Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “SANDERS v. 3M COMPANY”
NicSand, Inc. v. 3M Companypublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 06a0282p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - NICSAND, INC.,
NicSand, Inc. v. 3M Co.public domain
507 F.3d 442 (2007) NICSAND, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 3M COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 05-3431. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: March 7, 2007. Decided and Filed: October 17, 2007. *443 *444 *445
NicSand, Inc. v. 3M Companypublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0424p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - NIC
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ABDUL K. KALLON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The plaintiffs in this case are West Morgan-East Lawrence Water and Sewer Authority (the “Authority”), in its individual capacity, and Tommy Lindsey, Lanette Lindsey, and Larry Watkins (collectively “Representative Plaintiffs”), who bring this action both individually and on behalf of a class of persons similarly situated.
Consolidation Coal Company v. Georgia Power Companypublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1603 CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, Defendant – Appellant, v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, Defendant – Appellee, and DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., Plaintiff, and UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY; AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATIO
Lisa S. Van Amburg, Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in favor of defendants Frank J. Miceli, in his individual capacity and as trustee of the Frank Miceli Revocable Trust,. the unknown beneficiaries of said trust, Stephen Miceli, in his individual capacity
Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company v. Larry Adkins, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Newbern Brown Adkinspublic domain
Opinion issued December 3, 2020 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00993-CV NO. 01-18-01064-CV NO. 01-18-01071-CV ——————————— MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-01-00073-CV
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00518-CV Rosemarie Satterfield, as Representative of the Estate of Jerrold Braley, Deceased, Appellant v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., Individually and as Successor to Mundet Cork Corporation, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNT
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00518-CV Rosemarie Satterfield, as Representative of the Estate of Jerrold Braley, Deceased, Ap
Berry v. Saferpublic domain
293 F.Supp.2d 694 (2003) Anthony BERRY, Almeta Dorsey, Johnny Anderson, Elroy Thomas, Minnie Woods, Lee Guice, Don Donaldson, Thelma Sanders, and John Does 1-21 Plaintiffs v. Morley SAFER; Viacom Inc.; 3M Company; CBS Broadcasting, Inc.; Don Hewitt; Media General Operations, Inc., d/b/a WJTV; Beau Strittman; Wyatt Emmerich; Deidre Naphin; Jennifer Breheny; and Jane Does 1-1000 Defendants No. 5:03-CV-3.
Strabag, Spa v. Credit Agricole Cibpublic domain
Strabag, Spa v Credit Agricole Cib (2023 NY Slip Op 05671) Strabag, Spa v Credit Agricole Cib 2023 NY Slip Op 05671 Decided on November 09, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
Consolidation Coal Co. v. Georgia Power Co.public domain
WYNN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. In 1983 and 1984, Georgia Power Company (“Georgia Power”) sold Ward Transformer Company (“Ward Transformer”) over one hundred electrical transformers at “scrapping” auctions. The used transformers were in various stages of disrepair and contained varying amounts of oil tainted with polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”) — potent human carcinogens “linked to skin cancer, liver cance
Smith v. Union Carbide Corp.public domain
KITCHENS, Justice, dissenting. ¶ 18. I fully join Justice King’s dissent. He correctly identifies the issue on appeal: whether the plaintiffs presented sufficient evidence of causation. Despite criticism that the King opinion “does not apply any legal standard to the evidence,” the dissent clearly addresses the statute’s requirement that “[t]he defective and unreasonably dangerous condition of the product proxim
Der Weer v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.public domain
DONOHUE, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (March 21, 2014) BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Litwin Corporation’s motion to strike Plaintiff Estate of John Der Weer’s claim for punitive damages. Co-Defendants John Crane Packing Company, Amerada Hess Corporation, Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corporation, Alltite Gasket Company, Rubber & Gasket Company of Puerto Rico, M
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant QUALITY CARTRIDGES, INC., JOHN DOES, 1-20, BLUE TRADING LLC, EXPRINT INTERNATIONAL, INC., LD PRODUCTS, INC., PRINTRONIC CORPORATION, TESEN DEVELOPMENT (HONG KONG) CO. LTD., BENIGNO ADEVA AND HIS
Giles v. Chicago Drum, Inc.public domain
631 F.Supp.2d 981 (2009) Bobby GILES, individually, and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Jannie Giles, Deceased, Plaintiffs, v. CHICAGO DRUM, INC., et al., Defendants. Ronald Jones Jr., Special Administrator for the Estate of Kejuan Dickens, Deceased, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Chicago Drum, Inc., et al., Defendants. Mary E. Tuff, as Special Administrator for the Estate of Douglas Tuff, Deceased, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Limelight Networks, Inc. v. XO Communications, LLCpublic domain
OPINION John A. Gibney, Jr. United States District Judge As the popularity of the internet has soared since the late 1990s, problems with data congestion have arisen over the lanes of the information superhighway. In' order to keep up with ever-growing demand for digital content delivered over the internet, inventors constantly develop and patent new technology to move high volumes of data, at high speeds
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SERVE DEFENDANT AND FOR ADDITIONAL TIME KAREN E. SCHREIER, Chief Judge. Mapping Your Future, Inc. (plaintiff) moves for a court order permitting service of process upon Mapping Your Future Services, Ltd. (defendant) via email because plaintiffs efforts to serve defendant have been unsuccessful. Plaintiff also moves for additional time to ser
416 B.R. 661 (2009) In re CONTINENTALAFA DISPENSING COMPANY, Debtor. Armin Tool & Mfg, Plaintiff, v. Continental Dispensing Company, et. al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-45921-659. Adversary No. 08-4233-659. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. October 28, 2009. *662 Craig A. Smith, Polsinell