Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ruth E Brown”
In Re Estate of Ina Ruth Brownpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 4, 2012 Session at Knoxville1 IN RE ESTATE OF INA RUTH BROWN Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals, Eastern Section Chancery Court for Knox County No. 61159-3 Michael W. Moyers, Chancellor No. E2011-00179-SC-R11-CV - Filed March 22,
Brown v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM: **57 Samuel Brown Jr. filed a petition for a writ of certiorari seeking appellate review of an order granting summary judgment to the State in his application for post-conviction relief (PCR). The PCR court dismissed the action on the ground Brown had completed serving his sentence
Libertarian Party of Michigan v. Ruth Johnsonpublic domain
OPINION ROGERS, Circuit Judge. This case involves the Libertarian Party’s challenge to a Michigan election regulation—the “sore loser” statute—which prevents a candidate who has run in and lost a party primary from running as a candidate of another party in the subsequent general election. The Libertarian Party of Michigan asserts that Michigan wrongly p
Brown v. Hahnemann University Hospitalpublic domain
MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. Plaintiff Amos Brown, III, brings this pro se medical malpractice action against Defendant Hahnemann University Hospital (“Hahnemann”), alleging that Hahne-mann negligently inserted an intravenous catheter (“IV”) in his arm, causing significant injuries. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and, for the reasons that follow, the C
Brown v. Perezpublic domain
EBEL, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants Blake Brown, Dean Biggs, Jacqueline Deherrera, Ruth Ann Head, Marlene Mason, Roxanne McFall, Richard Medloek, and Bernadette Smith (“Plaintiffs”) appeal a summary judgment order upholding Defendants-Appellees Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, and the Office of Workers Compensation’s (“OWC”) (collect
Middleton v. EP Energy E & P Co.public domain
WILLIAMS, J. _JjThe defendants, Chesapeake Louisiana, L.P., Faulconer 2004 Limited Partnership, LLP, Faulconer Energy Joint Venture-1990, LLP, Faulconer Energy Limited Partnership, Goodrich Petroleum Company, LLC and EP Energy E & P Company, LP, appeal a summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, Ruth Middleton, Donald Shepard, Anthony Spiller and others, terminating mineral leases covering land located in DeSoto Paris
Brown v. Perezpublic domain
ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RAYMOND P. MOORE, United States District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 51 & 52). Plaintiffs Blake Brown, Dean Biggs, Jacqueline De-herrera, Ruth Ann Head, Marlene Mason, Roxanne McFall, Richard Medlock and Bernadette Smith (“Plaintiffs”) seek an order finding that Defendants viola
Glenda Brown and William Jones v. Ruth Sanderspublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00212-CV ___________________________ GLENDA BROWN AND WILLIAM JONES, Appellants V. RUTH SANDERS, Appellee On Appeal from the 431st District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 17-3609-158 Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Walker, JJ.
WELLFORD, Circuit Judge. This is the third appeal arising from a consent decree entered in a large class action, employment discrimination suit brought in federal district court against the defendant, General Motors Corporation (GM). The decree purported to settle all past claims of discrimination as well as all claims arising from the future effects of past discrimination. Ho
Plummer v. Brownpublic domain
In re Brown, Ora Lee Plummer et al.; Hubbard, Ruth Plummer; Plummer, Joyce Marie; Plummer, Joseph; Plummer, Irma Jean; Plummer, Samuel Paul; — Defendant/s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, Nineteenth Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 308,103; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2005 CA 1059. Denied.
Young v. Brown University ex rel. Paxsonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION MARY M. LISI, District Judge. The plaintiff, Christopher Young (“Young”), filed claims against Brown University (“Brown”) and Deputy Chief of Brown’s Department of Public Safety, Paul Shanley (“Officer Shanley,” together with Brown, the “Defendants”)1 after Brown campus police officers removed Young from the Brown campus for his disruptive behavior durin
In the Matter of the Irrevocable Trust of Mary Ruth Moeder Susan R. Moeder v. Salin Bank & Trust Companypublic domain
BAILEY, Judge. Case Summary [1] Salin Bank and Trust Company (“Salin”), trustee of the Mary Ruth Moe-der Revocable Living Trust Agreement (the “Trust”), petitioned the probate court to approve an accounting of the Trust and to resign as trustee. Susan Moeder (“Moeder”), the former trustee and current contingent remainder beneficiary of the Trust, objec
Brown v. Duncanpublic domain
836 N.E.2d 78 (2005) 361 Ill. App.3d 125 296 Ill.Dec. 663 George BROWN, Individually, and as Parent and Next Friend of Brittany Brown, Charles Lee, Titus Lee, Harriet Greenfield, Individually, and as Parent and Next Friend of Kyla Greenfield, Jacquelyn Scott, Staci Walker, and Bessie Scott, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Arne DUNCAN, Chief Executive Officer; the Board of Education of the City of Chicago;
JOHN E. KING AND ASSOCIATES v. Tolerpublic domain
675 S.E.2d 492 (2009) JOHN E. KING AND ASSOCIATES et al. v. TOLER et al. Arrowhead Clinic, Inc. et al. v. Toler et al. Brown v. Toler et al. H. Brown Management Company et al. v. Toler et al. Nos. A08A2227, A08A2228, A08A2229, A08A2230. Court of Appeals of Georgia. February 25, 2009. Reconsideration Denied March 12, 2009.
Epstein v. Brownpublic domain
363 S.C. 372 (2005) 610 S.E.2d 816 Franklin M. EPSTEIN, M.D. and Southern Neurological Institute, Appellants, v. David A. BROWN, Esquire, Respondent. No. 25953. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard January 4, 2005. Decided March 21, 2005. *374 Hugh M. Claytor, and Heather Goetz Ruth, of
State v. Ruthpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Ruth, 2020-Ohio-4506.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO FAYETTE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2019-08-018 : OPINION - vs -
Plummer v. Brownpublic domain
In re Lewis, Mae Etta Plummer;— Plaintiff; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, Nineteenth Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 308,103; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2005 CA 1059. Denied.
Brown v. Statepublic domain
Benham, Justice. This appeal is from James Eugene Brown’s conviction for malice murder, armed robbery, hijacking a motor vehicle, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, theft of services, and possession of a pistol by a person under the age of 18.1 Evidence adduced at trial supported a finding of the following as facts. The body of cab driver Vickie Forrester was found on a di
State v. Brownpublic domain
260 Wis.2d 125 (2003) 2003 WI App 34 659 N.W.2d 110 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Shon D. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.[] No. 02-1000-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs October 11, 2002. Decided January 2, 2003. *127 On b
Brown Bros. Harriman Trust Co. v. Bensonpublic domain
STEPHENS, Judge. The sole issue before the Court in this case is whether the North Carolina Constitution requires application of the common law rule against perpetuities’ restriction of the remote vesting of future interests in property. We conclude that it does not. I. Factual Background and Procedural History On 27 November 2007, Defendant Anne P. Benson executed a trust (“Be