denied June 15, 1983. *803 Curtis L. Owen, Tyler, for appellant. Hunter B. Brush, Dist. Atty. and Ruth J. Blake, Asst. Dist. Atty. Tyler,
United States v. Jonathan Jay Pollardpublic domain
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part: I agree with the majority that the “plea wiring” was not an unlawful coercion of Pollard’s guilty plea and that Chief Judge Robinson did not abuse his discretion in refusing to recuse himself or to conduct a hearing into the claim of ex parte contacts. But because the government's breach of the plea agreement was a fundamental misca
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
SACK, Circuit Judge: In this litigation, judgment creditors of the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) attempt to execute on $1.68 billion in bond proceeds allegedly owned by Iran’s central bank. The Supreme Court has instructed that in an execution proceeding concerning a foreign sovereign’s assets, any defense predicated on foreign sovereign immunity must rise or fall on the text of the Foreign Sovereign
14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
15‐0690 Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2015 4 (Argued: June 8, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2017*) 5
Lenox v. City of Medfordpublic domain
Gadsby, P. J. This is an action of contract in which the plaintiff seeks to recover $662.07 under Count 1 for payments which she says were due from October 16, 1951 to February 21, 1952 on ac-count of an annuity which she alleges was granted and voted her “By the appropriate public authority” of the City of Medford under the provisions of Chapter 32 Sections 89-89A. In Count 2 plain-tiff alleges that the defendant owes
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
515 F.Supp.2d 25 (2007) Deborah D. PETERSON, Personal Representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple (Dec.), et al., Plaintiffs, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 01-2094 (RCL), 01-2684(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 7, 2007. *26
Seher v. Woodlawn School District No. 26public domain
*822Gronna, District J. This is a trial de novo of an action by an employee, employed for a particular term, at stipulated wages, against his employer for breach of contract, namely, wrongful dismissal before the expiration of such term. Defendant is a common school district. On April 11, 1950, its three-member board voted 2 to 1 to re-employ plaintiff,
WESLEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellees (“Plaintiffs”) are direct or indirect victims of terrorist acts linked to the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”), against which they hold unsatisfied money judgments. Plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to enforce these judgments against Defendants-Appellants Alavi Foundation and 650 Fifth Avenue Company (together, “Defendants”),1 pursuant to the Forei
State v. Newmanpublic domain
BEAN, J. This cause was tried before a jury in the Circuit Court on the complaint of one Ruth Wilkinson in conformity with Sections 2550-2563, Or. L., charging the defendant, H. L. Newman, with being the father of the child of said Ruth Wilkinson. Upon the trial of the cause at the close of the testimony counsel for the defendant requested the court to instruct the jury, to the effect, that before they could fin
McMasters v. Statepublic domain
This action is an outgrowth of an alleged spiritualistic "reading" by a "medium" in a state of trance, purporting to convey a message to one Bessie Jones from the spirit of Minnehaha, a legendary Indian girl as found in Longfellow's poem Hiawatha. Bessie Jones, an attache of the county attorney's office, for the purpose of laying a foundation for the prosecution, went to the residence of the medium, Mrs. McMasters, in Oklahoma City, and there solicited the reading, which was given in consider
Steen v. Nortonpublic domain
RyaN, C. J. The affidavit on which the garnishment of the respondent before the justice of the peace was founded, is fatally defective, in omitting to state that the money, effects *413and credits of the principal debtor in the garnishee’s possession are not exempt. The statute makes the statement essential, and it is issuable. Winterfield v. Railway Co., 29 Wis.
ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS