Cases

91 Cal.Rptr.2d 609 (2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 493 FLORENCE WESTERN MEDICAL CLINIC, et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Diana BONTа as Director, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. B118106. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Four. January 7, 2000. *611 Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Charlton

In The Court of Appeals For The<

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-00403-COA WILLIAM GERALD GILMER APPELLANT/ CROSS-APPELLEE v. SANDRA GIACHELLI GILMER APPELLEE/ CROSS-APPELLANT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/15/2018

IUJWcMAM&m; 14m Q&aw; §f, ^a^^^m ">•••;•••'. • ' •-.uKtifM;" 4JLL- i5~;oo*9<;-cr ,;-;,;.- .^^^^ '-,-7' • '..- I : - .' ***&?"«*« ,t : co^Utss' tock ian •CMw tiwft. tiNMEtfw&M;' Tft)fc QJM0J«r(LWO3 CJJZ^liJti. tito&MAlY-; CjQMfM/e t a

621 F.3d 296 (2010) Albert W. FLORENCE v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF the COUNTY OF BURLINGTON; Burlington County Jail; Warden Juel Cole, Individually and officially as Warden of Burlington County Jail; Essex County Correctional Facility; Essex County Sheriff's Department; State Trooper John Doe, Individually and in his capacity as a State Trooper; John Does 1-3 of Burlington County Jail & Essex County Correctional Facility who performed t

*19 Karen King Mitchell, Judge Sandra D’Avis filed a due process complaint on behalf of her granddaughter, protesting the Independence School District’s (District) denial of special education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The hearing panel dismissed the complaint beca

993 F.Supp. 565 (1998) Dee I. CHANCE, et al. v. Kent C. SULLIVAN, et al. No. CIV.A. G-97-282. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. February 5, 1998. John F. Nichols, Houston, TX, W. Mark Lanier, Lanier Parker and Sullivan, Houston, TX, for Dee I. Chance. Michael Louis Minns, Houston, TX, Ken N. Bigham, Jr., Schulenburg, TX, for J. Cha

Opinion of the Court by Justice SCHRODER. We granted discretionary review in this case to decide whether the City of Florence, Kentucky, violated the Open Meetings Act (KRS 61.800 et seq.) when it agreed in private discussions to settle a pending lawsuit in a zoning matter, when the settlement itself was voted on in an open meeting. Because the Open Meetings Act specifically allows for private discussions of

532 F.3d 933 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Melvin Eric GEORGE, Appellant. No. 06-3172. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued May 12, 2008. Decided July 22, 2008. Sandra G. Roland, Assistant Federal Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. with her on the briefs was A.J. Kramer, Federal Public Def

482 F.3d 532 UNITED STATES of America, Appelleev.Paul ASKEW, Appellant. No. 04-3092. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued November 17, 2006. Decided April 6, 2007. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 04cr00010-01).</

ORDER AND OPINION MARGARET B. SEYMOUR, Senior District Judge. On October 4, 2005, Plaintiff United States of America, ex rel. Michael K. Drakeford, M.D., filed a qui tarn complaint *780against Defendant Tuomey d/b/a Tuomey Healthcare System, Inc. The Government filed amended complaints on December 21, 2007 and November 12, 2008. The Government alle

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 04-3092 September Term, 2006 04cr00010-01 Filed On: July 12, 2007 United States of America, Appellee v. Paul Askew, Appellant BEFORE: Gins

265 Pa. Superior Ct. 363 (1979) 401 A.2d 1348 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Richard G. MORRISON, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Florence MORRISON, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted April 10, 1978. Decided April 19, 1979. *365 Wilbert H. Beachy, III, Chief Public

Cureton, Judge: The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the Alton Newton Evangelistic Association, Inc., is a church within the meaning of Section 41-27-260(10) of the South Carolina Employment Security Law and is therefore exempt from contributing to the unemployment insurance fund. The South Carolina Employment Security Commission held that the Association was not a church and the circuit court affirmed the d

SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge: Robert Lee Johnson appeals his conviction for possession, with intent to distribute, of crack cocaine. He argues that the evidence against him was the product of a stop and frisk that was not supported by reasonable suspicion. We affirm. I. According to the evidence in the record, on the night of Joh

675 F.3d 394 (2012) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Michael K. DRAKEFORD, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TUOMEY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant, v. Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge and Rice Law Firm; Wesmark Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC; James Arthur Goodson, III, M.D.; Kim Saccone, Movants. American Hospital Association, Amicus Supporting Appellant. No. 10-1819. United Stat

140 P.3d 44 (2005) Liz ABROMEIT, Angela Ackland, Jody Amsberry, Denise Archer, Rachel Archer, Jack Armijo, Karla Baken, Norman R. Bangeman, Brenda Banks, Gloria Barajas, Adele Barney, Albinita Barreras, Kay Bateman, Mary Blaylock, Lucia Blea (Bachicha), William Bogy, Barbara Bole, Luann Booth, Kim Buchholz, Lena Bujanda, Maria Bullock, Linda Burgdorf, Lenny Bustos, Freddie Carter, Sylvia Castillo, Phillip Cedillo, Brenda Cessar, Michelle Chorens, Lori Co

482 S.E.2d 140 (1996) 198 W.Va. 523 Sandra MICHAEL, as Executrix of the Estate of Donald Kelly Michael, and Sandra Michael, Individually, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. The MARION COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant Below, Appellee. Allen AYERSMAN, Petitioner, v. John PYLES, Florence Merow, and Elizabeth Martin, in their capacities as Commissioners constituting the County Commission of Monongalia County; and J

Per Curiam: Harry J. Norwood, an employee of American Tobacco Company (employer), died under circumstances entitling his dependents to benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act. The employer and the carrier, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, admitted liability and asked the Industrial Commission to determine to whom benefits were due. In August 1985, after a hearing, the Commission determined

SUMMARY ORDER These appeals arise from three consolidated actions. The common claim made by the Schaghticoke Tribal Nation (“STN”) in each case is that it is an Indian tribe that has been dispossessed of Indian land without the approval of Congress in violation of the Indian Nonintercourse Act, 25 U.S.C. § 177. That statute provides, in relevant part, that “[n]o purchase, grant, lease, or other conveyance of lands, or of any title or cl