Cases

899 F.Supp. 1578 (1995) Samuel Andrew LESLIE, Plaintiff, v. INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 1:94-cv-370(Br)(R). United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division. August 22, 1995. *1579 John F. Martin, Tupelo, MS, Richard L. Watters, Mobile, AL, for plaintiff. Paul B. Eason, Jackson, MS,

05/13/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 1, 2025 Session LESLIE K. JONES v. TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 22-1276-111 I’Ashea L. Myles, Chancellor ___________________________________

GEWIN, Circuit Judge: George Leslie Samuels (appellant) was indicted, tried and convicted of various violations of the Internal Revenue Code. The ten count indictment, returned on March 8, 1965, by a federal grand jury in the San Antonio division of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, specifi

SMITH, Circuit Judge. This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. On June 20, 2013, we affirmed Samuel Ford’s convictions for knowingly and intentionally distributing a mixture of heroin to Joseph Scolaro resulting in Seolaro’s death, with the distribution occurring within 1,000 feet of a school, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)

SMITH, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Samuel Ford (“Ford”) of knowingly and intentionally distributing a mixture of heroin to Joseph Scolaro resulting in Scolaro’s death, with the distribution occurring within 1,000 feet of a school, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C), 851, and 860(a) (“Count I”), and knowingly and intentionally distributing a mixture containing

*********** The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Hall and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award, except for minor modifications. Accordingly, the Full Commission aff

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GEORGE K. YOUNG, JR., No. 12-17808 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:12-cv-00336- HG-BMK STATE OF HAWAII; NEIL ABERCROMBIE, in his capacity as Governor of the State of Hawaii; OPINION DAVID MARK LOUIE I, Esquire, in his capacity as State Attor

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1167 TIMOTHY B. BOSTIC; TONY C. LONDON; CAROL SCHALL; MARY TOWNLEY, Plaintiffs − Appellees, JOANNE HARRIS; JESSICA DUFF; CHRISTY BERGHOFF; VICTORIA KIDD, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Intervenors, v. GEORGE E. SCHAEFER, III

FEW, C.J. Chris Thompson Services, LLC and its carrier appeal the workers’ compensation commission’s refusal to order a transfer of responsibility pursuant to subsection 42-l-415(A) of the South Carolina Code (2015). Because the commission has not yet ruled on the merits of Samuel Rose’s entire claim for benefits, however, the order is not a final decision, and thus not immediately appealable. We dismiss. Ro

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS. RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge. Do federal courts have jurisdiction over petitions for writs of habeas corpus filed by aliens captured abroad and detained as enemy combatants at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba? The question has been the recurring subject of legislation and litigation

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

(2008) REACHING HEARTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, et al., Defendants. Civil Case No. RWT 05-1688. United States District Court, D. Maryland. November 4, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION ROGER W. TITUS, District Judge. The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment envisions a land of religious diversity and tol

569 S.E.2d 572 (2002) 256 Ga. App. 726 LADOW v. The STATE. No. A02A0635. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 11, 2002. Reconsideration Denied July 26, 2002. Certiorari Denied September 30, 2002. *573 Whitmer & Law, George H. Law III, Gainesville, for appellant. Le

112 P.3d 1247 (2005) 2005 UT App 203 Deanna PUGH and Robyn Huffman, Petitioners and Appellees, v. Leslie DOZZO-HUGHES (Sic) Leslie Dozzo-Otero, Respondent and Appellant. No. 20031026-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. May 5, 2005. Rehearing Denied June 16, 2005. *1248 Michael D. Hughes, Rick C.

129 S.W.3d 839 (2004) KNOX COUNTY, Kentucky, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. George HAMMONS, Jack Davis, Jerry Strong and David Evans, Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Nos. 2002-SC-0530-DG, 2002-SC-1080-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. March 18, 2004. As Modified March 19, 2004. *840 Brent L. Caldwell, Jaron Paul Blandford

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

JAMES E. GRITZNER, Senior Judge This matter comes before the Court on a Motion for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs1 filed by Plaintiffs. ECF No. 93. Defendants have filed objections. ECF No. 97. Neither party requested a hearing on the Motion, nor does the Court find a hearing is necessary. The matter is fully submitted and ready for disposition. I. BACKGROUND

FOR PUBLICATION Sep 23 2014, 10:40 am ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE THE BRANHAM CORPORATION: WHITE RIVER: DONN H. WRAY PAUL D. VINK MARC A. MENKVELD BRYAN H. BABB Katz & Korin, PC Bose McKinney & Evans LLP Indianapolis, Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana ROGER L. BURRUS ATTORNEYS FOR

71 F.Supp.2d 909 (1999) Clayton COLLINS, Leslie Keller, Harry McKeddie, Timothy Hughes, Samuel Briggins, Wayne Paschal, Robert Jackson, and George R. Egnor, Plaintiffs, v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC. and it affiliated division, Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Manufacturing, and United Steel Workers of America, Local 715, Defendant. No. 1:99-CV-235. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Divisio

65 B.R. 566 (1986) In re George A. SAFREN, Helen Safren, Ronald I. Safren, Rosa Jean Safren, Debtors. Bankruptcy Nos. LA-82-18569-SB, LA-86-00846-SB, LA-82-18570-SB and LA-86-00847-SB. United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California. September 26, 1986. *567 Jeffrey Krause of Stutman, Treister & Glatt, Los Angeles, Cal., for debtors.