Cases

Page 138 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL February 15, 2022 644 FEBRUARY, 2022 341 Conn. 644 Gonzalez v. O & G Industries, Inc. ELVIRA R. GONZALEZ ET AL. v. O & G INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. (SC 20422) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria,

SECTION: “G” (1) ORDER NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In this litigation, Plaintiff Robert Tem-plet, Sr. (“Plaintiff’) alleges that he. suffered exposure to asbestos and asbestos-containing products that were- designed, manufactured, sold, and/or supplied by a number of Defendant companies while Plaintiff was employed by Defendant Avondale Industries, Inc. (“Avondale”)

HEIRS OF LYDIA * NO. 2023-CA-0212 BERGERON, WIFE OF/AND SIDNEY J. SIMONEAUX LAND * COURT OF APPEAL PARTNERSHIP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP * FOURTH CIRCUIT VERSUS * STATE OF LOUISIANA B-P AMOCO, AMERADA HESS * * * * * * * CORPORATION, WM. T. BURTON INDUSTRIES, INC., BROCK EXPLORATION CORPORATION, MONGRUE OIL COMPANY, INC., NORTHWEST OIL COMPANY, LYNAL, INCORPORATED, QUINT

EVELEIGH, J., dissenting. I agree with the majority that the trial court in the present case improperly determined that "the plain and unambiguous meaning of the word 'paid' ... in [General Statutes] § 31-291 is 'simply to transfer money.' " I further agree with the majority that "the term 'paid compensation benefits' in § 31-291 requires a principal employer to demonstrate that it bore the cost of all

HEIRS OF LYDIA * NO. 2023-CA-0212 BERGERON, WIFE OF/AND SIDNEY J. SIMONEAUX LAND * COURT OF APPEAL PARTNERSHIP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP * FOURTH CIRCUIT VERSUS * STATE OF LOUISIANA B-P AMOCO, AMERADA HESS * * * * * * * CORPORATION, WM. T. BURTON INDUSTRIES, INC., BROCK EXPLORATION CORPORATION, MONGRUE OIL COMPANY, INC., NORTHWEST OIL COMPANY, LYNAL, INCORPORATED, Q

*733MEMORANDUM OPINION R. DAVID PROCTOR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Over the past four decades, singer-songwriter Joni Mitchell has won Grammys in the traditional folk and pop music categories, as well as a lifetime achievement award. Many of her songs are hits and have been covered by such diverse musicians as Prince, Amy Grant, the Counting Crows,

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. The government appeals from a decision of the Court of International Trade holding that a retaliatory duty order assessing duties against certain imports of Gilda Industries, Inc. had terminated by operation of law. The Court of International Trade ordered liquidation of Gilda’s goods without assessment of the duty, and ordered the government to refund, wi

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. This litigation arises out of defendants’ construction of a sewer system throughout Nassau and Suffolk Counties (the *1029Counties), including areas under plaintiffs’ jurisdiction. In the 1970s, the Counties entered into public works

PER CURIAM. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

MOORE, Circuit Judge. Ashley Furniture, Inc., Ethan Allen Global, Inc., and Ethan Allen Operations, Inc. (Appellants) appeal from the decisions of the Court of International Trade (CIT) dismissing Appellants’ complaints seeking compensation pursuant to the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (the Byrd Amendment) for failure to state a claim for relief. Because the CIT correctly concluded that Appellants are not Affect

PER CURIAM. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

818 F.Supp.2d 1355 (2012) ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendants, and American Furniture Manufacturers Committee for Legal Trade, Kincaid Furniture Co., Inc., L. & J.G. Stickley, Inc., Sandberg Furniture Manufacturing Company, Inc., Stanley Furniture Company, Inc., T. Copeland and Sons, Inc., and Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Company, Inc., Defendant-Intervenors. Slip Op. 12-14. Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice. [¶ 1] Joseph Vicknair and twelve other plaintiffs appealed from a district court summary judgment dismissing their asbestos-related product liability actions against Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc., and numerous other companies on the grounds that the applicable statutes of limitations had run on their claims. We affirm, concluding the district court did not err in ruling North Dakota’s six-year sta

315 B.R. 74 (2004) In re HOFFINGER INDUSTRIES, INC., Debtor. Hoffinger Industries, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Brad Rinehart, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 2:01BK20514M. Adversary No. 2:01AP2014. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division. September 27, 2004. *75 Charles R. Camp, Charles T. Coleman, Wright, Lindsey &a;

ON MOTION LOURIE, Circuit Judge. ORDER FieldTurf, Inc. and FieldTurf International, Inc. (FieldTurf) move for summary vacatur of the district court’s order awarding attorney fees. Southwest Recreational Industries, Inc. (Southwest) submits a memorandum regarding “further proceedings” and opposes FieldTurfs motion for summary vacatur. FieldTurf submits a response to the memor

MAYER, Circuit Judge. AquaTex Industries, Inc. (“AquaTex”) appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, AquaTex Indus. Inc. v. Techniche Solutions, No. 02-CV-914 (M.D.Tenn. Sept. 27, 2004), granting summary judgment of noninfringement in favor of Techniche Solutions (“Techniche”). Because there was no litera

308 B.R. 362 (2004) In re HOFFINGER INDUSTRIES, INC., Debtor. Hoffinger Industries, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Brad Rinehart, Defendant. No. 2:01-BK-20514M. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division. April 16, 2004. *363 *364 *365 Charles R.

SANDSTROM, Justice. [¶ 1] Joseph M. Vicknair and fourteen other plaintiffs appeal from a judgment severing them from two lawsuits and dismissing without prejudice on the ground of forum non conveniens their asbestos-related product liability action against Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc., and numerous other defendants. We conclude the district court erred in granting the motion to dismiss on the basis of forum non c

Justice WALLER: We granted certification from the United States District Court of South Carolina pursuant to Rule 228, SCACR, to address the following three questions: 1. May a plaintiff maintain a product liability claim in South Carolina under a successor liability theory against a defendant which purchased only assets of a voluntarily bankrupt selling company in an arms-length and court-approv

329 B.R. 411 (2005) In re GRUMMAN OLSON INDUSTRIES, INC., Debtor. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Grumman Olson Industries, Inc., Plaintiff, v. James A. McConnell, H.I.G. Capital LLC, and Specialized Vehicles Corporation, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 02-16131 (SMB), Adversary No. 04-4711. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. August 25, 2005.